This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/us-news-blog/2012/jul/03/us-government-requests-twitter-info

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Government requests for user info threaten free speech, advocates warn Government requests for user info threaten free speech, advocates warn
(35 minutes later)
Free speech advocates have warned that online communications are being stifled by the growing efforts of US authorities to obtain records of messages posted on forums like Twitter.Free speech advocates have warned that online communications are being stifled by the growing efforts of US authorities to obtain records of messages posted on forums like Twitter.
A judge in New York this week ruled that Twitter must release three months of an Occupy Wall Street protester's online communications, and the website's owners have published data that shows the US government is by far the most energetic pursuer of information about its users.A judge in New York this week ruled that Twitter must release three months of an Occupy Wall Street protester's online communications, and the website's owners have published data that shows the US government is by far the most energetic pursuer of information about its users.
Martin Stolar, an attorney for Malcolm Harris, one of 732 Occupy Wall Street protesters arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge roadway in New York last October, said warned of a chilling effect on free speech. "It sort of puts a damper on communication and peoples' ability to freely communicate if they know the government is going to be intercepting," he said.Martin Stolar, an attorney for Malcolm Harris, one of 732 Occupy Wall Street protesters arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge roadway in New York last October, said warned of a chilling effect on free speech. "It sort of puts a damper on communication and peoples' ability to freely communicate if they know the government is going to be intercepting," he said.
Prosecutors have pursued Twitter for details of Harris's tweets spanning three months in an attempt to find out whether he disobeyed police orders.Prosecutors have pursued Twitter for details of Harris's tweets spanning three months in an attempt to find out whether he disobeyed police orders.
Protesters argue that police did not give clear directions during the march, and in June a federal judge ruled that police had failed to give sufficient warnings against walking on the roadway. But Harris still faces a disorderly conduct charge.Protesters argue that police did not give clear directions during the march, and in June a federal judge ruled that police had failed to give sufficient warnings against walking on the roadway. But Harris still faces a disorderly conduct charge.
The decision to force Twitter to release Harris's tweets was handed down on the same day as a "transparency report" from the site, the first of its kind. The report logs the request for user information filed with Twitter by governments around the world. The United States has filed the most by far, with 679 such requests since January 1; Japan was a distant second with 98, and the United Kingdom came in third with 11.The decision to force Twitter to release Harris's tweets was handed down on the same day as a "transparency report" from the site, the first of its kind. The report logs the request for user information filed with Twitter by governments around the world. The United States has filed the most by far, with 679 such requests since January 1; Japan was a distant second with 98, and the United Kingdom came in third with 11.
Elie Mystal, editor of US legal blog Above The Law, said the legal ruling isn't a game-changer. "If you think about it, anything you tweet is 'public'," wrote Mystal in an email Tuesday. "If I wanted to use them against you, I could. If you tweeted 'I'm gonna stab Elie in the face' and then later I am stabbed in the face, certainly I would be allowed to look at your Twitter account and read that you had previously expressed your face-stabbing desire."Elie Mystal, editor of US legal blog Above The Law, said the legal ruling isn't a game-changer. "If you think about it, anything you tweet is 'public'," wrote Mystal in an email Tuesday. "If I wanted to use them against you, I could. If you tweeted 'I'm gonna stab Elie in the face' and then later I am stabbed in the face, certainly I would be allowed to look at your Twitter account and read that you had previously expressed your face-stabbing desire."
Stolar, though, said the decision showed an outdated notion about the way people communicate. "I think the judge's opinion is from the last century," Stolar said.Stolar, though, said the decision showed an outdated notion about the way people communicate. "I think the judge's opinion is from the last century," Stolar said.
Last year, Sam Jewler relied heavily on Twitter to circulate an Occupy-published newspaper and raise awareness about voter representation in Washington DC. He said activists are aware – and wary – of the consequences.Last year, Sam Jewler relied heavily on Twitter to circulate an Occupy-published newspaper and raise awareness about voter representation in Washington DC. He said activists are aware – and wary – of the consequences.
"I think it's one of those mostly unspoken things that [people] are aware could happen," Jewler wrote in a Twitter message Tuesday. "We have to expect anything we post online to be used against us. If only government were so transparent.""I think it's one of those mostly unspoken things that [people] are aware could happen," Jewler wrote in a Twitter message Tuesday. "We have to expect anything we post online to be used against us. If only government were so transparent."
