This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/blog/2012/may/10/leveson-inquiry-andy-coulson-viscount-rothermere-live

The article has changed 13 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Leveson inquiry: Andy Coulson, Viscount Rothermere - live Leveson inquiry: Andy Coulson, Viscount Rothermere - live
(40 minutes later)
1.14pm: Here is a short summary of the second half of this morning's evidence:
• Independent on Sunday editor maintained it ran legitimate story on Andy Coulson, after being summoned by Leveson inquiry.
• Lord Justice Leveson said it was not his duty to decide the political future of the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, over his dealings with News Corp.
• Emails from Hunt's adviser raised serious questions over a perception of a "too cosy" relationship between Murdoch and government, counsel to the inquiry Robert Jay said.
• Rupert Murdoch may have shown "selective amnesia" about relations with Margaret Thatcher and Times takeover, Jay said.
1.02pm: The inquiry has now broken for lunch. It will resume at 2pm, when Andy Coulson will give evidence.1.02pm: The inquiry has now broken for lunch. It will resume at 2pm, when Andy Coulson will give evidence.
1.00pm: Barr comments that Mullin's statement contains what could be read as an apology.1.00pm: Barr comments that Mullin's statement contains what could be read as an apology.
Mullin says he made the decision to publish the story and, with hindsight, there was scope to seek informal guidance of the inquiry.Mullin says he made the decision to publish the story and, with hindsight, there was scope to seek informal guidance of the inquiry.
However, he suggests this would not have dissuaded him to publish the story. He apologises for the trouble it may have caused the inquiry.However, he suggests this would not have dissuaded him to publish the story. He apologises for the trouble it may have caused the inquiry.
"With hindsight there might have been scope to seek some sort of guidance from inquiry. I do apologise for the trouble this has cost the inquiry and apologise for effort you have had to go to today, it wasn't our intention, we are motivated only by trying to get to the bottom of this issue, as is the inquiry," he says."With hindsight there might have been scope to seek some sort of guidance from inquiry. I do apologise for the trouble this has cost the inquiry and apologise for effort you have had to go to today, it wasn't our intention, we are motivated only by trying to get to the bottom of this issue, as is the inquiry," he says.
Leveson says, rather grumpily: "Alright."Leveson says, rather grumpily: "Alright."
Mullin: "We are motivated only to get to the bottom of this issue, as is the inquiry."Mullin: "We are motivated only to get to the bottom of this issue, as is the inquiry."
Leveson says he will think about what Mullin has said very carefully.Leveson says he will think about what Mullin has said very carefully.
12.54pm: Barr says there was "no public interest" in revealing something that was going to be revealed in a witness statement four days later.12.54pm: Barr says there was "no public interest" in revealing something that was going to be revealed in a witness statement four days later.
Mullin says the key issue regarding Andy Coulson is who knew what and when.Mullin says the key issue regarding Andy Coulson is who knew what and when.
"My job as editor is to put in the public domain the key question that has to be answered. I think putting that in the public mind before Andy Coulson gives evidence is perfectly defensible journalism," he adds."My job as editor is to put in the public domain the key question that has to be answered. I think putting that in the public mind before Andy Coulson gives evidence is perfectly defensible journalism," he adds.
Barr contends that it was not in public interest to publish four days before due to come out in public inquiry.Barr contends that it was not in public interest to publish four days before due to come out in public inquiry.
"I didn't know how you were going to deal with the shareholding issue," says Mullin."I didn't know how you were going to deal with the shareholding issue," says Mullin.
12.51pm: Alan Rusbridger, editor of the Guardian, has just tweeted:12.51pm: Alan Rusbridger, editor of the Guardian, has just tweeted:
Mullin: "We may not be the world's greatest newspaper. We may not even be t greatest paper in our own building"#LevesonMullin: "We may not be the world's greatest newspaper. We may not even be t greatest paper in our own building"#Leveson
— alan rusbridger (@arusbridger) May 10, 2012— alan rusbridger (@arusbridger) May 10, 2012
Ian Katz, deputy editor of the Guardian, tweets:Ian Katz, deputy editor of the Guardian, tweets:
Terrifically robust performance by John Mullin at #Leveson defending his running of Coulson shareholding storyTerrifically robust performance by John Mullin at #Leveson defending his running of Coulson shareholding story
— ian katz (@iankatz1000) May 10, 2012— ian katz (@iankatz1000) May 10, 2012
12.51pm: Mullin repeats: "We have used nothing from Coulson's statement."12.51pm: Mullin repeats: "We have used nothing from Coulson's statement."
12.48pm: Lord Justice Leveson says he is anxious to ensure that evidence is prepared in an orderly fashion, not to censor or keep it secret.12.48pm: Lord Justice Leveson says he is anxious to ensure that evidence is prepared in an orderly fashion, not to censor or keep it secret.
"The risk is by doing what you've done is you've created a dialogue … with people having to respond, before we've even heard it," Leveson says."The risk is by doing what you've done is you've created a dialogue … with people having to respond, before we've even heard it," Leveson says.
Mullin maintains that this was an issue of "massive public importance" and that the inquiry should not stand in the way of "good, honest journalism".Mullin maintains that this was an issue of "massive public importance" and that the inquiry should not stand in the way of "good, honest journalism".
Leveson says it wasn't because someone broke the confidentiality agreement about witness statements.Leveson says it wasn't because someone broke the confidentiality agreement about witness statements.
12.47pm: Mullin says he did not believe the inquiry's order restricting publication of confidential material applied to this story because they had three independent sources who had confirmed Coulson's shareholding.12.47pm: Mullin says he did not believe the inquiry's order restricting publication of confidential material applied to this story because they had three independent sources who had confirmed Coulson's shareholding.
"Nothing that appeared in our story didn't come from the three sources that I've outlined," he says."Nothing that appeared in our story didn't come from the three sources that I've outlined," he says.
12.43pm: Mullin says the Independent on Sunday received Coulson's witness statement last Thursday, but had confirmed the shareholding prior to this.12.43pm: Mullin says the Independent on Sunday received Coulson's witness statement last Thursday, but had confirmed the shareholding prior to this.
Pressed by Barr, Mullin says he is not prepared to comment further than to say the statement did not come from a core participant or a member of the inquiry team.Pressed by Barr, Mullin says he is not prepared to comment further than to say the statement did not come from a core participant or a member of the inquiry team.
Mullin confirms he was shown Coulson's witness statement, which he read, but has not retained it or a copy of it. Barr asks why he read it.Mullin confirms he was shown Coulson's witness statement, which he read, but has not retained it or a copy of it. Barr asks why he read it.
Mullin replies:Mullin replies:
Human nature. In retrospect it would have been much better all round had I not read it.Human nature. In retrospect it would have been much better all round had I not read it.
Mullin confirms that the Independent on Sunday already had three sources on Coulson's News Corp shareholding.Mullin confirms that the Independent on Sunday already had three sources on Coulson's News Corp shareholding.
