This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/apr/03/volunteer-libraries-unlawful-high-court-rules

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
High court stalls council's attempt to introduce volunteer-run libraries High court stalls council's attempt to introduce volunteer-run libraries
(about 17 hours later)
A county council's attempt to remove paid staff from 10 libraries and replace them with volunteers has been ruled unlawful by the high court on Tuesday because of "equality" issues. A county council's attempt to replace paid staff at 10 libraries with volunteers has been ruled unlawful by the high court on Tuesday because of equality issues.
Two residents who challenged Surrey county council were backed by judge Mr Justice Wilkie, who said the local authority "failed to have due regard to the equality issues" raised by the case.Two residents who challenged Surrey county council were backed by judge Mr Justice Wilkie, who said the local authority "failed to have due regard to the equality issues" raised by the case.
The council had planned to remove all paid staff from 10 community libraries, leaving them to be run entirely by volunteers, as part of a move aimed at keeping its 52 libraries open. The council had planned to remove the staff from 10 community libraries as part of a move aimed at keeping its 52 libraries open. But the high court heard that an equality assessment, outlining how volunteers would be trained to deal with customers with equality issues, such as disabled people, had not been put before the council cabinet when it took the decision.
But the high court heard that an equality assessment, outlining how volunteers would be trained to deal with customers with equality issues, such as disabled people,, had not been put before the council cabinet when it took the decision.
Library campaigners hailed the decision as a victory. The council claimed the challenge had been upheld on a technical point and said there was no criticism of its plans for the libraries, "meaning the proposals could still go ahead".Library campaigners hailed the decision as a victory. The council claimed the challenge had been upheld on a technical point and said there was no criticism of its plans for the libraries, "meaning the proposals could still go ahead".
The libraries identified as possible community facilities were Bagshot, Bramley, Byfleet, Ewell Court, Lingfield, New Haw, Stoneleigh, Tattenhams, Virginia Water and Warlingham.The libraries identified as possible community facilities were Bagshot, Bramley, Byfleet, Ewell Court, Lingfield, New Haw, Stoneleigh, Tattenhams, Virginia Water and Warlingham.
Claimant Nicholas Dorrington said he hoped the ruling would remind councillors "that they should not forget that we employ them to provide efficient services". Nicholas Dorrington, one of the residents, said he hoped the ruling would remind councillors "that they should not forget that we employ them to provide efficient services".
•This article was amended at 16.30 on Tuesday 3 April. The original introduction did not fully explain that the ruling related to equality issues raised by the case•This article was amended at 16.30 on Tuesday 3 April. The original introduction did not fully explain that the ruling related to equality issues raised by the case