Twitter said in a statement on Tuesday that it was "disappointed" with the decision. "Twitter's terms of service have long made it absolutely clear that its users own their content," the statement read. "We continue to have a steadfast commitment to our users and their rights."Twitter said in a statement on Tuesday that it was "disappointed" with the decision. "Twitter's terms of service have long made it absolutely clear that its users own their content," the statement read. "We continue to have a steadfast commitment to our users and their rights."
In a statement, chief assistant district attorney Daniel Alonso said he was "pleased that the court has ruled for a second time that the Tweets at issue must be turned over".In a statement, chief assistant district attorney Daniel Alonso said he was "pleased that the court has ruled for a second time that the Tweets at issue must be turned over".
He added: "We look forward to Twitter's complying and to moving forward with the trial." Harris's trial is expected to begin in December.He added: "We look forward to Twitter's complying and to moving forward with the trial." Harris's trial is expected to begin in December.
CommentsComments
2 comments, displaying first2 comments, displaying first
4 July 2012 9:33AM4 July 2012 9:33AM
Activists become wary of what information they post publiclyActivists become wary of what information they post publicly
Oh no, you can be held accoutable for posting things publicly.Oh no, you can be held accoutable for posting things publicly.
What is the world coming to?What is the world coming to?
Link to this comment:Link to this comment:
4 July 2012 9:35AM4 July 2012 9:35AM
Here's a tip for anyone who is too thick to get social media - if you say something online, this is like sticking it up in a public place. Anyone can read it, and if it contains something that gets the attention of the authorities, they are well within their rights to find out who put it up.Here's a tip for anyone who is too thick to get social media - if you say something online, this is like sticking it up in a public place. Anyone can read it, and if it contains something that gets the attention of the authorities, they are well within their rights to find out who put it up.
I couldn't go into a pub and start shouting and then expect nobody to do anything.I couldn't go into a pub and start shouting and then expect nobody to do anything.
Link to this comment:Link to this comment:
Comments on this page are now closed.Comments on this page are now closed.
Occupy Wall Street protester vows to fight subpoena over Twitter accountOccupy Wall Street protester vows to fight subpoena over Twitter account
7 Feb 20127 Feb 2012
Malcolm Harris's lawyer says order from prosecutors which demands release of three months' worth of tweets is improperMalcolm Harris's lawyer says order from prosecutors which demands release of three months' worth of tweets is improper
14 Sep 201214 Sep 2012
Twitter complies with prosecutors to surrender Occupy activist's tweetsTwitter complies with prosecutors to surrender Occupy activist's tweets
8 May 20128 May 2012
Twitter sides with Occupy protester in NY court battle over tweet historyTwitter sides with Occupy protester in NY court battle over tweet history
2 May 2012
Occupy Wall Street panel: has May Day made a difference?
30 Apr 201230 Apr 2012
Occupy May Day protesters sense chance to regain autumn momentumOccupy May Day protesters sense chance to regain autumn momentum
3 Feb 2012
Q&A with Naomi Wolf: what next for the Occupy movement?Q&A with Naomi Wolf: what next for the Occupy movement?
Twitter revelations prompt MPs and peers to examine privacy rules 3 Feb 2012
23 May 2011 Naomi Wolf: What should the Occupy movement do, after the occupations? The author and activist joined us for a live webchat
Decision comes after David Cameron says it is 'unsustainable' to prevent press from reporting information posted on the site
Turn autoplay offTurn autoplay off
Turn autoplay onTurn autoplay on
Please activate cookies in order to turn autoplay offPlease activate cookies in order to turn autoplay off
Edition: UKEdition: UK
About usAbout us
Today's paperToday's paper
SubscribeSubscribe
Activists become wary of what information they post publicly as Twitter releases report on efforts to obtain user informationActivists become wary of what information they post publicly as Twitter releases report on efforts to obtain user information
Free speech advocates have warned that online communications are being stifled by the growing efforts of US authorities to obtain records of messages posted on forums like Twitter.Free speech advocates have warned that online communications are being stifled by the growing efforts of US authorities to obtain records of messages posted on forums like Twitter.
A judge in New York this week ruled that Twitter must release three months of an Occupy Wall Street protester's online communications, and the website's owners have published data that shows the US government is by far the most energetic pursuer of information about its users.A judge in New York this week ruled that Twitter must release three months of an Occupy Wall Street protester's online communications, and the website's owners have published data that shows the US government is by far the most energetic pursuer of information about its users.