Barr asks if the statement gave him a fourth source.Barr asks if the statement gave him a fourth source.
Mullin replies:Mullin replies:
I wouldn't put it like that. Had we been a daily newspaper we would have been perfectly able to publish the story we published in the Independent on Sunday on Thursday before even receiving the statement.I wouldn't put it like that. Had we been a daily newspaper we would have been perfectly able to publish the story we published in the Independent on Sunday on Thursday before even receiving the statement.
He repeats that the statement was not used a source.He repeats that the statement was not used a source.
12.35pm: John Mullin, editor of the Independent on Sunday, has taken the stand.12.35pm: John Mullin, editor of the Independent on Sunday, has taken the stand.
David Barr, counsel to the inquiry, is questioning Mullin, who confirms he was personally involved in the decision to publish this story.David Barr, counsel to the inquiry, is questioning Mullin, who confirms he was personally involved in the decision to publish this story.
12.35pm: Meanwhile, Alastair Campbell is embroiled in a Twitter spat with the Telegraph columnist Toby Young.12.35pm: Meanwhile, Alastair Campbell is embroiled in a Twitter spat with the Telegraph columnist Toby Young.
Campbell says:Campbell says:
@toadmeister would you care to withdraw your libellous tweet claiming I leaked my Leveson statement, and apologise?@toadmeister would you care to withdraw your libellous tweet claiming I leaked my Leveson statement, and apologise?
— Alastair Campbell (@campbellclaret) May 10, 2012— Alastair Campbell (@campbellclaret) May 10, 2012
Young has not yet responded.Young has not yet responded.
12.33pm: Lord Justice Leveson turns to the Independent on Sunday article about Andy Coulson. The article, apparently based on leaked evidence from Coulson's witness statement, reported that the former News of the World editor had shares in News Corp while he was David Cameron's director of communications.12.33pm: Lord Justice Leveson turns to the Independent on Sunday article about Andy Coulson. The article, apparently based on leaked evidence from Coulson's witness statement, reported that the former News of the World editor had shares in News Corp while he was David Cameron's director of communications.
12.31pm: Jay concludes his opening remarks by comparing "the apparent similarity of thinking" between Rupert Murdoch's evidence and memoirs by Tony Blair.12.31pm: Jay concludes his opening remarks by comparing "the apparent similarity of thinking" between Rupert Murdoch's evidence and memoirs by Tony Blair.
12.26pm: The Guardian's deputy editor, Ian Katz, has just tweeted:12.26pm: The Guardian's deputy editor, Ian Katz, has just tweeted:
Goodness...did Robert Jay just say inquiry was looking into "propinquity" of politicians and media folk? Almost trumps his "pellucid" momentGoodness...did Robert Jay just say inquiry was looking into "propinquity" of politicians and media folk? Almost trumps his "pellucid" moment
— ian katz (@iankatz1000) May 10, 2012— ian katz (@iankatz1000) May 10, 2012
andand
Breaking propinquity update en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propinqui… #LevesonBreaking propinquity update en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propinqui… #Leveson
— ian katz (@iankatz1000) May 10, 2012— ian katz (@iankatz1000) May 10, 2012
12.25pm: Jay says the emails by News Corp's Frederic Michel to Jeremy Hunt's special adviser show us "light refracted through two intermediate prisms".12.25pm: Jay says the emails by News Corp's Frederic Michel to Jeremy Hunt's special adviser show us "light refracted through two intermediate prisms".
"I express no view one way or another ... However it is right I should echo the note of caution you sounded on 26 April. If the emails were direct communication between the culture secretary and James Murdoch the case would be relatively clearcut."I express no view one way or another ... However it is right I should echo the note of caution you sounded on 26 April. If the emails were direct communication between the culture secretary and James Murdoch the case would be relatively clearcut.
"They are not. What we see is light refracted through two intermediate prisms. Inevitably what we are seeing is not white light but many colours of the rainbow.""They are not. What we see is light refracted through two intermediate prisms. Inevitably what we are seeing is not white light but many colours of the rainbow."
Jay adds: "If you were to conclude otherwise there is a range of possible findings. The least serious finding is an appearance of bias in relation to the special adviser's dealings [with News Corp].Jay adds: "If you were to conclude otherwise there is a range of possible findings. The least serious finding is an appearance of bias in relation to the special adviser's dealings [with News Corp].
"The most serious is that the nature of the relationship was such that the secretary of state was prepared expressly to authorise a special adviser to have convert relations with a lobbyist ... to put another way, provide a running commentary on the bid giving assurances it would ultimately be successful.""The most serious is that the nature of the relationship was such that the secretary of state was prepared expressly to authorise a special adviser to have convert relations with a lobbyist ... to put another way, provide a running commentary on the bid giving assurances it would ultimately be successful."
He adds: "Politicians are entitled to be friendly with whomsoever they might choose. The issue is where the lines should be drawn."He adds: "Politicians are entitled to be friendly with whomsoever they might choose. The issue is where the lines should be drawn."
12.22pm: Jay raises the News Corp bid for BSkyB.12.22pm: Jay raises the News Corp bid for BSkyB.
He says the terms of reference for the inquiry do not permit Lord Justice Leveson to decide the immediate political fate of the culture secretary Jeremy Hunt.He says the terms of reference for the inquiry do not permit Lord Justice Leveson to decide the immediate political fate of the culture secretary Jeremy Hunt.
However, he says the inquiry is concerned to uncover to what extent the minister may have failed to fulfil a quasi-judicial function because he was too close to News Corp.However, he says the inquiry is concerned to uncover to what extent the minister may have failed to fulfil a quasi-judicial function because he was too close to News Corp.
Jay says the question is whether Hunt's dealings could be perceived as "a microcosm of a too cosy relationship" between politicians and the press.Jay says the question is whether Hunt's dealings could be perceived as "a microcosm of a too cosy relationship" between politicians and the press.
12.19pm: Jay says an important theme of this module will be to examine a failure to act on previous warnings about media misconduct, citing the royal commissions, two Calcutt reports, the response to the death of Princess Diana and Operation Motorman.12.19pm: Jay says an important theme of this module will be to examine a failure to act on previous warnings about media misconduct, citing the royal commissions, two Calcutt reports, the response to the death of Princess Diana and Operation Motorman.
He adds: "Questions clearly do arise – genuine disinclination to clip the wings of the press and hold the right people to account?"He adds: "Questions clearly do arise – genuine disinclination to clip the wings of the press and hold the right people to account?"
12.16pm: News International has the greatest potential influence over politics, says Jay, while Associated Newspapers also has sway with its connection with middle England.12.16pm: News International has the greatest potential influence over politics, says Jay, while Associated Newspapers also has sway with its connection with middle England.
