This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/may/31/jeremy-hunt-leveson-inquiry-live

The article has changed 16 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Jeremy Hunt at the Leveson inquiry - live Jeremy Hunt at the Leveson inquiry - live
(40 minutes later)
12.28pm: We now have video of Hunt saying his phone call to Murdoch was"entirely appropriate":
12.27pm: The Guardian's editor-in-chief, Alan Rusbridger, has just tweeted:
After Dowler & NotW closure it finally dawned on Hunt tt there might be big governance issues within News Corp#Leveson
— alan rusbridger (@arusbridger) May 31, 2012
12.22pm: After the Guardian's Milly Dowler revelations in early July 2011, Hunt wrote to Ofcom and the OFT asking them whether they stood by advice from the beginning of June on the plurality issues.
Hunt says he thought in July: "Is this a company that actually doesn't have control of what's going on in its own company, even if the management don't know about it?"
He adds that he never received the advice from Ofcom and OFT because News Corp withdrew its bid for BSkyB a few days later.
12.21pm: Hunt says after the closure of the News of the World he wondered whether there was a corporate governance issue at News Corporation.
I asked myself: 'If they found it necessary to close down whole paper, is there a corporate governance issue here?'
12.20pm: Hunt says he then sought legal advice over whether phone hacking was relevant.
He says on 18 April he got legal advice that hacking could impinge if there was an issue of trust.
Hunt maintains that this was a News International issue, but did not believe there was an issue of trust with News Corp.
12.19pm: In April, News International finally dropped its "one rogue reporter defence" and admitted the practice was more widespread.
12.18pm: Hunt says that the phone-hacking issue was developing in parallel to his consideration of this bid.
On 26 January 2011, the Met police launched Operation Weeting, the investigation into phone hacking – Hunt says his perspective at this point was "it is a police matter".
12.15pm: The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh has just tweeted:
Hunt's problem in the Jan to June phase is his decision to ignore hacking issue - not his negotiations w Murdoch.
— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012
12.14pm: Ultimately, Hunt says, News Corp's purchase of the remaining shares in BSkyB without Sky News would have made the news channel "massively more independent of James Murdoch than it was then and it is now".
12.11pm: Hunt says from March to June there was consultation on News Corp's undertakings in lieu (the offer to spin off Sky News).
12.10pm: Hunt told Murdoch he had 24 hours to accede to Ofcom and the OFT's concerns on News Corp's undertakings.
12.10pm: The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh has just tweeted:
Hunt on better terrain here as he talks about negotiations with Murdoch over Sky News spin off. Murdoch was angry abt Hunt asking for it.
— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012
12.09pm: Murdoch first thought he did not need to spin off Sky News at all and was "tantamount to killing the deal," according to Hunt.
Murdoch also wanted to remain chairman of Sky News after the potential deal, which Ofcom opposed.
12.07pm: The Guardian's Paul Owen has put together a timeline of what happened on on 21 December 2010, when Hunt replaced Vince Cable as minister with responsibility for overseeing the Sky bid:
The Leveson inquiry has heard evidence from Jeremy Hunt about the day he was handed responsibility for dealing with News Corporation's bid for full control of BSkyB – and revealed a previously-unpublished text message from Hunt to James Murdoch in support of the bid earlier that day.
Vince Cable, the business secretary, was stripped of responsibility for dealing with the bid on 21 December 2010 after the BBC published comments recorded by undercover Daily Telegraph journalists in which Cable said he had "declared war" on Rupert Murdoch, comments which were interpreted as showing that he was biased against the bid.
Around midday: The European commission unconditionally approved News Corporation's bid to take full control of BSkyB on competition grounds.
12.57pm: Jeremy Hunt text to James Murdoch: "Great and congrats on Brussels. Just Ofcom to go."
2.30pm: The BBC publishes Vince Cable's comments to undercover Daily Telegraph reporters, in which the business secretary said: "I don't know if you have been following what has been happening with the Murdoch press, where I have declared war on Mr Murdoch and I think we are going to win."
3.56pm: News Corporation statement: "News Corp is shocked and dismayed by reports of Mr Cable's comments. They raise serious questions about fairness and due process."
4pm: Hunt has a phone call with James Murdoch, discussing Cable's comments.
4.08pm: Hunt texts George Osborne, the chancellor, to say he is "seriously worried we are going to screw this up" regarding the BSkyB bid, and, in a second text, says Murdoch is accusing Cable of "acute bias" over the bid.
4.58pm: Osborne texts Hunt: "I hope you like our solution."
5.45pm: Downing Street announces that Cable has been stripped of responsibility for the BSkyB decision and that responsibility has been handed to Hunt.
12.04pm: Hunt told News Corp that he would ask both OFT and Ofcom for advice on the undertakings, which did not please Murdoch.
Murdoch believed Ofcom was "hostile" to News Corp, says Hunt.
12.04pm: Hunt says he believed News Corp's undertakings in lieu – an offer to spin-off Sky News into a separate, independent company – were "a pretty big offer".
12.03pm: Hunt still believed he should refer the bid to the Competition Commission after his meeting with Richards. Then News Corp said it wanted to make undertakings in lieu in order to present a referral to the Competition Commission. Hunt says he had a legal duty to consider the bid.
11.59am: Jay asks when the minutes of Hunt's meeting with Ofcom's Richards were made available to News Corp.
Hunt says he does not know.
11.58am: Hunt then met the Ofcom chief executive, Ed Richards, on 10 January 2011.
11.55am: Hunt met News Corporation representatives on 6 January 2011, the inquiry hears.
This was a formal meeting between Hunt, other DCMS officials and Murdoch.
Ofcom told Hunt the previous week, on 31 December 2010, that there was a plurality problem with the bid which might require a referral to the Competition Commission.
Hunt told Murdoch at this meeting that he was going to refer the bid to the Competition Commission.
News Corp told Hunt at the meeting that they had concerns about Ofcom's analysis and that they wanted to consider remedies.
11.54am: ITV's Tom Bradby has just tweeted:
Hunt's passion for the public interest aspects of the decision on plurality is not terribly convincing...
— tom bradby (@tombradby) May 31, 2012
11.52am: The Guardian's Severin Carrell has just tweeted about the Andy Coulson case:
Breaking: #Coulson will "vigorously contest the perjury allegations" against him "should they ever result in trial" #hacking #leveson
— Severin Carrell (@severincarrell) May 31, 2012
11.51am: Jay turns to Hunt's handling of the bid after 22 December 2010, when he was given quasi-judicial authority by No 10.
Hunt says in his witness statement that he went further than legally necessary to seek regulatory and legal advice on the media merger.
11.50am: Hunt says he felt passionately about the public interest implications of media plurality "even more so than the commercial viability of the UK media industry".
11.47am: Hunt says:11.47am: Hunt says:
We weren't expecting 542 text messages to Mr Smith ... when you do the analysis it looks like Mr Michel was trying to contact Mr Smith five times every working day, which is an extraordinary amount we didn't anticipate at all.We weren't expecting 542 text messages to Mr Smith ... when you do the analysis it looks like Mr Michel was trying to contact Mr Smith five times every working day, which is an extraordinary amount we didn't anticipate at all.