Martin Stolar, an attorney for Malcolm Harris, one of 732 Occupy Wall Street protesters arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge roadway in New York last October, said warned of a chilling effect on free speech. "It sort of puts a damper on communication and peoples' ability to freely communicate if they know the government is going to be intercepting," he said.Martin Stolar, an attorney for Malcolm Harris, one of 732 Occupy Wall Street protesters arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge roadway in New York last October, said warned of a chilling effect on free speech. "It sort of puts a damper on communication and peoples' ability to freely communicate if they know the government is going to be intercepting," he said.
Prosecutors have pursued Twitter for details of Harris's tweets spanning three months in an attempt to find out whether he disobeyed police orders.Prosecutors have pursued Twitter for details of Harris's tweets spanning three months in an attempt to find out whether he disobeyed police orders.
Protesters argue that police did not give clear directions during the march, and in June a federal judge ruled that police had failed to give sufficient warnings against walking on the roadway. But Harris still faces a disorderly conduct charge.Protesters argue that police did not give clear directions during the march, and in June a federal judge ruled that police had failed to give sufficient warnings against walking on the roadway. But Harris still faces a disorderly conduct charge.
The decision to force Twitter to release Harris's tweets was handed down on the same day as a "transparency report" from the site, the first of its kind. The report logs the request for user information filed with Twitter by governments around the world. The United States has filed the most by far, with 679 such requests since January 1; Japan was a distant second with 98, and the United Kingdom came in third with 11.The decision to force Twitter to release Harris's tweets was handed down on the same day as a "transparency report" from the site, the first of its kind. The report logs the request for user information filed with Twitter by governments around the world. The United States has filed the most by far, with 679 such requests since January 1; Japan was a distant second with 98, and the United Kingdom came in third with 11.
Elie Mystal, editor of US legal blog Above The Law, said the legal ruling isn't a game-changer. "If you think about it, anything you tweet is 'public'," wrote Mystal in an email Tuesday. "If I wanted to use them against you, I could. If you tweeted 'I'm gonna stab Elie in the face' and then later I am stabbed in the face, certainly I would be allowed to look at your Twitter account and read that you had previously expressed your face-stabbing desire."Elie Mystal, editor of US legal blog Above The Law, said the legal ruling isn't a game-changer. "If you think about it, anything you tweet is 'public'," wrote Mystal in an email Tuesday. "If I wanted to use them against you, I could. If you tweeted 'I'm gonna stab Elie in the face' and then later I am stabbed in the face, certainly I would be allowed to look at your Twitter account and read that you had previously expressed your face-stabbing desire."
Stolar, though, said the decision showed an outdated notion about the way people communicate. "I think the judge's opinion is from the last century," Stolar said.Stolar, though, said the decision showed an outdated notion about the way people communicate. "I think the judge's opinion is from the last century," Stolar said.
Last year, Sam Jewler relied heavily on Twitter to circulate an Occupy-published newspaper and raise awareness about voter representation in Washington DC. He said activists are aware – and wary – of the consequences.Last year, Sam Jewler relied heavily on Twitter to circulate an Occupy-published newspaper and raise awareness about voter representation in Washington DC. He said activists are aware – and wary – of the consequences.
"I think it's one of those mostly unspoken things that [people] are aware could happen," Jewler wrote in a Twitter message Tuesday. "We have to expect anything we post online to be used against us. If only government were so transparent.""I think it's one of those mostly unspoken things that [people] are aware could happen," Jewler wrote in a Twitter message Tuesday. "We have to expect anything we post online to be used against us. If only government were so transparent."
Twitter said in a statement on Tuesday that it was "disappointed" with the decision. "Twitter's terms of service have long made it absolutely clear that its users own their content," the statement read. "We continue to have a steadfast commitment to our users and their rights."Twitter said in a statement on Tuesday that it was "disappointed" with the decision. "Twitter's terms of service have long made it absolutely clear that its users own their content," the statement read. "We continue to have a steadfast commitment to our users and their rights."
In a statement, chief assistant district attorney Daniel Alonso said he was "pleased that the court has ruled for a second time that the Tweets at issue must be turned over".In a statement, chief assistant district attorney Daniel Alonso said he was "pleased that the court has ruled for a second time that the Tweets at issue must be turned over".
He added: "We look forward to Twitter's complying and to moving forward with the trial." Harris's trial is expected to begin in December.He added: "We look forward to Twitter's complying and to moving forward with the trial." Harris's trial is expected to begin in December.