He adds that there is "likely to be a correlation" between market share of the newspaper market and influence over politics.He adds that there is "likely to be a correlation" between market share of the newspaper market and influence over politics.
12.13pm: Alan Rusbridger, editor of the Guardian, has just tweeted:12.13pm: Alan Rusbridger, editor of the Guardian, has just tweeted:
Jay suggests Rupert Murdoch has "selective amnesia" about his lunch w Thatcher in 1981. Cd bear on his integrity #LevesonJay suggests Rupert Murdoch has "selective amnesia" about his lunch w Thatcher in 1981. Cd bear on his integrity #Leveson
— alan rusbridger (@arusbridger) May 10, 2012— alan rusbridger (@arusbridger) May 10, 2012
12.12pm: Jay suggests that Rupert Murdoch suffered "selective amnesia" around his meeting with then-prime minister Margaret Thatcher in 1981 before his purchase of the Times.12.12pm: Jay suggests that Rupert Murdoch suffered "selective amnesia" around his meeting with then-prime minister Margaret Thatcher in 1981 before his purchase of the Times.
"If you accept Mr Murdoch's evidence on this topic the point goes no further. If you do not the consequences ... go wide-ranging," Jay says, adding that inferences might be drawn about Murdoch's true intentions and are "capable of bearing on Mr Murdoch's integrity"."If you accept Mr Murdoch's evidence on this topic the point goes no further. If you do not the consequences ... go wide-ranging," Jay says, adding that inferences might be drawn about Murdoch's true intentions and are "capable of bearing on Mr Murdoch's integrity".
12.07pm: Jay says the heart of the matter is that the press are perceived to have influence over the public which can be traded by the government of the day in return for sway over media policy.12.07pm: Jay says the heart of the matter is that the press are perceived to have influence over the public which can be traded by the government of the day in return for sway over media policy.
He he uses the word "perception" because it perhaps can never be proved a newspaper has won an election for a particular party, such as in 1992. Can be argued either way, he says. It can be argued the Sun reflected public opinion that would have delivered the same result either way.He he uses the word "perception" because it perhaps can never be proved a newspaper has won an election for a particular party, such as in 1992. Can be argued either way, he says. It can be argued the Sun reflected public opinion that would have delivered the same result either way.
But Jay says politicians "must still believe that newspapers can make a difference – why else would they go to such lengths to cultivate access" to people like Rupert Murdoch?But Jay says politicians "must still believe that newspapers can make a difference – why else would they go to such lengths to cultivate access" to people like Rupert Murdoch?
12.01pm: Jay says that "off the record" conversations and informal contact between politicians and the press can be a part of a healthy democracy.12.01pm: Jay says that "off the record" conversations and informal contact between politicians and the press can be a part of a healthy democracy.
The relationship becomes less healthy, he says, when the public is misled or "if journalists seek to make the news rather than report it" and if politicians pay more attention to coverage of their policies in the media rather than the detail of their policies.The relationship becomes less healthy, he says, when the public is misled or "if journalists seek to make the news rather than report it" and if politicians pay more attention to coverage of their policies in the media rather than the detail of their policies.
He reads an anonymous comment from one core participant who described the relationship between some politicians and the press as "incestuous and self-serving".He reads an anonymous comment from one core participant who described the relationship between some politicians and the press as "incestuous and self-serving".
12.00pm: Robert Jay, counsel to the inquiry, now makes his opening remarks on module three of the inquiry.12.00pm: Robert Jay, counsel to the inquiry, now makes his opening remarks on module three of the inquiry.
He points out that the inquiry will examine whether both politicians and press have acted ethically in this relationship. However, he adds that the conduct of politicians will "not occupy centre stage".He points out that the inquiry will examine whether both politicians and press have acted ethically in this relationship. However, he adds that the conduct of politicians will "not occupy centre stage".
Jay outlines the issues which "occupy the heartland" of module three, as well as some hinterland issues.Jay outlines the issues which "occupy the heartland" of module three, as well as some hinterland issues.
11.53am: Leveson says this module of the inquiry will not draw him into questions of the fitness or suitability of Rupert Murdoch or anyone else, senior policemen or politicians.11.53am: Leveson says this module of the inquiry will not draw him into questions of the fitness or suitability of Rupert Murdoch or anyone else, senior policemen or politicians.
Referring to News Corp's bid for BSkyB, Leveson says: "This inquiry cannot take the place of an inquiry by Ofcom or the Competition Commission."Referring to News Corp's bid for BSkyB, Leveson says: "This inquiry cannot take the place of an inquiry by Ofcom or the Competition Commission."
He warns that he is not attempting to trip up or trap star witnesses and there will be no cross-examinations.He warns that he is not attempting to trip up or trap star witnesses and there will be no cross-examinations.
"Those who look for forensic fireworks should turn to fictional trials," he says."Those who look for forensic fireworks should turn to fictional trials," he says.
11.49am: Leveson says he may have to look at the ministerial code but will not judge on whether it has been breached. "That is simply not my job," he asserts, referring tacitly to the recent controversy around Jeremy Hunt's conduct over the News Corp bid for BSkyB.11.49am: Leveson says he may have to look at the ministerial code but will not judge on whether it has been breached. "That is simply not my job," he asserts, referring tacitly to the recent controversy around Jeremy Hunt's conduct over the News Corp bid for BSkyB.
11.47am: Leveson says module three will ask whether the relationship between politicians and press has "got out of hand".11.47am: Leveson says module three will ask whether the relationship between politicians and press has "got out of hand".
"Does it need to be recalibrated?" he asks."Does it need to be recalibrated?" he asks.
Leveson adds that he intends to make recommendations that will ensure the vital flow of communication for a democracy.Leveson adds that he intends to make recommendations that will ensure the vital flow of communication for a democracy.
He will refer to the Calcutt report and historical inquiries into the conduct of press and poltics.He will refer to the Calcutt report and historical inquiries into the conduct of press and poltics.
Leveson says he wants to succeed where others have failed.Leveson says he wants to succeed where others have failed.
It should not simply represent the next footnote in failed efforts to find a correct approach to the regulation of the press.It should not simply represent the next footnote in failed efforts to find a correct approach to the regulation of the press.
He adds that he will "vigorously resist" any attempt to drag this module of the inquiry into a party political dispute.He adds that he will "vigorously resist" any attempt to drag this module of the inquiry into a party political dispute.
11.41am: The inquiry has resumed.11.41am: The inquiry has resumed.
Lord Justice Leveson marks the opening of module three as the inquiry turns its attention to the relations between politicians and the press.Lord Justice Leveson marks the opening of module three as the inquiry turns its attention to the relations between politicians and the press.