11.46am: Hunt is pressed on Michel.11.46am: Hunt is pressed on Michel.
He says there was "was a bit of pushiness" from Michel over the bid and that his text message replies to the News Corp lobbyst "got pretty brief". He says there was "was a bit of pushiness" from Michel over the bid and that his text message replies to the News Corp lobbyist "got pretty brief".
11.43am: The inquiry resumes.11.43am: The inquiry resumes.
Hunt denies that Smith was an "extra layer of contact" with News Corp.Hunt denies that Smith was an "extra layer of contact" with News Corp.
Jay argues that the lawyers were the primary layer of contact between News Corp and the DCMS and Smith was in addition to that.Jay argues that the lawyers were the primary layer of contact between News Corp and the DCMS and Smith was in addition to that.
Hunt denies again that it was an extra layer, saying that Smith was one of several points of contact during the bid.Hunt denies again that it was an extra layer, saying that Smith was one of several points of contact during the bid.
11.41am: We now have a transcript of Hunt's texts on 21 December 2010:11.41am: We now have a transcript of Hunt's texts on 21 December 2010:
12.46: Hunt to Murdoch: Sorry to miss your call. Am on my mobile now. Jeremy12.46: Hunt to Murdoch: Sorry to miss your call. Am on my mobile now. Jeremy
12.52: Murdoch to Hunt: Have to run into next thing. Are you free anything after 2.15? I can shuffle after this12.52: Murdoch to Hunt: Have to run into next thing. Are you free anything after 2.15? I can shuffle after this
12.55: Hunt to Murdoch: How about 4?12.55: Hunt to Murdoch: How about 4?
Murdoch to Hunt: Done.Murdoch to Hunt: Done.
12.57: Hunt to Murdoch: Great and contrats on Brussels, just Ofcom to go!12.57: Hunt to Murdoch: Great and contrats on Brussels, just Ofcom to go!
16.10: Hunt to Coulson: Could we chat abvout this? Am seriously worried Vince will do real damage to coaltion with his comments …16.10: Hunt to Coulson: Could we chat abvout this? Am seriously worried Vince will do real damage to coaltion with his comments …
16.08: Hunt to Osborne: Cld we chat about Murdoch Sky bid? Am seriously worried we are going to screw this up.16.08: Hunt to Osborne: Cld we chat about Murdoch Sky bid? Am seriously worried we are going to screw this up.
16.08: Hunt to Osborne: Just been called by James M. His lawyers are meeting now & saying it calls ino question legitmach of whole process form beginning 'acute bias' etc16.08: Hunt to Osborne: Just been called by James M. His lawyers are meeting now & saying it calls ino question legitmach of whole process form beginning 'acute bias' etc
16.58 Osborne to Hunt: I hope you like the solution!16.58 Osborne to Hunt: I hope you like the solution!
11.37am: Here is a brief summary of Jeremy Hunt's evidence so far:11.37am: Here is a brief summary of Jeremy Hunt's evidence so far:
• Hunt texted James Murdoch on 21 December 2010 – hours before he was given responsibility for BSkyB bid – congratulating him on European clearance for News Corp's £8bn takeover. "Just Ofcom to go," he told Murdoch.• Hunt texted James Murdoch on 21 December 2010 – hours before he was given responsibility for BSkyB bid – congratulating him on European clearance for News Corp's £8bn takeover. "Just Ofcom to go," he told Murdoch.
• Hunt texted George Osborne saying "seriously worried we are going to screw this up" minutes after Vince Cable's anti-Murdoch remarks were made public.• Hunt texted George Osborne saying "seriously worried we are going to screw this up" minutes after Vince Cable's anti-Murdoch remarks were made public.
• Osborne replied "hope you like the solution" – a reference to No 10 handing Hunt responsibility for the controversial takeover.• Osborne replied "hope you like the solution" – a reference to No 10 handing Hunt responsibility for the controversial takeover.
• Hunt accepted he expressed a "positive view" of the BSkyB bid in a private text message to James Murdoch on 21 December 2010.• Hunt accepted he expressed a "positive view" of the BSkyB bid in a private text message to James Murdoch on 21 December 2010.
11.33am: The Guardian's Patrick Wintour has just tweeted:11.33am: The Guardian's Patrick Wintour has just tweeted:
Early possible draft of Hunt resignation letter to PM:"I hope you like the solution".Early possible draft of Hunt resignation letter to PM:"I hope you like the solution".
— Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) May 31, 2012— Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) May 31, 2012
11.29am: The inquiry is now taking a short break.11.29am: The inquiry is now taking a short break.
11.29am: Leveson asks Hunt whether it was "abundantly clear that enormous care had to be exercised" over the bid.11.29am: Leveson asks Hunt whether it was "abundantly clear that enormous care had to be exercised" over the bid.
Hunt says that is "absolutely right".Hunt says that is "absolutely right".
11.28am: The Sunday Times political correspondent Isabel Oakeshott has just tweeted:11.28am: The Sunday Times political correspondent Isabel Oakeshott has just tweeted:
Leveson says his working relationship with Smith was exceptionally close. Incompatible with his defence, that Smith was going off-pisteLeveson says his working relationship with Smith was exceptionally close. Incompatible with his defence, that Smith was going off-piste
— Isabel Oakeshott (@IsabelOakeshott) May 31, 2012— Isabel Oakeshott (@IsabelOakeshott) May 31, 2012
11.28am: The Guardian's editor-in-chief, Alan Rusbridger, has just tweeted:11.28am: The Guardian's editor-in-chief, Alan Rusbridger, has just tweeted:
Hunt on his spad, A Smith: "He heard all the things I heard abt what we needed to be careful abt" He knew my mind#LevesonHunt on his spad, A Smith: "He heard all the things I heard abt what we needed to be careful abt" He knew my mind#Leveson
— alan rusbridger (@arusbridger) May 31, 2012— alan rusbridger (@arusbridger) May 31, 2012
11.25am: Hunt agrees that Smith was "politically astute" but says he was "politically pretty neutral".11.25am: Hunt agrees that Smith was "politically astute" but says he was "politically pretty neutral".
"I doubt there's a minister who worked more closely with a special adviser than I worked with Adam Smith," he says."I doubt there's a minister who worked more closely with a special adviser than I worked with Adam Smith," he says.
He confirms that Smith knew his views on the BSkyB bid, but did not specifically ask for them.He confirms that Smith knew his views on the BSkyB bid, but did not specifically ask for them.
11.25am: The Guardian's deputy editor, Ian Katz, has just tweeted:11.25am: The Guardian's deputy editor, Ian Katz, has just tweeted:
Hunt admits Smith was given no specific instructions about how to deal with News Crp, was just present in meetings whn officials gave adviceHunt admits Smith was given no specific instructions about how to deal with News Crp, was just present in meetings whn officials gave advice
— ian katz (@iankatz1000) May 31, 2012— ian katz (@iankatz1000) May 31, 2012
11.24am: Hunt confirms he did not give Smith instructions on what not to do in his role in the BSkyB bid, adding that the special adviser knew the sensitivities.11.24am: Hunt confirms he did not give Smith instructions on what not to do in his role in the BSkyB bid, adding that the special adviser knew the sensitivities.
