This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/6236108.stm

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Education 'fails poorer children' Education 'fails poorer children'
(about 3 hours later)
The government's education policy has failed to give poorer children the chance to improve their social standing, a charity has claimed. A cross-party commission should be set up to examine the reasons behind the UK's very low social mobility, an education charity says.
The founder of education policy group, the Sutton Trust, says Britain has "the lowest social mobility of any country you can measure". The Sutton Trust says the government's education policy has failed to give poorer children the chance to improve quality of life.
Sir Peter Lampl says places at the best schools are taken by children from more affluent families. Its founder Sir Peter Lampl says the problem "goes beyond party politics".
Tory leader David Cameron told the BBC it was "a problem of fairness". Tory leader David Cameron backed the call for a commission, saying there was "a problem of fairness" in the UK.
The study found that children born in the 1950s had a better chance of escaping poverty than those born in the 1970s. Sir Peter said: "Both Gordon Brown and David Cameron have acknowledged the seriousness of this issue, but our low level of social mobility is a problem that goes beyond party politics.
The decline in social mobility has now flattened off, the report concludes, but is still much worse than a few generations ago. Escaping poverty
"It is a national issue which requires a national solution. We urgently need an independent cross-party commission to examine why our record is so poor and how we can address this."
The study found that children born in the 1950s had a better chance of escaping poverty than those born in 1970.
What we've moved towards is a socially selective system Sir Peter LamplSutton Trust
The decline in social mobility seen during the 1970s and 1980s has now flattened off, the report concludes, but shows no sign of reversing.
The UK comes bottom of the table of developed countries for which there is data available, it adds.
The report coincides with a series on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Humphreys on Class, looking at issues surrounding the divide between the rich and poor in Britain.
Greater opportunitiesGreater opportunities
The research was carried out on behalf of the Sutton Trust by the London School of Economics (LSE).The research was carried out on behalf of the Sutton Trust by the London School of Economics (LSE).
If people aren't achieving according to their talents, according to their potential, it's a huge waste for them, it's a huge waste for society, but it's also deeply unfair David Cameron
Professor Steve Machin, from LSE, said: "We had a very big expansion of the higher education system in the late 1980s and early 1990s, but contrary to many people's expectations this actually reinforced social immobility."Professor Steve Machin, from LSE, said: "We had a very big expansion of the higher education system in the late 1980s and early 1990s, but contrary to many people's expectations this actually reinforced social immobility."
What we've moved towards is a socially selective system Sir Peter LamplSutton Trust
He said people at the bottom of the "income distribution" were ill-equipped to take advantage of the greater opportunities.He said people at the bottom of the "income distribution" were ill-equipped to take advantage of the greater opportunities.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Mr Cameron said: "To me it's a problem of fairness, because if people aren't achieving according to their talents, according to their potential, it's a huge waste for them, it's a huge waste for society, but it's also deeply unfair."Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Mr Cameron said: "To me it's a problem of fairness, because if people aren't achieving according to their talents, according to their potential, it's a huge waste for them, it's a huge waste for society, but it's also deeply unfair."
He said the "absolute driver of social mobility" was education and recommended the building of more schools, including city academies.He said the "absolute driver of social mobility" was education and recommended the building of more schools, including city academies.
"We have got to get more good school places otherwise all we're doing is trying to find a different way of dividing up the cake," Mr Cameron said."We have got to get more good school places otherwise all we're doing is trying to find a different way of dividing up the cake," Mr Cameron said.
'Socially selective''Socially selective'
Sir Peter Lampl said inequality between the rich and poor in Britain was a root cause of the problem.Sir Peter Lampl said inequality between the rich and poor in Britain was a root cause of the problem.
"There's further to go if you want to be mobile and those at the top end are able to invest more in education so they gain advantages," he told BBC Radio 4. "There's further to go if you want to be mobile and those at the top end are able to invest more in education so they gain advantages," he said.
"What we've moved towards is a socially selective system."What we've moved towards is a socially selective system.
"We have the lowest social mobility of any country which you can measure." "We have the lowest social mobility of any country you can measure."
The Sutton Trust says better provision of early years education is needed to prevent children falling behind by the age of three.The Sutton Trust says better provision of early years education is needed to prevent children falling behind by the age of three.
It also wants to "democratise selection" at independent schools, deciding access by lottery and funding places for poorer children who cannot afford the fees.It also wants to "democratise selection" at independent schools, deciding access by lottery and funding places for poorer children who cannot afford the fees.
The charity also recommends the creation of an independent watchdog to monitor school performance and separate education from party politics.
It says a body with powers similar to the Bank of England's interest-setting Monetary Policy Committee should scrutinise exam results.