11.34am: Here is a short summary of this morning's evidence:11.34am: Here is a short summary of this morning's evidence:
• Independent on Sunday editor summoned by Lord Justice Leveson over Andy Coulson 'leak'• Independent on Sunday editor summoned by Lord Justice Leveson over Andy Coulson 'leak'
• Viscount Rothermere said Daily Mail coverage of Madeleine McCann was "regrettable"• Viscount Rothermere said Daily Mail coverage of Madeleine McCann was "regrettable"
• Paul Dacre felt Mail on Sunday editor should step aside partly for personal reasons, Rothermere told inquiry• Paul Dacre felt Mail on Sunday editor should step aside partly for personal reasons, Rothermere told inquiry
• Rothermere texted David Cameron after 2010 public debates congratulating him on performance• Rothermere texted David Cameron after 2010 public debates congratulating him on performance
• Had lunch at Chequers with Cameron, former Carlton Communications chief Michael Green and culture secretary Jeremy Hunt among others in July 2010
• Had lunch at Chequers with Cameron, former Carlton Communications chief Michael Green and culture secretary Jeremy Hunt among others in July 2010
11.30am: Rothermere has completed his evidence and the inquiry is taking a short break.11.30am: Rothermere has completed his evidence and the inquiry is taking a short break.
11.29am: Rothermere concludes: "If there is a matter of industry I have a particular view, like the EU privacy directive, the best form of that conversation is in there office with public servants with the whole thing being on the record. I like doing business and pleasure and don't like mixing the two.11.29am: Rothermere concludes: "If there is a matter of industry I have a particular view, like the EU privacy directive, the best form of that conversation is in there office with public servants with the whole thing being on the record. I like doing business and pleasure and don't like mixing the two.
"If I invite someone to my home or their home on a friendly basis and use my access to bore them with my particular problems that's not very good manners.""If I invite someone to my home or their home on a friendly basis and use my access to bore them with my particular problems that's not very good manners."
He adds that it is appropriate to talk general politics in an informal environment but specific issues "are best done in an office environment where everything is on the record" as it stops any accusations of undue access.He adds that it is appropriate to talk general politics in an informal environment but specific issues "are best done in an office environment where everything is on the record" as it stops any accusations of undue access.
11.28am: Leveson says it is legitimate for the coal industry to lobby for coal and greens to lobby against. "The way our democracy works we elect politicians to make decisions and allow commentators to criticise the decisions whichever way it goes," he says.11.28am: Leveson says it is legitimate for the coal industry to lobby for coal and greens to lobby against. "The way our democracy works we elect politicians to make decisions and allow commentators to criticise the decisions whichever way it goes," he says.
The question then becomes, at the level of the press, where there is not a deal – I'm not for a moment suggesting there is a deal - where there can be a recognition that these things are of interest to the press and what we believe to be important, no one's saying 'if you do this we'll support you, we'll go down your route,' but creating the common understanding has with it danger unless it's open or transparent.The question then becomes, at the level of the press, where there is not a deal – I'm not for a moment suggesting there is a deal - where there can be a recognition that these things are of interest to the press and what we believe to be important, no one's saying 'if you do this we'll support you, we'll go down your route,' but creating the common understanding has with it danger unless it's open or transparent.
11.25am: Leveson asks about Rothermere's links with politicians.11.25am: Leveson asks about Rothermere's links with politicians.
Is he able to privately meet politicians while remaining transparent about "what is an opportunity for lobbying", asks Leveson.Is he able to privately meet politicians while remaining transparent about "what is an opportunity for lobbying", asks Leveson.
Rothermere says he takes that responsibility very seriously and believes it is important for him to be "an outsider".Rothermere says he takes that responsibility very seriously and believes it is important for him to be "an outsider".
He adds:He adds:
In order to be an effective newspaper publisher you have to be an outsider. Ultimately when things are exposed you have to have degree of aloofness and professionalism. Means it's sometimes hard to make friends and keep them. That is the cost of doing the job properly.In order to be an effective newspaper publisher you have to be an outsider. Ultimately when things are exposed you have to have degree of aloofness and professionalism. Means it's sometimes hard to make friends and keep them. That is the cost of doing the job properly.
11.21am: Leveson asks whether newspapers really do hold each other to account. "It doesn't happen very often, does it?" he adds.11.21am: Leveson asks whether newspapers really do hold each other to account. "It doesn't happen very often, does it?" he adds.
Leveson says:Leveson says:
The whole business of interception of voicemails, 2005 and 2006 and concern about sentences on those who were breaking the law really dies a death until it so happens the Guardian and the particular journalist in the Guardian [Nick Davies] runs with it and runs with it pretty vigorously. And then nothing happens and then the New York Times picks it up. Who guards the guardians? Have the press failed in that regard, to keep an eye on everyone else?The whole business of interception of voicemails, 2005 and 2006 and concern about sentences on those who were breaking the law really dies a death until it so happens the Guardian and the particular journalist in the Guardian [Nick Davies] runs with it and runs with it pretty vigorously. And then nothing happens and then the New York Times picks it up. Who guards the guardians? Have the press failed in that regard, to keep an eye on everyone else?
Rothermere replies: "The Guardian certainly surfaced much of what has now become public knowledge so I would say that was an example of the press regulating itself."Rothermere replies: "The Guardian certainly surfaced much of what has now become public knowledge so I would say that was an example of the press regulating itself."
Leveson responds: "Do you think? It took the best part of five years, three years before the 2009 article, then something in 2010, then in 2011. They really did have to – this is not an advertisement for the Guardian – I am raising the issue."Leveson responds: "Do you think? It took the best part of five years, three years before the 2009 article, then something in 2010, then in 2011. They really did have to – this is not an advertisement for the Guardian – I am raising the issue."
Rothermere says the Guardian has his admiration for Davies's work on phone hacking.Rothermere says the Guardian has his admiration for Davies's work on phone hacking.
11.19am: Leveson says if proprietors are not benign they "materially affect the way we learn what happens in our democracy".11.19am: Leveson says if proprietors are not benign they "materially affect the way we learn what happens in our democracy".
Rothermere says: "Plurality is the best guard. If you get a Hearstian situation you don't get a natural balance – the universe gets out of kilter."Rothermere says: "Plurality is the best guard. If you get a Hearstian situation you don't get a natural balance – the universe gets out of kilter."
11.18am: The Guardian's Michael White has just tweeted:11.18am: The Guardian's Michael White has just tweeted:
#Leveson Lord R blames Portuguese police for Fleet St's libels on the McCanns. Hisjournos never knowingly print lies, he asserts. Hmmm#Leveson Lord R blames Portuguese police for Fleet St's libels on the McCanns. Hisjournos never knowingly print lies, he asserts. Hmmm
— MichaelWhite (@MichaelWhite) May 10, 2012— MichaelWhite (@MichaelWhite) May 10, 2012
11.11am: Lord Justice Leveson intervenes. He asks whether self-regulation is also about the industry ensuring that its practices are not just "the absolute minimum".11.11am: Lord Justice Leveson intervenes. He asks whether self-regulation is also about the industry ensuring that its practices are not just "the absolute minimum".