11.23am: Hunt says he saw Smith as an official point of contact for News Corp but not as a gobetween for Hunt and the media giant.11.23am: Hunt says he saw Smith as an official point of contact for News Corp but not as a gobetween for Hunt and the media giant.
11.21am: Hunt believed once given control of the bid that it was important to be fair and transparent. Jay asks if interactions with News Corp and opponents would have to be through official channels.11.21am: Hunt believed once given control of the bid that it was important to be fair and transparent. Jay asks if interactions with News Corp and opponents would have to be through official channels.
Hunt says he did not think courteous replies to text messages were off limits.Hunt says he did not think courteous replies to text messages were off limits.
"He adds that "any formal interactions with respect of my decisions" should be through official channels, by which he means his special adviser Adam Smith."He adds that "any formal interactions with respect of my decisions" should be through official channels, by which he means his special adviser Adam Smith.
11.21am: The BBC's Evan Davis has just tweeted:11.21am: The BBC's Evan Davis has just tweeted:
I hope they don't choose to replace one of us @BBCr4today presenters with Robert Jay.I hope they don't choose to replace one of us @BBCr4today presenters with Robert Jay.
— Evan Davis (@EvanHD) May 31, 2012— Evan Davis (@EvanHD) May 31, 2012
11.20am: The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh has just tweeted:11.20am: The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh has just tweeted:
Hunt's subdued tone and demeanour suggests that he no longer 100% confident of his actions + fateHunt's subdued tone and demeanour suggests that he no longer 100% confident of his actions + fate
— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012
11.19am: The Guardian's Patrick Wintour has just tweeted:11.19am: The Guardian's Patrick Wintour has just tweeted:
Did not Andy Coulson say he had no involvement in News Corps bid at Number 10, yet Hunt is emailing him about Cable's bias and seeking chatDid not Andy Coulson say he had no involvement in News Corps bid at Number 10, yet Hunt is emailing him about Cable's bias and seeking chat
— Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) May 31, 2012— Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) May 31, 2012
11.17am: Jay turns to the legal advice Hunt was given in the days after he had been given responsibility for the BSkyB bid.11.17am: Jay turns to the legal advice Hunt was given in the days after he had been given responsibility for the BSkyB bid.
Hunt says he believed his quasi-judicial role meant "he had to be fair to both sides" but that did not mean having an equal amount of meetings with both News Corp and opponents of the bid.Hunt says he believed his quasi-judicial role meant "he had to be fair to both sides" but that did not mean having an equal amount of meetings with both News Corp and opponents of the bid.
Because of my other duties as secretary of state I was going to be bumping into people who had views on the bid.Because of my other duties as secretary of state I was going to be bumping into people who had views on the bid.
11.16am: ITV's Tom Bradby has just tweeted:11.16am: ITV's Tom Bradby has just tweeted:
The harder questions are for Cameron. Hunt never made any secret that he was pro the bid. So why did Cameron give him responsibility for it?The harder questions are for Cameron. Hunt never made any secret that he was pro the bid. So why did Cameron give him responsibility for it?
— tom bradby (@tombradby) May 31, 2012— tom bradby (@tombradby) May 31, 2012
11.15am: The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh has just tweeted:11.15am: The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh has just tweeted:
Fascinating insight on how mod govt works - emails to personal accounts, texts between principals in moments of crisis.Fascinating insight on how mod govt works - emails to personal accounts, texts between principals in moments of crisis.
— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012
11.12am: Jay asks if the decision to give Hunt authority was made "overhastily".11.12am: Jay asks if the decision to give Hunt authority was made "overhastily".
Hunt says it was not because No 10 received legal advice.Hunt says it was not because No 10 received legal advice.
The situation demanded the government acted quickly because it was a very important merger decision … I think it was absolutely right that the prime minister acted decisively.The situation demanded the government acted quickly because it was a very important merger decision … I think it was absolutely right that the prime minister acted decisively.
11.10am: The Guardian's Lisa O'Carroll has just tweeted:11.10am: The Guardian's Lisa O'Carroll has just tweeted:
Hunt had 2 secret calls with Murdoch, texts with Murdoch and Osborne re bid. Admits he shd have minuted meetings. How long can he last?Hunt had 2 secret calls with Murdoch, texts with Murdoch and Osborne re bid. Admits he shd have minuted meetings. How long can he last?
— lisa o'carroll (@lisaocarroll) May 31, 2012— lisa o'carroll (@lisaocarroll) May 31, 2012
11.09am: "I'm not a lawyer but I would says I don't believe there is a substantive difference," says Hunt on his private remarks to Murdoch and Osborne about the bid.11.09am: "I'm not a lawyer but I would says I don't believe there is a substantive difference," says Hunt on his private remarks to Murdoch and Osborne about the bid.
He adds that it was "widely known" that he was sympathetic towards the BSkyB bid, but he was approaching it impartially.He adds that it was "widely known" that he was sympathetic towards the BSkyB bid, but he was approaching it impartially.
11.09am: The Guardian's Patrick Wintour has just tweeted:11.09am: The Guardian's Patrick Wintour has just tweeted:
Hunt says he had not been appointed to oversee bid when he texted Murdoch at 16.58 to congratulate him,only had inkling he wld be appointedHunt says he had not been appointed to oversee bid when he texted Murdoch at 16.58 to congratulate him,only had inkling he wld be appointed
— Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) May 31, 2012— Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) May 31, 2012
11.08am: Hunt argues that once given quasi-judicial authority over the bid he set up a process to set aside his sympathies.11.08am: Hunt argues that once given quasi-judicial authority over the bid he set up a process to set aside his sympathies.
11.07am: The Guardian's Josh Halliday has just tweeted:11.07am: The Guardian's Josh Halliday has just tweeted:
Sounds like George Osborne had key behind-the-scenes role in government's handling of BSkyB bid. Inconceivable he shouldn't give evidence.Sounds like George Osborne had key behind-the-scenes role in government's handling of BSkyB bid. Inconceivable he shouldn't give evidence.
— Josh Halliday (@JoshHalliday) May 31, 2012— Josh Halliday (@JoshHalliday) May 31, 2012
11.06am: Jay presses Hunt on this, asking whether he believes this showed he had an apparent bias towards the bid.11.06am: Jay presses Hunt on this, asking whether he believes this showed he had an apparent bias towards the bid.
Hunt answers "You don't appoint a quasi-judicial role with your brain wiped clean," and mantains that he "set aside" his personal view once he was given responsibility for the bid.Hunt answers "You don't appoint a quasi-judicial role with your brain wiped clean," and mantains that he "set aside" his personal view once he was given responsibility for the bid.
11.05am: Hunt says he probably would not have sent the text congratulating Murdoch on the Brussels green light if he had responsibility for the bid.11.05am: Hunt says he probably would not have sent the text congratulating Murdoch on the Brussels green light if he had responsibility for the bid.
