This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/apr/27/high-court-ban-protesters-sleeping-parliament
The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 3 | Version 4 |
---|---|
High court upholds ban on protesters sleeping outside parliament | High court upholds ban on protesters sleeping outside parliament |
(12 days later) | |
Rules preventing demonstrators sleeping near the Houses of Parliament have been upheld by the high court in a landmark ruling. | Rules preventing demonstrators sleeping near the Houses of Parliament have been upheld by the high court in a landmark ruling. |
Two judges rejected a test case human rights challenge on Friday brought by veteran peace campaigner Maria Gallastegui, who has been conducting an authorised 24-hour vigil on the East Pavement of Parliament Square in London since 2006. | Two judges rejected a test case human rights challenge on Friday brought by veteran peace campaigner Maria Gallastegui, who has been conducting an authorised 24-hour vigil on the East Pavement of Parliament Square in London since 2006. |
Sir John Thomas, who is president of the Queen's Bench Division, sitting with Mr Justice Silber, said the rules were "plainly" lawful and did not contravene the Human Rights Act. | Sir John Thomas, who is president of the Queen's Bench Division, sitting with Mr Justice Silber, said the rules were "plainly" lawful and did not contravene the Human Rights Act. |
Gallastegui, 53, a former coach driver from Hammersmith, west London, said she was hopeful of overturning the ruling on appeal. | Gallastegui, 53, a former coach driver from Hammersmith, west London, said she was hopeful of overturning the ruling on appeal. |
"I am hopeful that I can still win," she said after the hearing. "The ruling today didn't surprise me really." | "I am hopeful that I can still win," she said after the hearing. "The ruling today didn't surprise me really." |
She added: "I'm not just fighting this case for me now. There's a lull in protest at the moment. This is for the future - for if another issue comes along and there is a critical mass of people who want to protest against, for example, another war." | She added: "I'm not just fighting this case for me now. There's a lull in protest at the moment. This is for the future - for if another issue comes along and there is a critical mass of people who want to protest against, for example, another war." |
Gallastegui said she had been involved with the Parliament Square protest for 10 years and had lived on the site for six years. | Gallastegui said she had been involved with the Parliament Square protest for 10 years and had lived on the site for six years. |
Judges said Gallastegui could not be moved until after a further high court hearing next Thursday. | Judges said Gallastegui could not be moved until after a further high court hearing next Thursday. |
At that hearing, lawyers for Gallastegui said they would probably seek permission to appeal. | At that hearing, lawyers for Gallastegui said they would probably seek permission to appeal. |
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. |
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe. |
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. |