Rothermere replies: "I would like to think so. It is very difficult to enforce the law on people where you have no authority to do so."Rothermere replies: "I would like to think so. It is very difficult to enforce the law on people where you have no authority to do so."
Leveson asks about media plurality and newspaper ownership in the UK, which he says consists of "six families, a couple of companies and one or more trusts".Leveson asks about media plurality and newspaper ownership in the UK, which he says consists of "six families, a couple of companies and one or more trusts".
Rothermere says he can see why people would be concerned about this arrangement.Rothermere says he can see why people would be concerned about this arrangement.
"It's hard to imagine, though, a free press that isn't run by commercial interests," he adds. "We try to be as fair as we possibly can, we believe in ethics, that good journalism is ethical journalism, in putting our faith in journalists – most journalists on the whole are good people and want to find the truth.""It's hard to imagine, though, a free press that isn't run by commercial interests," he adds. "We try to be as fair as we possibly can, we believe in ethics, that good journalism is ethical journalism, in putting our faith in journalists – most journalists on the whole are good people and want to find the truth."
11.09am: Rothermere is asked for his thoughts on press regulation.11.09am: Rothermere is asked for his thoughts on press regulation.
He is careful to say only that there is "a perception that self-regulation has not worked".He is careful to say only that there is "a perception that self-regulation has not worked".
Pressed by Jay, he says: "The form of the PCC has not been able to establish a level of trust and faith that is necessary for it to function properly. That is almost certainly the case."Pressed by Jay, he says: "The form of the PCC has not been able to establish a level of trust and faith that is necessary for it to function properly. That is almost certainly the case."
Rothermere believes the PCC has worked as a complaints body, and adds that it is not the job of the commission to administer the law.Rothermere believes the PCC has worked as a complaints body, and adds that it is not the job of the commission to administer the law.
11.08am: Rothermere is asked about the Daily Mail's coverage of Madeleine McCann in 2008.11.08am: Rothermere is asked about the Daily Mail's coverage of Madeleine McCann in 2008.
He says "as a parent you would have to be inhuman not to feel deeply" about Madeleine going missing.He says "as a parent you would have to be inhuman not to feel deeply" about Madeleine going missing.
He adds:He adds:
Firstly, it was obviously a very big story because of the nature of it. The McCanns encouraged publicity for very good reasons. And then there was, I believe, the problems of the jurisdiction [in] Portugal creating briefings. I think our journalists were unfamiliar with the way the Portuguese police operate … a number of allegations were made which we regret … and immediately rectified it and made a donation. It's a regrettable occurrence but it is the nature sometimes of journalism to do that.Firstly, it was obviously a very big story because of the nature of it. The McCanns encouraged publicity for very good reasons. And then there was, I believe, the problems of the jurisdiction [in] Portugal creating briefings. I think our journalists were unfamiliar with the way the Portuguese police operate … a number of allegations were made which we regret … and immediately rectified it and made a donation. It's a regrettable occurrence but it is the nature sometimes of journalism to do that.
11.01am: Murdoch MacLennan, former managing director of Daily Mail publisher Associated Newspapers, intervened in the dispute and went to a lunch at the Howard Hotel with Desmond "to try pour oil on troubled waters, so to speak".11.01am: Murdoch MacLennan, former managing director of Daily Mail publisher Associated Newspapers, intervened in the dispute and went to a lunch at the Howard Hotel with Desmond "to try pour oil on troubled waters, so to speak".
MacLennan went to the lunch, which Rothermere says was on Desmond's invitation.MacLennan went to the lunch, which Rothermere says was on Desmond's invitation.
Following the lunch, Desmond announced publicly that there had been a truce and that the titles would stop the personal attacks. MacLennan did not believe there had been a truce and that Desmond "was just making trouble".Following the lunch, Desmond announced publicly that there had been a truce and that the titles would stop the personal attacks. MacLennan did not believe there had been a truce and that Desmond "was just making trouble".
Rothermere adds that the supposed truce did not last long, because the Express apparently ran further articles criticising the Daily Mail owner.Rothermere adds that the supposed truce did not last long, because the Express apparently ran further articles criticising the Daily Mail owner.
Jay says: "This in microcosm raises the privacy and harassment concerns we touched on earlier. There isn't really a public interest in talking about you?"Jay says: "This in microcosm raises the privacy and harassment concerns we touched on earlier. There isn't really a public interest in talking about you?"
Rothermere replies: "If he had found something genuinely shocking he had every right to publish."Rothermere replies: "If he had found something genuinely shocking he had every right to publish."
Jay says there was no public interest in what he did publish.Jay says there was no public interest in what he did publish.
"I don't think so, no," says Rothermere."I don't think so, no," says Rothermere.
Leveson points out the risk that newspapers use the power of their position to have a go at someone and invade their privacy with no public interest justification.Leveson points out the risk that newspapers use the power of their position to have a go at someone and invade their privacy with no public interest justification.
Rothermere says: "There is obviously a danger of it, yes. It is not a conduct that we condone in our company. Paul Dacre's decision to attack Richard Desmond's ownership of the Express … he thought the government had acted wrongly and it was not in the public interest."Rothermere says: "There is obviously a danger of it, yes. It is not a conduct that we condone in our company. Paul Dacre's decision to attack Richard Desmond's ownership of the Express … he thought the government had acted wrongly and it was not in the public interest."
"If we have a free press there will always be a danger that someone will try to abuse that power. I do not try and do that. I am very mindful and respectful of the power our newspaper has.""If we have a free press there will always be a danger that someone will try to abuse that power. I do not try and do that. I am very mindful and respectful of the power our newspaper has."
10.56am: Jay is asked about The New Machiavelli by Jonathan Powell, a former aide to Tony Blair.10.56am: Jay is asked about The New Machiavelli by Jonathan Powell, a former aide to Tony Blair.
In the book, Powell referred to an ongoing spat between the Daily Mail and the Daily Express in which both titles wrote unflattering articles about the other paper's owner.In the book, Powell referred to an ongoing spat between the Daily Mail and the Daily Express in which both titles wrote unflattering articles about the other paper's owner.
Rothermere admits the Daily Mail called Richard Desmond, owner of the Daily Express, a "pornographer", then says the Express began writing about his illegitimate son of whom Rothermere is "very proud".Rothermere admits the Daily Mail called Richard Desmond, owner of the Daily Express, a "pornographer", then says the Express began writing about his illegitimate son of whom Rothermere is "very proud".
He says: "He seemed to think the fact I have an illegitimate son is of some concern. I am very proud of my son. I don't make a secret of it – the idea i am offended by it is slightly offensive."He says: "He seemed to think the fact I have an illegitimate son is of some concern. I am very proud of my son. I don't make a secret of it – the idea i am offended by it is slightly offensive."