"No I don't think I would have sent that text," he says."No I don't think I would have sent that text," he says.
Hunt was given responsibility at about 6pm that day.Hunt was given responsibility at about 6pm that day.
I don't think there's anything substantively different in my text to Mr Murdoch – it just shows I was broadly sympathetic to the bid.I don't think there's anything substantively different in my text to Mr Murdoch – it just shows I was broadly sympathetic to the bid.
11.04am: The Guardian's editor-in-chief, Alan Rusbridger, has just tweeted:11.04am: The Guardian's editor-in-chief, Alan Rusbridger, has just tweeted:
Osborne text msg to Hunt :"I hope you like our solution" (putting Hunt in charge)#LevesonOsborne text msg to Hunt :"I hope you like our solution" (putting Hunt in charge)#Leveson
— alan rusbridger (@arusbridger) May 31, 2012— alan rusbridger (@arusbridger) May 31, 2012
11.03am: Hunt agrees he knew this meant he would be put in charge but was also wary that he had made positive comments about the bid previously.11.03am: Hunt agrees he knew this meant he would be put in charge but was also wary that he had made positive comments about the bid previously.
He says he wanted No 10 not to announce him as taking charge in case these positive comments would preclude him from being able to take the role.He says he wanted No 10 not to announce him as taking charge in case these positive comments would preclude him from being able to take the role.
11.02am: Osborne replied at 4.58pm the same day saying "I hope you like the solution."11.02am: Osborne replied at 4.58pm the same day saying "I hope you like the solution."
Hunt confirms this was a reference to him being given control of the BSkyB bid after Cable's responsibility was discharged.Hunt confirms this was a reference to him being given control of the BSkyB bid after Cable's responsibility was discharged.
11.01am: The inquiry hears that Hunt texted George Osborne twice at 4.08pm, saying "seriously worried we are going to screw this up" about the BSkyB bid after Cable's comments broke.11.01am: The inquiry hears that Hunt texted George Osborne twice at 4.08pm, saying "seriously worried we are going to screw this up" about the BSkyB bid after Cable's comments broke.
Hunt texted Osborne a second time saying Murdoch was accusing Cable of "acute bias" over the bid.Hunt texted Osborne a second time saying Murdoch was accusing Cable of "acute bias" over the bid.
10.58am: Andy Coulson emailed Hunt later that day asking him to call and saying: "seriously worried Vince will do serious damage to coalition with his comments".10.58am: Andy Coulson emailed Hunt later that day asking him to call and saying: "seriously worried Vince will do serious damage to coalition with his comments".
Hunt says he does not believe he returned Coulson's message.Hunt says he does not believe he returned Coulson's message.
10.57am: Hunt discussed Cable's comments in a phone call with James Murdoch at 4pm that day, he confirms.10.57am: Hunt discussed Cable's comments in a phone call with James Murdoch at 4pm that day, he confirms.
10.56am: The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh has just tweeted:10.56am: The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh has just tweeted:
Wow - this is it surely? Hunt congratulated J Murdoch by text on getting sky bid through Brussels on Dec 21 - day he got approval job.Wow - this is it surely? Hunt congratulated J Murdoch by text on getting sky bid through Brussels on Dec 21 - day he got approval job.
— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012
10.54am: Hunt sent Murdoch a text at 12.57pm on that day saying:10.54am: Hunt sent Murdoch a text at 12.57pm on that day saying:
Great and congrats on Brussels. Just Ofcom to go.Great and congrats on Brussels. Just Ofcom to go.
Hunt accepts this was expressing a "somewhat positive view" of the fact that News Corp had been given European approval for the bid.Hunt accepts this was expressing a "somewhat positive view" of the fact that News Corp had been given European approval for the bid.
10.54am: Murdoch and Hunt texted each other to arrange a phone call for 4pm on that day, Jay says.10.54am: Murdoch and Hunt texted each other to arrange a phone call for 4pm on that day, Jay says.
Hunt says he is not sure whether he was aware of Cable's "war on Murdoch" remarks at this time because they broke on mid- to late afternoon.Hunt says he is not sure whether he was aware of Cable's "war on Murdoch" remarks at this time because they broke on mid- to late afternoon.
10.53am: Jay turns to text messages on 21 December 2010, the day Cable was discharged from his oversight of the BSkyB bid.10.53am: Jay turns to text messages on 21 December 2010, the day Cable was discharged from his oversight of the BSkyB bid.
10.52am: The Guardian's deputy editor, Ian Katz, has just tweeted:10.52am: The Guardian's deputy editor, Ian Katz, has just tweeted:
Hunt concedes Smith "self evidently knew your view on this crucial issue [view on BSky]" - therefore hard to characterise him as rogue spadHunt concedes Smith "self evidently knew your view on this crucial issue [view on BSky]" - therefore hard to characterise him as rogue spad
— ian katz (@iankatz1000) May 31, 2012— ian katz (@iankatz1000) May 31, 2012
10.51am: Michel and Smith met at the DCMS in the special advisers' room – or "spads' room" – on 6 December 2010, the inquiry hears.10.51am: Michel and Smith met at the DCMS in the special advisers' room – or "spads' room" – on 6 December 2010, the inquiry hears.
Hunt says he did not know about the meeting at the time. "Smith was the contact point with all stakeholders," he adds.Hunt says he did not know about the meeting at the time. "Smith was the contact point with all stakeholders," he adds.
10.51am: Hunt confirms that Smith knew his view on the takeover, described by Jay as a "critical issue".10.51am: Hunt confirms that Smith knew his view on the takeover, described by Jay as a "critical issue".
10.51am: The Guardian's editor-in-chief, Alan Rusbridger, has just tweeted:10.51am: The Guardian's editor-in-chief, Alan Rusbridger, has just tweeted:
Hunt "now understands quasi-judicial much better" & can see Vince C wd never hv agreed to the mtg he sought re bid #levesonHunt "now understands quasi-judicial much better" & can see Vince C wd never hv agreed to the mtg he sought re bid #leveson
— alan rusbridger (@arusbridger) May 31, 2012— alan rusbridger (@arusbridger) May 31, 2012
10.50am: Hunt confirms he made the second draft of the memo, in which the "wrong place not just politically" reference was removed and the warning about "caving in" to opponents of the bid was beefed up.10.50am: Hunt confirms he made the second draft of the memo, in which the "wrong place not just politically" reference was removed and the warning about "caving in" to opponents of the bid was beefed up.
10.49am: Jay asks why Hunt called for a high-level meeting with David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Vince Cable.10.49am: Jay asks why Hunt called for a high-level meeting with David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Vince Cable.
Hunt says he wanted the meeting because of the media policy implications, but adds:Hunt says he wanted the meeting because of the media policy implications, but adds:
I now realise it would not have been possible for Vince Cable to attend such a meeting.I now realise it would not have been possible for Vince Cable to attend such a meeting.
10.46am: Jay asks what Hunt means by "wrong place in terms of media policy".10.46am: Jay asks what Hunt means by "wrong place in terms of media policy".
