This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18688191#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
G20 death: PC accepts it was 'wrong' to hit Tomlinson G20 death: PC accepts it was 'wrong' to hit Tomlinson
(about 2 hours later)
A PC accused of killing Ian Tomlinson accepts he was "wrong" to hit and push the newspaper seller, a court heard.A PC accused of killing Ian Tomlinson accepts he was "wrong" to hit and push the newspaper seller, a court heard.
PC Simon Harwood, 45, of south London, denies the 2009 manslaughter of Mr Tomlinson, 47, during the G20 protests.PC Simon Harwood, 45, of south London, denies the 2009 manslaughter of Mr Tomlinson, 47, during the G20 protests.
The officer told Southwark Crown Court if he had realised Mr Tomlinson was walking away from police lines at the time he "would not have gone near him".The officer told Southwark Crown Court if he had realised Mr Tomlinson was walking away from police lines at the time he "would not have gone near him".
Mr Tomlinson was hit with a baton and shoved to the ground before dying minutes later in the City of London.Mr Tomlinson was hit with a baton and shoved to the ground before dying minutes later in the City of London.
Pc Harwood told investigators in 2009 that his actions had been justified based on the threat officers faced from the crowds. PC Harwood told investigators in 2009 that his actions had been justified based on the threat officers faced from the crowds.
But cross-examining, Mark Dennis QC suggested to the officer that he had "made up" this state of mind for his defence. But cross-examining, Mark Dennis QC suggested to the Met Police officer that he had "made up" this state of mind for his defence.
"When we look at that video, we are not looking at someone who is a greenhorn, attending his first incident of violence," said Mr Dennis."When we look at that video, we are not looking at someone who is a greenhorn, attending his first incident of violence," said Mr Dennis.
"No," said the officer."No," said the officer.
'Shock at footage''Shock at footage'
Mr Dennis asked PC Harwood: "You do now accept that what you did in relation to Mr Tomlinson was wrong?"Mr Dennis asked PC Harwood: "You do now accept that what you did in relation to Mr Tomlinson was wrong?"
Harwood replied: "Like I said, now I do, but not at the time." PC Harwood replied: "Like I said, now I do, but not at the time."
He went on: "Now I've seen all the evidence and I know how poorly Mr Tomlinson was I'm sorry that I got involved, I shouldn't have hit him with a baton and pushed him."He went on: "Now I've seen all the evidence and I know how poorly Mr Tomlinson was I'm sorry that I got involved, I shouldn't have hit him with a baton and pushed him."
Looking at a photograph of Mr Tomlinson, who was an alcoholic and slept rough for a number of years, PC Harwood said he would rank him as an eight out of 10, where 10 was a fully fit person.Looking at a photograph of Mr Tomlinson, who was an alcoholic and slept rough for a number of years, PC Harwood said he would rank him as an eight out of 10, where 10 was a fully fit person.
Mr Tomlinson's family walked out of court as the officer went through a list of his options when he came across the 47-year-old.Mr Tomlinson's family walked out of court as the officer went through a list of his options when he came across the 47-year-old.
He listed using a baton, a push, kicks, punches, CS spray, handcuffs, his voice or firearms.He listed using a baton, a push, kicks, punches, CS spray, handcuffs, his voice or firearms.
Mr Dennis asked PC Harwood: "You have to be aware that the person you are dealing with may, for example, have a frailty?"
He replied: "Yes."
Mr Dennis told PC Harwood he had adopted a "strike first, ask questions afterwards" approach.
He then went through footage of the lead-up to PC Harwood's interaction with Mr Tomlinson, asking the officer how he could have believed there was a riot going on near the Royal Exchange Buildings at the time.
PC Harwood said: "That's what I could see, that's what I remember, that's what I believed I was dealing with."
The prosecutor said: "I suggest you're not telling the truth at all when you say 'what I saw at the time', and this is your last line of defence now that you've been caught out on video acting improperly."
PC Harwood replied: "No, I disagree."
The officer said he had a "brief second to assess and react" to Mr Tomlinson.
Prosecutors claim that PC Harwood's "blood was up" after he tried and failed to arrest a protester for scrawling graffiti on a police carrier.
Mr Dennis asked: "Was the blood still up then?"
"I don't remember my blood being up, no, I was acting professionally," PC Harwood replied.
Jurors were shown footage of him shoving another protester minutes before coming across Mr Tomlinson, who he said was obstructing police.
'Shock and horror'
Earlier, PC Harwood told the jury of his "shock" and "horror" as he watched the footage of his push.Earlier, PC Harwood told the jury of his "shock" and "horror" as he watched the footage of his push.
Patrick Gibbs QC, defending, asked the officer what he had then felt.Patrick Gibbs QC, defending, asked the officer what he had then felt.
"Horror, to think it could be me and what it could lead to.""Horror, to think it could be me and what it could lead to."
"You looked at it and thought it was you?" asked Mr Gibbs."You looked at it and thought it was you?" asked Mr Gibbs.
Mr Dennis asked Harwood: "You have to be aware that the person you are dealing with may, for example, have a frailty?" "Yes," replied PC Harwood.
He replied: "Yes."
"Yes," replied Pc Harwood.
"Did you want to believe it was you?""Did you want to believe it was you?"
"No.""No."