10.49am: Rothermere had a formal meeting with Hunt and Ed Vaizey on 25 August 2010. He says he did not discuss the BSkyB bid on this occasion.10.49am: Rothermere had a formal meeting with Hunt and Ed Vaizey on 25 August 2010. He says he did not discuss the BSkyB bid on this occasion.
He adds that he "cannot recall" having discussed the controversial bid – which his newspaper group publicly opposed – with any politician.He adds that he "cannot recall" having discussed the controversial bid – which his newspaper group publicly opposed – with any politician.
Jay asks if he thinks he might have done.Jay asks if he thinks he might have done.
No, because it was obviously a very contentious issue. It's unlikely that I would have got an answer I wanted anyway. The only answer we would have been wanting was a fair review of the process. I didn't really see any politicians at the time other than these two meetings. I had a very full agenda during the meeting with Ed Vaizey and Jeremy Hunt. At that time it was Vince Cable who had the decision, I didn't see him and don't think I have ever spoken to him in my entire life.No, because it was obviously a very contentious issue. It's unlikely that I would have got an answer I wanted anyway. The only answer we would have been wanting was a fair review of the process. I didn't really see any politicians at the time other than these two meetings. I had a very full agenda during the meeting with Ed Vaizey and Jeremy Hunt. At that time it was Vince Cable who had the decision, I didn't see him and don't think I have ever spoken to him in my entire life.
"It's also not my job to go around lobbying politicians on things like this," he adds."It's also not my job to go around lobbying politicians on things like this," he adds.
10.45am: Rothermere is asked about various private meetings and social occasions attended by politicians and media magnates.10.45am: Rothermere is asked about various private meetings and social occasions attended by politicians and media magnates.
He met with David Cameron, Michael Gove, Michael Green, former head of Carlton Communications (and the PM's ex-boss), Jeremy Hunt and others for lunch at Chequers in July 2010, the inquiry hears.He met with David Cameron, Michael Gove, Michael Green, former head of Carlton Communications (and the PM's ex-boss), Jeremy Hunt and others for lunch at Chequers in July 2010, the inquiry hears.
Rothermere says the only media-related conversation was Hunt's attempt to get the Daily Mail group involved in his local TV plans.Rothermere says the only media-related conversation was Hunt's attempt to get the Daily Mail group involved in his local TV plans.
Jay asks if Rothermere discussed the News Corp bid to take full control of BSkyB, announced on 15 June 2010, with Cameron, Gove or Hunt.Jay asks if Rothermere discussed the News Corp bid to take full control of BSkyB, announced on 15 June 2010, with Cameron, Gove or Hunt.
"No I did not. I am absolutely positive," says Rothermere."No I did not. I am absolutely positive," says Rothermere.
10.42am: Jay asks if Rothermere, like others, was beginning to assess the Conservative party were more likely to win the next election, or be the major force in parliament.10.42am: Jay asks if Rothermere, like others, was beginning to assess the Conservative party were more likely to win the next election, or be the major force in parliament.
"It did look like there was going to be some form of change. It's important for the company to be adaptable to that," Rothermere says."It did look like there was going to be some form of change. It's important for the company to be adaptable to that," Rothermere says.
Rothermere says he has never discussed phone hacking with government or opposition parties.Rothermere says he has never discussed phone hacking with government or opposition parties.
10.41am: Jay asks whether Rothermere attempted to get close to political parties that looked likely to be elected in order to secure political favours.10.41am: Jay asks whether Rothermere attempted to get close to political parties that looked likely to be elected in order to secure political favours.
He denies this, but adds: "It's important for us to have a good commercial relationship with all governments so they listen to what we have to say about … regulation."He denies this, but adds: "It's important for us to have a good commercial relationship with all governments so they listen to what we have to say about … regulation."
Rothermere says he met with more Conservatives as it became clear the Tories were more likely to win the 2010 general election.Rothermere says he met with more Conservatives as it became clear the Tories were more likely to win the 2010 general election.
He says the purpose was to "find out what their commercial ideas were, to familiarise ourselves with them on a commercial basis. I suspect leaders of the opposition want to try and get in with high ranking media individuals so they instigate more meetings."He says the purpose was to "find out what their commercial ideas were, to familiarise ourselves with them on a commercial basis. I suspect leaders of the opposition want to try and get in with high ranking media individuals so they instigate more meetings."
10.38am: Rothermere says he has sent two text messages to politicians: one to Nick Clegg and one to David Cameron, following the public debates before the 2010 general election saying "congratulations on a job well done".10.38am: Rothermere says he has sent two text messages to politicians: one to Nick Clegg and one to David Cameron, following the public debates before the 2010 general election saying "congratulations on a job well done".
Jay asks what Rothermere made of Dacre's friendship with Gordon Brown.Jay asks what Rothermere made of Dacre's friendship with Gordon Brown.
"I thought it was amusing and I used to tease him about it," says Rothermere. He adds that he liked Brown and was not opposed to the unlikely friendship."I thought it was amusing and I used to tease him about it," says Rothermere. He adds that he liked Brown and was not opposed to the unlikely friendship.
"Paul has an economic view of the world which is quite different to Gordon but they shared an affinity with one another which is surprising.""Paul has an economic view of the world which is quite different to Gordon but they shared an affinity with one another which is surprising."
10.36am: Jay is leading Rothermere through his diary of meetings with politicians.10.36am: Jay is leading Rothermere through his diary of meetings with politicians.
Until 2008 you were seeing more government and Lib Dem politicians than Conservative politicians, says Jay. "Yes I think that's right," Rothermere replies.Until 2008 you were seeing more government and Lib Dem politicians than Conservative politicians, says Jay. "Yes I think that's right," Rothermere replies.
Rothermere says he has known deputy prime minister Nick Clegg since he was an MEP for Leicester. "He helped us with some legislation in Europe" in the 1990s, he adds.Rothermere says he has known deputy prime minister Nick Clegg since he was an MEP for Leicester. "He helped us with some legislation in Europe" in the 1990s, he adds.
On his meetings with politicians, Rothermere says:On his meetings with politicians, Rothermere says:
They try to impress you with their vision for the country. They then might complain about the fact the paper's not supporting them. They don't talk about the commercial interests of the papers. Nor do I encourage them … Sometimes they feel the paper's been hard on them, they implore on me to have some sort of influence. I tell them that will not be the case.They try to impress you with their vision for the country. They then might complain about the fact the paper's not supporting them. They don't talk about the commercial interests of the papers. Nor do I encourage them … Sometimes they feel the paper's been hard on them, they implore on me to have some sort of influence. I tell them that will not be the case.
10.35am: Rothermere says Dacre doesn't feel the need to tell him before he launches a particular campaign.10.35am: Rothermere says Dacre doesn't feel the need to tell him before he launches a particular campaign.