Hunt explains he has a concern that the model of the newspaper industry is not viable in the long term, and saw this bid "as an opportunity to help modernise the industry".Hunt explains he has a concern that the model of the newspaper industry is not viable in the long term, and saw this bid "as an opportunity to help modernise the industry".
He says he was "sympathetic" towards the bid, when asked by Jay whether he was supportive of it.He says he was "sympathetic" towards the bid, when asked by Jay whether he was supportive of it.
10.44am: Hunt confirms he drafted the original memo.10.44am: Hunt confirms he drafted the original memo.
He is asked what he meant by warning that the Tories could "end up in the wrong place not just politically" if they blocked the BSkyB bid.He is asked what he meant by warning that the Tories could "end up in the wrong place not just politically" if they blocked the BSkyB bid.
Hunt explains that the Tories are traditionally a free market, pro-competition party and blocking such a business deal would have been inconsistent with their policy.Hunt explains that the Tories are traditionally a free market, pro-competition party and blocking such a business deal would have been inconsistent with their policy.
"I don't think there's any political win in any possible outcome as far as a Conservative-led government is concerned," he adds."I don't think there's any political win in any possible outcome as far as a Conservative-led government is concerned," he adds.
10.43am: Hunt is asked about his private memo to David Cameron on 19 November 2010.10.43am: Hunt is asked about his private memo to David Cameron on 19 November 2010.
In the draft, Hunt wrote:In the draft, Hunt wrote:
James Murdoch is pretty furious at Vince's referral to Ofcom. He doesn't think he will get a fair hearing from Ofcom. I am privately concerned about this because News Corp are very litigious and we could end up in the wrong place in terms of media policy. Essentially what James Murdoch wants to do is to repeat what his father did with the move to Wapping and create the world's first multiplatform media operator available from paper to web to TV to iPhone to iPad. Isn't this what all media companies have to do ultimately? And if so we must be very careful that any attempt to block it is done on plurality grounds and not as a result of lobbying by competitors.James Murdoch is pretty furious at Vince's referral to Ofcom. He doesn't think he will get a fair hearing from Ofcom. I am privately concerned about this because News Corp are very litigious and we could end up in the wrong place in terms of media policy. Essentially what James Murdoch wants to do is to repeat what his father did with the move to Wapping and create the world's first multiplatform media operator available from paper to web to TV to iPhone to iPad. Isn't this what all media companies have to do ultimately? And if so we must be very careful that any attempt to block it is done on plurality grounds and not as a result of lobbying by competitors.
The UK has the chance to lead the way on this as we did in the 80s with the Wapping move but if we block it our media sector will suffer for years. In the end I am sure sensible controls can be put into any merger to ensure there is plurality but I think it would be totally wrong to cave into the Mark Thompson/Channel 4/Guardian line that this represents a substantial change of control given that we all know Sky is controlled by News Corp now anyway.The UK has the chance to lead the way on this as we did in the 80s with the Wapping move but if we block it our media sector will suffer for years. In the end I am sure sensible controls can be put into any merger to ensure there is plurality but I think it would be totally wrong to cave into the Mark Thompson/Channel 4/Guardian line that this represents a substantial change of control given that we all know Sky is controlled by News Corp now anyway.
What next? Ofcom will issue their report saying whether it needs to go to the Competition Commission by 31 December. It would be totally wrong for the government to get involved in a competition issue which has to be decided at arm's length. However I do think you, I, Vince and the DPM [deputy prime minister] should meet to discuss the policy issues that are thrown up as a result.What next? Ofcom will issue their report saying whether it needs to go to the Competition Commission by 31 December. It would be totally wrong for the government to get involved in a competition issue which has to be decided at arm's length. However I do think you, I, Vince and the DPM [deputy prime minister] should meet to discuss the policy issues that are thrown up as a result.
10.40am: Hunt says he "just heard Mr Murdoch out" over the telephone. If he had wanted a meeting we would have said we could not intervene, he adds.10.40am: Hunt says he "just heard Mr Murdoch out" over the telephone. If he had wanted a meeting we would have said we could not intervene, he adds.
Murdoch used "colourful language" to express his frustration over the process, Hunt says.Murdoch used "colourful language" to express his frustration over the process, Hunt says.
10.39am: The Guardian's editor-in-chief, Alan Rusbridger, has just tweeted:10.39am: The Guardian's editor-in-chief, Alan Rusbridger, has just tweeted:
Hunt admits spoke to J Murdoch on mb phone, despite all legal & official advice. It was "entirely appropriate"#levesonHunt admits spoke to J Murdoch on mb phone, despite all legal & official advice. It was "entirely appropriate"#leveson
— alan rusbridger (@arusbridger) May 31, 2012— alan rusbridger (@arusbridger) May 31, 2012
10.38am: Hunt spoke to Murdoch on his mobile phone around this time.10.38am: Hunt spoke to Murdoch on his mobile phone around this time.
Hunt maintains this was not a replacement for the meeting cancelled after legal advice.Hunt maintains this was not a replacement for the meeting cancelled after legal advice.
Michel told Murdoch on 15 November 2010: "You could have a chat with him on his mobile which is completely fine and I will liaise with his team privately as well."Michel told Murdoch on 15 November 2010: "You could have a chat with him on his mobile which is completely fine and I will liaise with his team privately as well."
10.38am: Hunt says he now believes it is a good idea to have officials present when meeting media owners because of the "massive number of conspiracy theories about".10.38am: Hunt says he now believes it is a good idea to have officials present when meeting media owners because of the "massive number of conspiracy theories about".
10.38am: Hunt says he was told that it was appropriate to have meetings with "stakeholders" where minutes were taken and officials were present. It was at his discretion to have unminuted meetings with no officials present, he adds.10.38am: Hunt says he was told that it was appropriate to have meetings with "stakeholders" where minutes were taken and officials were present. It was at his discretion to have unminuted meetings with no officials present, he adds.
10.37am: Jay asks if Hunt was frustrated, as Michel claimed.10.37am: Jay asks if Hunt was frustrated, as Michel claimed.
Hunt says:Hunt says:
I may have been frustrated. I was worried about a bid in my sector which could meant that thousands more jobs would be created and the main protagonists were concerned … So I may well have been worried.I may have been frustrated. I was worried about a bid in my sector which could meant that thousands more jobs would be created and the main protagonists were concerned … So I may well have been worried.
10.36am: On 15 November 2010, Michel emailed Murdoch saying about Hunt:10.36am: On 15 November 2010, Michel emailed Murdoch saying about Hunt:
Hunt meeting – urgent. Jeremy tried to call you. He has received very strong legal advice not to meet us today as the current process is treated as a judicial one (not a policy one) and any meeting could be referred to and jeopardise the entire process.Hunt meeting – urgent. Jeremy tried to call you. He has received very strong legal advice not to meet us today as the current process is treated as a judicial one (not a policy one) and any meeting could be referred to and jeopardise the entire process.
Hunt says he does not believe he spoke to Michel before the News Corp lobbyist sent this email. He may have had a conversation with Adam Smith, Hunt says.Hunt says he does not believe he spoke to Michel before the News Corp lobbyist sent this email. He may have had a conversation with Adam Smith, Hunt says.
