This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/apr/18/british-copyright-law-internet

The article has changed 18 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
British copyright law and internet realities British copyright law and internet realities
(35 minutes later)
Copying songs, films or images from the internet without permission is illegal under Britain's copyright laws, which would be draconian were it not for the fact that they are so frequently flouted and with so little comeback. The principle, though, is straightforward: unless a copyright owner has given permission for content to be shared – whether via YouTube or the photo-sharing site Flickr – copying, even for private use, is illegal.Copying songs, films or images from the internet without permission is illegal under Britain's copyright laws, which would be draconian were it not for the fact that they are so frequently flouted and with so little comeback. The principle, though, is straightforward: unless a copyright owner has given permission for content to be shared – whether via YouTube or the photo-sharing site Flickr – copying, even for private use, is illegal.
Which is why, more than 10 years after the iPod was launched, it is still in law not permissible to rip songs from a CD on to a computer or digital music player. The only legal exemption is the so-called "time shifting" exemption, which allows people to record television programmes for personal use.Which is why, more than 10 years after the iPod was launched, it is still in law not permissible to rip songs from a CD on to a computer or digital music player. The only legal exemption is the so-called "time shifting" exemption, which allows people to record television programmes for personal use.
So draconian is the existing law that a parody song, such as the viral online hit Newport State of Mind, can be taken down, because, in this case, the writers of the original Empire State of Mind don't approve.So draconian is the existing law that a parody song, such as the viral online hit Newport State of Mind, can be taken down, because, in this case, the writers of the original Empire State of Mind don't approve.
Ministers intend to relax the rules once the Hargreaves review into intellectual property is implemented, which would give Britons the same freedoms from copyright actions as their American and German counterparts, but consultation into how to do so finished only last month.Ministers intend to relax the rules once the Hargreaves review into intellectual property is implemented, which would give Britons the same freedoms from copyright actions as their American and German counterparts, but consultation into how to do so finished only last month.
However, few people worry about the reality of the law: although there is a growing recognition that copying media, and in particular music, can harm creators, the true barriers to piracy are technological. Most people are too confused by "torrent" illegal download sites, and so prefer legal alternatives. At the same time, despite various efforts to force internet providers to send warning letters, or agree to other stiffer measures, the truth is that it is not economic for media companies to pursue small copyright infringers. British copyright law and internet copyright reality remain some distance apart.However, few people worry about the reality of the law: although there is a growing recognition that copying media, and in particular music, can harm creators, the true barriers to piracy are technological. Most people are too confused by "torrent" illegal download sites, and so prefer legal alternatives. At the same time, despite various efforts to force internet providers to send warning letters, or agree to other stiffer measures, the truth is that it is not economic for media companies to pursue small copyright infringers. British copyright law and internet copyright reality remain some distance apart.
More from Battle for the internetMore from Battle for the internet
The Guardian is taking stock of the new battlegrounds for the internet. From states stifling dissent to the new cyberwar front line, we look at the challenges facing the dream of an open internetThe Guardian is taking stock of the new battlegrounds for the internet. From states stifling dissent to the new cyberwar front line, we look at the challenges facing the dream of an open internet
Interactive: 18 Oct 2012: Live video chat: Google+ Hangout with Jemima Kiss on who controls the internet Interactive: 18 Oct 2012: Live video chat: Google+ Hangout with Jemima Kiss on who controls the internet
18 Apr 2012: Richard O'Dwyer: Lib Dems fight to halt extradition to US on piracy charges18 Apr 2012: Richard O'Dwyer: Lib Dems fight to halt extradition to US on piracy charges
18 Apr 2012: Don't let software patents stop us standing on the shoulders of giants | Jonathan Zittrain18 Apr 2012: Don't let software patents stop us standing on the shoulders of giants | Jonathan Zittrain
Battle for the internet indexBattle for the internet index
Ofcom outlines new anti-piracy rulesOfcom outlines new anti-piracy rules
26 Jun 201226 Jun 2012
Draft code details new 'three strikes' policy for illegal downloaders, to come into effect from March 2014. By Mark SweneyDraft code details new 'three strikes' policy for illegal downloaders, to come into effect from March 2014. By Mark Sweney
18 Jan 2012 20 Sep 2011
ACS:Law solicitor at centre of internet piracy row suspended Could the Pirate party's German success be repeated in Britain?