When Dacre launched the plastic bag campaign, he says, "at the time we were polybagging the Sunday paper, we had to change our supplier to a biodegradable one. I said if he had given us a bit of notice we could have changed that before he launched the campaign."When Dacre launched the plastic bag campaign, he says, "at the time we were polybagging the Sunday paper, we had to change our supplier to a biodegradable one. I said if he had given us a bit of notice we could have changed that before he launched the campaign."
10.34am: Michael White, the Guardian's political commentator who is at the Leveson inquiry, has just tweeted:10.34am: Michael White, the Guardian's political commentator who is at the Leveson inquiry, has just tweeted:
#Leveson Lord Rothermere, owner of the Daily Mail, is giving evidence to hacking inquiry.He seems a nice, modest young man, very un-Murdoch.#Leveson Lord Rothermere, owner of the Daily Mail, is giving evidence to hacking inquiry.He seems a nice, modest young man, very un-Murdoch.
— MichaelWhite (@MichaelWhite) May 10, 2012— MichaelWhite (@MichaelWhite) May 10, 2012
10.29am: Rothermere is asked about the resignation of Peter Wright as editor of the Mail on Sunday.10.29am: Rothermere is asked about the resignation of Peter Wright as editor of the Mail on Sunday.
Paul Dacre felt Wright should make way for a younger editor, says Rothermere, adding there were some personal reasons.Paul Dacre felt Wright should make way for a younger editor, says Rothermere, adding there were some personal reasons.
He adds:He adds:
I think Paul [Dacre] felt Mr Wright should make way for a younger, newer editor for various reasons, some personal which I don't wish to go into. Paul wanted to retain Peter's great skill as a journalist to help him navigate a path through appropriate and ethical conduct.I think Paul [Dacre] felt Mr Wright should make way for a younger, newer editor for various reasons, some personal which I don't wish to go into. Paul wanted to retain Peter's great skill as a journalist to help him navigate a path through appropriate and ethical conduct.
10.25am: Rothermere is asked about Rupert Murdoch's comment that Mail Online is a gossip site that steals content from other sites.10.25am: Rothermere is asked about Rupert Murdoch's comment that Mail Online is a gossip site that steals content from other sites.
"Certainly, Mail Online glories in the fact that it isn't just a newspaper online," Rothermere says."Certainly, Mail Online glories in the fact that it isn't just a newspaper online," Rothermere says.
Jay asks if Mail Online pilfers material from other sites.Jay asks if Mail Online pilfers material from other sites.
"I don't get involved in that level of executive control," Rothermere says."I don't get involved in that level of executive control," Rothermere says.
Asked about Mail Online as a business, Rothermere says if the company did not invest so much of its revenue in expanding the business the website would already be profitable.Asked about Mail Online as a business, Rothermere says if the company did not invest so much of its revenue in expanding the business the website would already be profitable.
In his witness statement, Rothermere says he allows his editors to make decisions without regard to commercial considerations. Asked by Jay, he describes those considerations as "advertisers, sometimes they threaten to pull advertising".In his witness statement, Rothermere says he allows his editors to make decisions without regard to commercial considerations. Asked by Jay, he describes those considerations as "advertisers, sometimes they threaten to pull advertising".
10.23am: Rothermere is asked whether he believes the Daily Mail has ever gone too far.10.23am: Rothermere is asked whether he believes the Daily Mail has ever gone too far.
"Sometimes we have breached or appeared to breach and made apologies. I regret those instances," he replies."Sometimes we have breached or appeared to breach and made apologies. I regret those instances," he replies.
Rothermere says he can see why people feel an inquiry into the ethics of the press is necessary.Rothermere says he can see why people feel an inquiry into the ethics of the press is necessary.
"Some elements of our industry have not necessarily acted in the right way, apparently, so it is probably worthy of review," he says, adding that he is confident the Daily Mail has acted ethically. "And I am willing to stand up for us.""Some elements of our industry have not necessarily acted in the right way, apparently, so it is probably worthy of review," he says, adding that he is confident the Daily Mail has acted ethically. "And I am willing to stand up for us."
10.18am: Lord Justice Leveson asks whether politicians know they can meet Rothermere if they believe they are being treated unfairly by the Daily Mail.10.18am: Lord Justice Leveson asks whether politicians know they can meet Rothermere if they believe they are being treated unfairly by the Daily Mail.
Rothermere says by and large he will refer politicians' complaints to Paul Dacre, editor-in-chief of the Daily Mail. On occasion, Rothermere will ask Dacre to look into a specific complaint and make contact with the politician in question.Rothermere says by and large he will refer politicians' complaints to Paul Dacre, editor-in-chief of the Daily Mail. On occasion, Rothermere will ask Dacre to look into a specific complaint and make contact with the politician in question.
He says:He says:
Largely I refer them back to Paul Dacre. If there's an instance I feel justify merit I may bring that up with Paul and suggest he talk to the politician. I won't get involved on a level of opinion but if someone comes to me and says 'your newspaper has printed an untruth' I will say to Paul 'This person has written a letter – would you look into it?' They will either talk to the politician directly or write back to me and say there is no truth in it. Sometimes people have a different opinion of truth ... I don't want to get in a position of constantly having to deal with this issue.Largely I refer them back to Paul Dacre. If there's an instance I feel justify merit I may bring that up with Paul and suggest he talk to the politician. I won't get involved on a level of opinion but if someone comes to me and says 'your newspaper has printed an untruth' I will say to Paul 'This person has written a letter – would you look into it?' They will either talk to the politician directly or write back to me and say there is no truth in it. Sometimes people have a different opinion of truth ... I don't want to get in a position of constantly having to deal with this issue.
10.16am: Jay asks if Rothermere is apolitical.10.16am: Jay asks if Rothermere is apolitical.
Rothermere has been a cross-bench peer in the House of Lords. He says it is important for him not to show political preference and, therefore, lean on his editors through inference.Rothermere has been a cross-bench peer in the House of Lords. He says it is important for him not to show political preference and, therefore, lean on his editors through inference.
I think it's very important in my role not to exhibit partisan political [viewers] ... puts undue pressure on my editors to support a view they think i might have. I don't want to influence them by inference.I think it's very important in my role not to exhibit partisan political [viewers] ... puts undue pressure on my editors to support a view they think i might have. I don't want to influence them by inference.
He adds: "At times inevitably the paper will do things that makes one feel uncomfortable. At that point it stretches the notion of what I have just said."He adds: "At times inevitably the paper will do things that makes one feel uncomfortable. At that point it stretches the notion of what I have just said."
Rothermere says he tries to keep his feelings to himself, even if he believes people are being treated unfairly in his newspapers.Rothermere says he tries to keep his feelings to himself, even if he believes people are being treated unfairly in his newspapers.
10.16am: Rothermere says his family has "a fundamental belief" in the editors and entrepreneurs who run their newspapers, including the Daily Mail and Metro.10.16am: Rothermere says his family has "a fundamental belief" in the editors and entrepreneurs who run their newspapers, including the Daily Mail and Metro.