10.35am: Hunt received further legal advice on 7 December 2010 stating "that's probably not what JS [Jonathan Stephens, the permanent secretary] and JH wanted to hear".10.35am: Hunt received further legal advice on 7 December 2010 stating "that's probably not what JS [Jonathan Stephens, the permanent secretary] and JH wanted to hear".
10.35am: The Guardian's deputy editor, Ian Katz, has tweeted:10.35am: The Guardian's deputy editor, Ian Katz, has tweeted:
Why was Hunt's private email the only one he used, if not to avoid FOI? #LevesonWhy was Hunt's private email the only one he used, if not to avoid FOI? #Leveson
— ian katz (@iankatz1000) May 31, 2012— ian katz (@iankatz1000) May 31, 2012
10.31am: Jay turns to the legal advice given to Hunt on 19 November 2010.10.31am: Jay turns to the legal advice given to Hunt on 19 November 2010.
He was told it would be "unwise" to make an intervention on the BSkyB bid.He was told it would be "unwise" to make an intervention on the BSkyB bid.
10.30am: Hunt explains that November 2010 was the first time he heard the phrase "quasi-judicial".10.30am: Hunt explains that November 2010 was the first time he heard the phrase "quasi-judicial".
"I thought I had an absolutely duty to be across the most important issue in that industry," he adds."I thought I had an absolutely duty to be across the most important issue in that industry," he adds.
10.29am: Hunt says:10.29am: Hunt says:
I think I had a concern about the situation where we had this very important, very significant merger in my sector where I didn't think there was a particular problem with it, but the organisation concerned said they did feel they were facing a number of obstacles with it.I think I had a concern about the situation where we had this very important, very significant merger in my sector where I didn't think there was a particular problem with it, but the organisation concerned said they did feel they were facing a number of obstacles with it.
10.28am: Hunt says he was asking for his "locus to express an opinion that might be taken into consideration by Dr Cable".10.28am: Hunt says he was asking for his "locus to express an opinion that might be taken into consideration by Dr Cable".
He interpreted the advice to mean he should not have an external conversation that could be seen as an intervention in Cable's oversight of the bid.He interpreted the advice to mean he should not have an external conversation that could be seen as an intervention in Cable's oversight of the bid.
Hunt adds that he did not believe he could not speak to industry figures about the bid.Hunt adds that he did not believe he could not speak to industry figures about the bid.
10.27am: The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh has just tweeted:10.27am: The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh has just tweeted:
Just been shown a sheet of Michel/Hunt texts. Nov 16 from FM to JH "thanks for the call with james today...Just been shown a sheet of Michel/Hunt texts. Nov 16 from FM to JH "thanks for the call with james today...
— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012
andand
...greatly appreciated will work with adam to make sure we can send you helpful arguments"...greatly appreciated will work with adam to make sure we can send you helpful arguments"
— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012
10.27am: Jay turns to Hunt's meeting with James Murdoch on 12 November 2010.10.27am: Jay turns to Hunt's meeting with James Murdoch on 12 November 2010.
Hunt received legal advice on that same day to "not have external discussions about the bid" nor write to Vince Cable.Hunt received legal advice on that same day to "not have external discussions about the bid" nor write to Vince Cable.
10.25am: Jay shows Hunt an email of 2 November 2010 and then on 9 November 2010 from Michel asking him to "meet JRM" on 15 November 2010.10.25am: Jay shows Hunt an email of 2 November 2010 and then on 9 November 2010 from Michel asking him to "meet JRM" on 15 November 2010.
Hunt texted back: "Great."Hunt texted back: "Great."
10.24am: The Guardian's deputy editor, Ian Katz, has just tweeted:10.24am: The Guardian's deputy editor, Ian Katz, has just tweeted:
Some useful reading for Hunt at #Leveson. Bogdanor bit.ly/LQmj44Timeline bit.ly/I97mLM Cameron memo bit.ly/LjbrfkSome useful reading for Hunt at #Leveson. Bogdanor bit.ly/LQmj44Timeline bit.ly/I97mLM Cameron memo bit.ly/Ljbrfk
— ian katz (@iankatz1000) May 31, 2012— ian katz (@iankatz1000) May 31, 2012
10.23am: Hunt says he does not believe other officials knew he received the briefing documents "nor would I have made a secret of it".10.23am: Hunt says he does not believe other officials knew he received the briefing documents "nor would I have made a secret of it".
Asked why Smith sent the email to Hunt's personal account, the minister says that is the only email account he uses; his private secretary looks after his official DCMS account.Asked why Smith sent the email to Hunt's personal account, the minister says that is the only email account he uses; his private secretary looks after his official DCMS account.
10.22am: Hunt is asked about the briefing documents from News Corp he described as "very powerful" in an email to Adam Smith, his special adviser.10.22am: Hunt is asked about the briefing documents from News Corp he described as "very powerful" in an email to Adam Smith, his special adviser.
Hunt explains that he did not believe there was a "major plurality issue" in the media merger.Hunt explains that he did not believe there was a "major plurality issue" in the media merger.
10.20am: Hay asks how well Hunt knew Michel.10.20am: Hay asks how well Hunt knew Michel.
Hunt says he never socialised with Michel but got to know him well because they both had children in the same hospital at the same time.Hunt says he never socialised with Michel but got to know him well because they both had children in the same hospital at the same time.
10.19am: Hunt says he met Rebekah Brooks and Frédéric Michel at the Conservative conference in October 2010.10.19am: Hunt says he met Rebekah Brooks and Frédéric Michel at the Conservative conference in October 2010.
He adds that the News Corp pair complained they would not get a fair hearing from Vince Cable.He adds that the News Corp pair complained they would not get a fair hearing from Vince Cable.
Hunt says that he may have expressed surprise that Cable believed there may have been a plurality issue with the bid.Hunt says that he may have expressed surprise that Cable believed there may have been a plurality issue with the bid.
10.17am: Hunt says he was told it was acceptable and at his discretion whether to have meetings with News Corp executives.10.17am: Hunt says he was told it was acceptable and at his discretion whether to have meetings with News Corp executives.
He admits having an unminuted meeting with Murdoch with no officials present on 20 June.He admits having an unminuted meeting with Murdoch with no officials present on 20 June.
The Sky bid was probably discussed, he says.The Sky bid was probably discussed, he says.
10.16am: Jay presses Hunt on when he first learned of News Corp's BSkyB bid.10.16am: Jay presses Hunt on when he first learned of News Corp's BSkyB bid.
Hunt says he is not sure whether he was told about the bid before it was publicly announced, adding:Hunt says he is not sure whether he was told about the bid before it was publicly announced, adding:
My view was that the Murdochs controlled BSkyB … so I didn't think there was a significant change in plurality.My view was that the Murdochs controlled BSkyB … so I didn't think there was a significant change in plurality.
10.14am: Hunt is asked whether he hid behind a tree to avoid being spotted at a party at which Murdoch was present.10.14am: Hunt is asked whether he hid behind a tree to avoid being spotted at a party at which Murdoch was present.
