This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/southern_counties/5319376.stm

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Couple win court fight over villa Couple win court fight over villa
(about 1 hour later)
A Sussex couple seeking to keep their dream holiday villa in northern Cyprus have won their High Court battle.A Sussex couple seeking to keep their dream holiday villa in northern Cyprus have won their High Court battle.
Linda and David Orams, from Hove, built their property in Turkish-controlled northern Cyprus four years ago after buying the plot with retirement funds.Linda and David Orams, from Hove, built their property in Turkish-controlled northern Cyprus four years ago after buying the plot with retirement funds.
They were taken to court by Meletios Apostolides, who said his family owned the land, near Kyrenia, in the 1970s.They were taken to court by Meletios Apostolides, who said his family owned the land, near Kyrenia, in the 1970s.
He had insisted that either the villa was knocked down or the Orams handed their property in Sussex over to him.He had insisted that either the villa was knocked down or the Orams handed their property in Sussex over to him.
Mr Orams, 61, and his wife, 59, spent their £160,000 savings on buying the plot and building the villa and pool.Mr Orams, 61, and his wife, 59, spent their £160,000 savings on buying the plot and building the villa and pool.
'Substantial victory''Substantial victory'
They bought the land from the registered owner in accordance with the laws and land registry system of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) - which was declared after Turkish troops invaded the area in 1974.They bought the land from the registered owner in accordance with the laws and land registry system of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) - which was declared after Turkish troops invaded the area in 1974.
But Mr Apostolides, a Greek Cypriot, insisted the land was rightfully his because his family had been uprooted from it by the Turkish invasion.But Mr Apostolides, a Greek Cypriot, insisted the land was rightfully his because his family had been uprooted from it by the Turkish invasion.
A statement issued on behalf of the couple said the judgment was a "total vindication" of their position.A statement issued on behalf of the couple said the judgment was a "total vindication" of their position.
It said: "It is a substantial victory in a battle by them to maintain and retain their retirement home and their home in England.It said: "It is a substantial victory in a battle by them to maintain and retain their retirement home and their home in England.
"The judgment allows others in the same position to invest in TRNC without the threat of enforcement of judgments rendered in the Republic of Cyprus in the EU.""The judgment allows others in the same position to invest in TRNC without the threat of enforcement of judgments rendered in the Republic of Cyprus in the EU."
We feel we've never done anything wrong and we are very happy with the result Linda Orams
Their counsel, Cherie Booth QC, had argued that the case raised a matter of fundamental importance for people who lived in the Turkish-controlled region in relation to property dealings.Their counsel, Cherie Booth QC, had argued that the case raised a matter of fundamental importance for people who lived in the Turkish-controlled region in relation to property dealings.
Mr Justice Jack's ruling that a judgement obtained against the retired couple in Nicosia was not enforceable in the English courts followed a four-day hearing at the High Court in London in July.Mr Justice Jack's ruling that a judgement obtained against the retired couple in Nicosia was not enforceable in the English courts followed a four-day hearing at the High Court in London in July.
The judge gave Mr Apostolides, who was not in court, permission to appeal.
He also ordered that he should pay 75% of the Orams' £863,000 costs, with an interim payment of £150,000 - although £75,000 of that will be stayed, pending appeal.
The remaining £75,000 has to be paid within 28 days.
Speaking outside the court Mrs Orams said the couple were very happy.
"It's been two years and a hard struggle. We feel we've never done anything wrong and we are very happy with the result," she said.
"We have every faith in English justice and the EU.
"We realise it's not the end. It's just the beginning of the long road but we have every confidence that we will win the second appeal."