"We think this is a differentiator," he adds, pointing out that these are the principles of Lord Northcliffe."We think this is a differentiator," he adds, pointing out that these are the principles of Lord Northcliffe.
10.08am: Robert Jay QC, counsel to the inquiry, is questioning Rothermere.10.08am: Robert Jay QC, counsel to the inquiry, is questioning Rothermere.
He asks Rothermere about the success of the Daily Mail and Mail Online.He asks Rothermere about the success of the Daily Mail and Mail Online.
Rothermere believes the Daily Mail has been "built on solid ground" and a unique place in the market.Rothermere believes the Daily Mail has been "built on solid ground" and a unique place in the market.
It is built on firm ground with loyal readership – people are prepared to pay a cover price which generates 60% of our revenue.It is built on firm ground with loyal readership – people are prepared to pay a cover price which generates 60% of our revenue.
Jay asks why Rothermere is proud of Mail Online.Jay asks why Rothermere is proud of Mail Online.
Rothermere says: "It has a global footprint, one of the most looked at newspaper sites in the world ... built on a fundamental belief in a trust in journalism as opposed to technology. That's what makes me proud."Rothermere says: "It has a global footprint, one of the most looked at newspaper sites in the world ... built on a fundamental belief in a trust in journalism as opposed to technology. That's what makes me proud."
10.07am: Viscount Rothermere has taken the stand.10.07am: Viscount Rothermere has taken the stand.
Here is a profile of the Daily Mail proprietor.Here is a profile of the Daily Mail proprietor.
10.05am: Lord Justice Leveson says he has used section 21 of the Inquiries Act to "interpose" – or summon – the editor of the Independent on Sunday, John Mullin, after it published an article based on material in Andy Coulson's witness statement.10.05am: Lord Justice Leveson says he has used section 21 of the Inquiries Act to "interpose" – or summon – the editor of the Independent on Sunday, John Mullin, after it published an article based on material in Andy Coulson's witness statement.
He is the first national newspaper editor to be summoned in this way.He is the first national newspaper editor to be summoned in this way.
9.56am: Viscount Rothermere, proprietor of the Daily Mail, is expected to be today's first witness.9.56am: Viscount Rothermere, proprietor of the Daily Mail, is expected to be today's first witness.
In a rare public appearance on behalf of his company, Rothermere told a parliamentary committee in December that he felt "personal concern" at the Daily Mail's coverage of Madeleine McCann's disappearance in 2007.In a rare public appearance on behalf of his company, Rothermere told a parliamentary committee in December that he felt "personal concern" at the Daily Mail's coverage of Madeleine McCann's disappearance in 2007.
Rothermere told the committee it was his duty to "fiercely protect" the editors of his newspapers and that he had not admonished Paul Dacre for the Mail's Madeleine McCann coverage, despite the title being sued for libel by Kate and Gerry McCann.Rothermere told the committee it was his duty to "fiercely protect" the editors of his newspapers and that he had not admonished Paul Dacre for the Mail's Madeleine McCann coverage, despite the title being sued for libel by Kate and Gerry McCann.
9.41am: Andy Coulson is to give evidence this afternoon, reports the Guardian's Dan Sabbagh.9.41am: Andy Coulson is to give evidence this afternoon, reports the Guardian's Dan Sabbagh.
Leveson timetable today: Rothermere on this morning. Then Robert Jay on press and politicians. PM - Andy Coulson. Keep your diaries clear.Leveson timetable today: Rothermere on this morning. Then Robert Jay on press and politicians. PM - Andy Coulson. Keep your diaries clear.
— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 10, 2012— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 10, 2012
Gossip amongst the snappers is that Coulson has already taken the train this am; left home at 8.30am. Speculation about his likely route.Gossip amongst the snappers is that Coulson has already taken the train this am; left home at 8.30am. Speculation about his likely route.
— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 10, 2012— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 10, 2012
9.38am: David Cameron's own constituents believe he is too close to Rupert Murdoch and News Corporation executives, according to a ComRes poll carried out for the Independent.9.38am: David Cameron's own constituents believe he is too close to Rupert Murdoch and News Corporation executives, according to a ComRes poll carried out for the Independent.
The ComRes poll of 500 people in the prime minister's Witney constituency in Oxfordshire found that 49% believe Cameron is too close to the media empire, while 35% disagree.The ComRes poll of 500 people in the prime minister's Witney constituency in Oxfordshire found that 49% believe Cameron is too close to the media empire, while 35% disagree.
The poll will make uncomfortable reading for No 10, which is bracing itself for potentially damaging revelations from the evidence of Andy Coulson today and Rebekah Brooks tomorrow.The poll will make uncomfortable reading for No 10, which is bracing itself for potentially damaging revelations from the evidence of Andy Coulson today and Rebekah Brooks tomorrow.
You can read the full Independent report here.You can read the full Independent report here.
9.28am: Good morning and welcome to the Leveson inquiry live blog.9.28am: Good morning and welcome to the Leveson inquiry live blog.
Andy Coulson, former editor of the News of the World, will give evidence today as the inquiry turns its attention to module three and relations between politicians and the press.Andy Coulson, former editor of the News of the World, will give evidence today as the inquiry turns its attention to module three and relations between politicians and the press.
Coulson has been at the heart of both Fleet Street and Westminster, first as News of the World (NoW) editor from 2003 to 2007 and later as David Cameron's communications director. He resigned both posts as a result of the phone-hacking scandal.Coulson has been at the heart of both Fleet Street and Westminster, first as News of the World (NoW) editor from 2003 to 2007 and later as David Cameron's communications director. He resigned both posts as a result of the phone-hacking scandal.
The former editor is expected to face close scrutiny of his appointment by Cameron, just four months after his NotW resignation after the paper's royal reporter, Clive Goodman, pleaded guilty to phone-hacking related charges and was jailed.The former editor is expected to face close scrutiny of his appointment by Cameron, just four months after his NotW resignation after the paper's royal reporter, Clive Goodman, pleaded guilty to phone-hacking related charges and was jailed.
Coulson was arrested and bailed on 8 July 2011 by the Metropolitan police in connection with conspiracy to unlawfully intercept communications and payments to police officers. He has consistently denied any knowledge of or involvement in any criminal activity at the NotW.Coulson was arrested and bailed on 8 July 2011 by the Metropolitan police in connection with conspiracy to unlawfully intercept communications and payments to police officers. He has consistently denied any knowledge of or involvement in any criminal activity at the NotW.
The inquiry will also hear from Viscount Rothermere, chairman of Daily Mail & General Trust, publisher of the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday, Mail Online and Metro.The inquiry will also hear from Viscount Rothermere, chairman of Daily Mail & General Trust, publisher of the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday, Mail Online and Metro.
Please note that comments have been switched off for legal reasons. Please note that comments have been switched off for legal reasons.