The Daily Telegraph's Iain Martin offers his first-hand account of the incident here.The Daily Telegraph's Iain Martin offers his first-hand account of the incident here.
Hunt says he spotted a large group of media journalists outside the entrance and thought "this is not the time to have an impromptu interview and so I moved into a different quadrangle".Hunt says he spotted a large group of media journalists outside the entrance and thought "this is not the time to have an impromptu interview and so I moved into a different quadrangle".
"There may or may not have been trees," Hunt adds, before Leveson urges Jay to move on."There may or may not have been trees," Hunt adds, before Leveson urges Jay to move on.
10.12am: Hunt met News Corp executives on a trip to New York in September 2009.10.12am: Hunt met News Corp executives on a trip to New York in September 2009.
He had "general discussions" with News Corp executives about broadcasting, but Murdoch was in London at the time. They spoke about impartiality rules, he says.He had "general discussions" with News Corp executives about broadcasting, but Murdoch was in London at the time. They spoke about impartiality rules, he says.
10.11am: Jay asks if Hunt agreed with Murdoch on "top slicing" the BBC licence fee.10.11am: Jay asks if Hunt agreed with Murdoch on "top slicing" the BBC licence fee.
"Generally speaking I didn't agree with him on the licence fee, full stop," Hunt says."Generally speaking I didn't agree with him on the licence fee, full stop," Hunt says.
He points out that Murdoch opposes the licence fee completely, whereas Hunt believes the BBC is an "important benchmark" for broadcasting quality.He points out that Murdoch opposes the licence fee completely, whereas Hunt believes the BBC is an "important benchmark" for broadcasting quality.
10.08am: Hunt says he disagreed with the thrust of Murdoch's MacTaggart lecture remarks on the BBC.10.08am: Hunt says he disagreed with the thrust of Murdoch's MacTaggart lecture remarks on the BBC.
Murdoch described the corporation's size and ambitions as "chilling" and accused it of mounting a "land grab" in a beleaguered media market.Murdoch described the corporation's size and ambitions as "chilling" and accused it of mounting a "land grab" in a beleaguered media market.
You can read the full text of his speech here.You can read the full text of his speech here.
10.07am: Jay asks about meetings with James Murdoch.10.07am: Jay asks about meetings with James Murdoch.
In one meeting, Hunt and Murdoch spoke about reforming Ofcom.In one meeting, Hunt and Murdoch spoke about reforming Ofcom.
Hunt says his focus in the meeting was local TV and superfast broadband but "I did not manage to excite much interest from him in either of those two issues."Hunt says his focus in the meeting was local TV and superfast broadband but "I did not manage to excite much interest from him in either of those two issues."
10.07am: The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh has just tweeted:10.07am: The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh has just tweeted:
Hunt looks a little weary, but focused on being outwardly calm.Hunt looks a little weary, but focused on being outwardly calm.
— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012
10.05am: Hunt is asked about the comments on his personal website praising Rupert Murdoch's contribution to the British economy.10.05am: Hunt is asked about the comments on his personal website praising Rupert Murdoch's contribution to the British economy.
He explains that this section on his website feature press articles about him and that comment was by a journalist from Broadcast magazine "but it's not how I would describe myself".He explains that this section on his website feature press articles about him and that comment was by a journalist from Broadcast magazine "but it's not how I would describe myself".
Hunt says he puts up "positive or negative" comments on his website because he believes they are helpful to his constituents.Hunt says he puts up "positive or negative" comments on his website because he believes they are helpful to his constituents.
10.04am: Hunt has been an MP since 2005, shadow culture secretary, then culture secretary from May 2010.10.04am: Hunt has been an MP since 2005, shadow culture secretary, then culture secretary from May 2010.
10.02am: Culture secretary Jeremy Hunt is sworn in and has taken the witness stand.10.02am: Culture secretary Jeremy Hunt is sworn in and has taken the witness stand.
Robert Jay QC, lead counsel to the inquiry, is leading the questioning.Robert Jay QC, lead counsel to the inquiry, is leading the questioning.
9.52am: The Guardian's John Plunkett has sent us this picture from outside the Royal Courts of Justice of protesters wearing Hunt and Cameron masks:9.52am: The Guardian's John Plunkett has sent us this picture from outside the Royal Courts of Justice of protesters wearing Hunt and Cameron masks:
9.51am: Hunt has submitted more than 160 pages of internal memos, emails and text messages to the Leveson inquiry, according to the BBC's political editor Nick Robinson.9.51am: Hunt has submitted more than 160 pages of internal memos, emails and text messages to the Leveson inquiry, according to the BBC's political editor Nick Robinson.
Robinson reports that Hunt originally believed that Adam Smith, his special adviser, had done nothing wrong in his contacts with News Corp's Frédéric Michel and that the culture secretary was prepared to resign himself.Robinson reports that Hunt originally believed that Adam Smith, his special adviser, had done nothing wrong in his contacts with News Corp's Frédéric Michel and that the culture secretary was prepared to resign himself.
9.51am: The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh has just tweeted:9.51am: The Guardian's Dan Sabbagh has just tweeted:
My hunch: Jeremy Hunt has a 'fairly good' day; fends off the critics for a bit. But will he be culture sec long after the Olympics?My hunch: Jeremy Hunt has a 'fairly good' day; fends off the critics for a bit. But will he be culture sec long after the Olympics?
— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012— Dan Sabbagh (@dansabbagh) May 31, 2012
9.42am: The Guardian's Patrick Wintour has just tweeted:9.42am: The Guardian's Patrick Wintour has just tweeted:
J hunt seems to be briefing he offered to resign since he did not think, like his perm sect and the cab sect,his special adviser had erredJ hunt seems to be briefing he offered to resign since he did not think, like his perm sect and the cab sect,his special adviser had erred
— Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) May 31, 2012— Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) May 31, 2012
andand
George Osborne is being reported as privately having opposed leveson's broad terms of reference.George Osborne is being reported as privately having opposed leveson's broad terms of reference.
— Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) May 31, 2012— Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) May 31, 2012
andand
Labour will seek post-hunt evidence that cameron ask ind adviser on min code investigate hunt. If Cam says no, it is close to clearing Hunt.Labour will seek post-hunt evidence that cameron ask ind adviser on min code investigate hunt. If Cam says no, it is close to clearing Hunt.
— Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) May 31, 2012— Patrick Wintour (@patrickwintour) May 31, 2012
9.40am: Sky News's Mark White has posted video on Twitter of protesters wearing Hunt masks doing the lambada:9.40am: Sky News's Mark White has posted video on Twitter of protesters wearing Hunt masks doing the lambada:
9.30am: Here is the list of questions Dan Sabbagh, Josh Halliday and Lisa O'Carroll ask Jeremy Hunt in the Guardian today:9.30am: Here is the list of questions Dan Sabbagh, Josh Halliday and Lisa O'Carroll ask Jeremy Hunt in the Guardian today:
1. Why did you agree to talk to James Murdoch on the telephone on 15 November, when you had been explicitly told by your permanent secretary that you could not meet him? Were you seeking to get information from him that could be used to influence David Cameron and pressurise Vince Cable?1. Why did you agree to talk to James Murdoch on the telephone on 15 November, when you had been explicitly told by your permanent secretary that you could not meet him? Were you seeking to get information from him that could be used to influence David Cameron and pressurise Vince Cable?