4 Nov 20114 Nov 2011
BT under pressure to block The Pirate BayBT under pressure to block The Pirate Bay
27 Aug 2009
Mandelson memo
4 Apr 20094 Apr 2009
Swedish internet use plummets after filesharing curb introducedSwedish internet use plummets after filesharing curb introduced
Google boss: anti-piracy laws would be disaster for free speech 27 Aug 2009
18 May 2011 Mandelson memo
Eric Schmidt claims search giant would fight attempts to restrict access to sites such as the Pirate Bay. By Josh Halliday ACS:Law solicitor at centre of internet piracy row suspended
18 Jan 2012
Andrew Crossley suspended for two years and ordered to pay £76,000 for demanding money from web users. By Josh Halliday
Turn autoplay offTurn autoplay off
Turn autoplay onTurn autoplay on
Please activate cookies in order to turn autoplay offPlease activate cookies in order to turn autoplay off
Edition: UKEdition: UK
About usAbout us
Today's paperToday's paper
SubscribeSubscribe
Though British law is very clear on the illegality of copying media, the true barriers to wider piracy are technologicalThough British law is very clear on the illegality of copying media, the true barriers to wider piracy are technological
Copying songs, films or images from the internet without permission is illegal under Britain's copyright laws, which would be draconian were it not for the fact that they are so frequently flouted and with so little comeback. The principle, though, is straightforward: unless a copyright owner has given permission for content to be shared – whether via YouTube or the photo-sharing site Flickr – copying, even for private use, is illegal.Copying songs, films or images from the internet without permission is illegal under Britain's copyright laws, which would be draconian were it not for the fact that they are so frequently flouted and with so little comeback. The principle, though, is straightforward: unless a copyright owner has given permission for content to be shared – whether via YouTube or the photo-sharing site Flickr – copying, even for private use, is illegal.
Which is why, more than 10 years after the iPod was launched, it is still in law not permissible to rip songs from a CD on to a computer or digital music player. The only legal exemption is the so-called "time shifting" exemption, which allows people to record television programmes for personal use.Which is why, more than 10 years after the iPod was launched, it is still in law not permissible to rip songs from a CD on to a computer or digital music player. The only legal exemption is the so-called "time shifting" exemption, which allows people to record television programmes for personal use.
So draconian is the existing law that a parody song, such as the viral online hit Newport State of Mind, can be taken down, because, in this case, the writers of the original Empire State of Mind don't approve.So draconian is the existing law that a parody song, such as the viral online hit Newport State of Mind, can be taken down, because, in this case, the writers of the original Empire State of Mind don't approve.
Ministers intend to relax the rules once the Hargreaves review into intellectual property is implemented, which would give Britons the same freedoms from copyright actions as their American and German counterparts, but consultation into how to do so finished only last month.Ministers intend to relax the rules once the Hargreaves review into intellectual property is implemented, which would give Britons the same freedoms from copyright actions as their American and German counterparts, but consultation into how to do so finished only last month.
However, few people worry about the reality of the law: although there is a growing recognition that copying media, and in particular music, can harm creators, the true barriers to piracy are technological. Most people are too confused by "torrent" illegal download sites, and so prefer legal alternatives. At the same time, despite various efforts to force internet providers to send warning letters, or agree to other stiffer measures, the truth is that it is not economic for media companies to pursue small copyright infringers. British copyright law and internet copyright reality remain some distance apart.However, few people worry about the reality of the law: although there is a growing recognition that copying media, and in particular music, can harm creators, the true barriers to piracy are technological. Most people are too confused by "torrent" illegal download sites, and so prefer legal alternatives. At the same time, despite various efforts to force internet providers to send warning letters, or agree to other stiffer measures, the truth is that it is not economic for media companies to pursue small copyright infringers. British copyright law and internet copyright reality remain some distance apart.