2. Why did you draft a memo to the prime minister on 19 November, after having spoken to a "pretty furious" James Murdoch, asking that he intervene to rein in Vince Cable – after you had been told by the DCMS legal director, Patrick Kilgarriff, that it would be unwise to get involved?2. Why did you draft a memo to the prime minister on 19 November, after having spoken to a "pretty furious" James Murdoch, asking that he intervene to rein in Vince Cable – after you had been told by the DCMS legal director, Patrick Kilgarriff, that it would be unwise to get involved?
3. What did you mean when you wrote that the coalition "could end up in the wrong place in terms of media policy" and that it would be a mistake to "cave in" to opponents of the bid? Why did you think it was appropriate to ask the prime minister to lean on Cable?3. What did you mean when you wrote that the coalition "could end up in the wrong place in terms of media policy" and that it would be a mistake to "cave in" to opponents of the bid? Why did you think it was appropriate to ask the prime minister to lean on Cable?
4. Why did you tone down your original memo? Why did you write in an earlier draft that the Tories "could end up in the wrong place politically?" Were you concerned that the Conservatives would lose the support of News Corporation and its newspapers? Did your conversation with James Murdoch on 15 November give rise to that concern?4. Why did you tone down your original memo? Why did you write in an earlier draft that the Tories "could end up in the wrong place politically?" Were you concerned that the Conservatives would lose the support of News Corporation and its newspapers? Did your conversation with James Murdoch on 15 November give rise to that concern?
5. Did you have any further discussion with Cameron, Osborne or other Conservative ministers after sending the memo as regards trying to influence Cable in the quasi-judicial process? And why did you tell parliament on 25 April 2012 that you made "absolutely no interventions seeking to influence a quasi-judicial decision that was at that time the responsibility of the secretary of state for business"?5. Did you have any further discussion with Cameron, Osborne or other Conservative ministers after sending the memo as regards trying to influence Cable in the quasi-judicial process? And why did you tell parliament on 25 April 2012 that you made "absolutely no interventions seeking to influence a quasi-judicial decision that was at that time the responsibility of the secretary of state for business"?
6. When Gus O'Donnell was asked to determine if you could be an objective judge of the BSkyB bid, did you make him aware of the 19 November memo you wrote to the prime minister? If not, why not? Was it because it would have revealed the appearance of bias on your part?6. When Gus O'Donnell was asked to determine if you could be an objective judge of the BSkyB bid, did you make him aware of the 19 November memo you wrote to the prime minister? If not, why not? Was it because it would have revealed the appearance of bias on your part?
7. Adam Smith said he knew "very much what [you] thought" and received an excellent performance review in December 2011. Given his acknowledged talent and knowledge of your ways of working, how can you maintain that you were unaware of "volume and tone" of Smith's contacts with Fred Michel during the bid?7. Adam Smith said he knew "very much what [you] thought" and received an excellent performance review in December 2011. Given his acknowledged talent and knowledge of your ways of working, how can you maintain that you were unaware of "volume and tone" of Smith's contacts with Fred Michel during the bid?
8. Did you receive any advice about whether it was appropriate for you to consider the phone-hacking issue as relevant to your decision on the Sky bid? If so, what did that advice state, and when was it received? Why did you continue to insist that concern about hacking was immaterial to the bid – particular given that it was the reason the bid collapsed?8. Did you receive any advice about whether it was appropriate for you to consider the phone-hacking issue as relevant to your decision on the Sky bid? If so, what did that advice state, and when was it received? Why did you continue to insist that concern about hacking was immaterial to the bid – particular given that it was the reason the bid collapsed?
9. Were you aware that News Corp had been given an early copy of your 3 March 2011 statement to parliament on the proposed undertakings in lieu? Was it appropriate for your special adviser to be texting Michel at 3am with advance details of your Commons statement? Were you also aware that Michel believed he was passed information "although absolutely illegal" by your department on 23 January 2011?9. Were you aware that News Corp had been given an early copy of your 3 March 2011 statement to parliament on the proposed undertakings in lieu? Was it appropriate for your special adviser to be texting Michel at 3am with advance details of your Commons statement? Were you also aware that Michel believed he was passed information "although absolutely illegal" by your department on 23 January 2011?
10. Why did you hide behind a tree to avoid being seen by Wall Street Journal journalist Iain Martin at an evening event on 20 May 2010 where James Murdoch had just given a speech? What did you discuss at the subsequent dinner; were you tipped off about the impending BSkyB bid? Is is fair to say that you "wanted to be close to News International, and to have dinner with Murdoch, but didn't want to be seen as being close to News International"?10. Why did you hide behind a tree to avoid being seen by Wall Street Journal journalist Iain Martin at an evening event on 20 May 2010 where James Murdoch had just given a speech? What did you discuss at the subsequent dinner; were you tipped off about the impending BSkyB bid? Is is fair to say that you "wanted to be close to News International, and to have dinner with Murdoch, but didn't want to be seen as being close to News International"?
9.23am: Good morning and welcome to the Leveson inquiry.9.23am: Good morning and welcome to the Leveson inquiry.
Embattled culture secretary Jeremy Hunt will face sustained questioning today as the inquiry turns its focus to his dealings with Rupert Murdoch's media empire.Embattled culture secretary Jeremy Hunt will face sustained questioning today as the inquiry turns its focus to his dealings with Rupert Murdoch's media empire.
Hunt will be pressed on his controversial handling of News Corp's £8bn BSkyB takeover bid as the minister fights to save his political future.Hunt will be pressed on his controversial handling of News Corp's £8bn BSkyB takeover bid as the minister fights to save his political future.
Hunt has faced mounting questions about his apparent bias in favour of the News Corp bid since the inquiry published 160 pages of emails between his key aide, Adam Smith, and the News Corp lobbyist Frédéric Michel in April.Hunt has faced mounting questions about his apparent bias in favour of the News Corp bid since the inquiry published 160 pages of emails between his key aide, Adam Smith, and the News Corp lobbyist Frédéric Michel in April.
Hunt will be questioned for almost seven hours on whether he repeatedly misled parliament about his position on the bid, repeatedly claiming that he had made no interventions on the bid before he took control and had no unofficial contact with Michel.Hunt will be questioned for almost seven hours on whether he repeatedly misled parliament about his position on the bid, repeatedly claiming that he had made no interventions on the bid before he took control and had no unofficial contact with Michel.
Documents revealed at the inquiry show that Hunt wrote a pointed memo to David Cameron in November 2010 in support of the bid on the same day he was given legal advice not to. He also exchanged a string of text messages with Michel while exercising quasi-judicial oversight of the media merger.Documents revealed at the inquiry show that Hunt wrote a pointed memo to David Cameron in November 2010 in support of the bid on the same day he was given legal advice not to. He also exchanged a string of text messages with Michel while exercising quasi-judicial oversight of the media merger.
The inquiry begins at 10am.The inquiry begins at 10am.