This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-19311364#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Expensive council homes should be sold, says Policy Exchange think tank Expensive council homes should be sold, says Policy Exchange think tank
(about 4 hours later)
 
Councils should sell off their most expensive houses and reinvest the money in building cheaper homes, the Policy Exchange think tank has said.Councils should sell off their most expensive houses and reinvest the money in building cheaper homes, the Policy Exchange think tank has said.
Selling top homes when they become vacant would raise £4.5bn a year, enough to build 80,000 to 170,000 new social homes, providing building jobs.Selling top homes when they become vacant would raise £4.5bn a year, enough to build 80,000 to 170,000 new social homes, providing building jobs.
It says social tenants deserve a roof over their heads but not one that is better than most people can afford.It says social tenants deserve a roof over their heads but not one that is better than most people can afford.
The National Housing Federation said it may lead to a form of social cleansing.The National Housing Federation said it may lead to a form of social cleansing.
In its Ending Expensive Social Tenancies report, Policy Exchange argues the move could create the largest social house building programme since the 1970s - giving the economy a kickstart. In its Ending Expensive Social Tenancies report, Policy Exchange, which is seen as being close to Prime Minister David Cameron and has influenced government policy in the past, argues the move could create the largest social house building programme since the 1970s - giving the economy a kickstart.
Housing Minister Grant Shapps has described the recommendation as "blindingly obvious". Neil O'Brien, the think tank's director, told the BBC that social housing would still exist in very expensive areas under their proposal, but there would just be "less off it".
But critics say such a move would push the least well-off out of expensive streets, and into new ghettos. "The truth is I don't believe anybody has the right to live in the most expensive parts of town.
'Costly and unpopular' "People do have a right to get housed, just not in the very most expensive areas," he said.
He also suggested that the overall number of people waiting for social housing, currently around 1.8 million, could be reduced by about 500,000 if the scheme is implemented.
'Lucky family'
Expensive social housing - which Policy Exchange defines as housing worth more than the average property in each region - accounts for 21.8% of the total social housing stock in the UK, it says.Expensive social housing - which Policy Exchange defines as housing worth more than the average property in each region - accounts for 21.8% of the total social housing stock in the UK, it says.
This equates to 816,000 properties - out of a total of 3.78 million - which the think tank says could raise up to £159bn if sold.This equates to 816,000 properties - out of a total of 3.78 million - which the think tank says could raise up to £159bn if sold.
It says London alone has more than £70bn of expensive social housing.It says London alone has more than £70bn of expensive social housing.
Alex Morton, the report's author, commented: "Expensive social housing is costly, unpopular and unfair. That is why almost everybody rejects it.
"Social housing tenants deserve a roof over their heads - but not one better than most people can afford, particularly as expensive social housing means less social housing and so longer waiting lists for most people in need."
About 3.5% of the total stock becomes vacant every year owing to people moving out or dying, the think tank said.About 3.5% of the total stock becomes vacant every year owing to people moving out or dying, the think tank said.
This meant the government could sell a total of 28,500 properties each year, raising £5.5bn a year - the figure would stand at £4.5bn after paying off the debt held against the stock, the report said.This meant the government could sell a total of 28,500 properties each year, raising £5.5bn a year - the figure would stand at £4.5bn after paying off the debt held against the stock, the report said.
Policy Exchange argued that many hardworking people might want to live in a nicer area or in a bigger house but could not afford to. Allowing one family to live in expensive social housing means leaving many other people on the housing waiting list, it said. Mr O'Brien argued that many hardworking people might want to live in a nicer area or in a bigger house but could not afford to.
It argued for a regional cap on the value of social properties. "Rather than having one lucky family with a very expensive house, you would have two families perhaps desperately waiting for social housing, now having a roof over their heads.
'Get Britain building' "That seems fairer to me," he added.
It also said the move would be "extremely popular" with all sections of society, claiming that 73% of people, including social tenants, think people should not be given council houses worth more than the average property in a local authority. The think tank also said the move would be "extremely popular" with all sections of society, claiming that 73% of people, including social tenants, think people should not be given council houses worth more than the average property in a local authority.
It said the plan would also raise tenants' standards of living. 'Dramatic erosion'
But the National Housing Federation, which represents housing associations, says many towns would be "cleansed" of "hardworking people who can't afford to pay high prices". Critics say such a move would push the least well-off out of expensive streets, and into new ghettos.
The National Housing Federation, which represents housing associations, says many towns would be "cleansed" of "hardworking people who can't afford to pay high prices".
Labour MP Karen Buck, who represents Westminster North, is concerned that lower income families, particularly in London, will be forced out of more affluent areas creating segregated communities of rich and poor.
She told BBC Radio 4: "Effectively the outcome [of what is proposed] is to reduce the stock of properties for lower income households, many of whose communities have lived there forever, in favour of an inflated, overseas, money driven housing market.
"It's a process of erosion, quite dramatic erosion, because we would be getting rid of another third of all social housing from these communities over the course a decade... properties that already exist."
Ms Buck also argued that the Labour government's £8bn social and affordable housing building programme was cut by 60% when the coalition came to power.
Housing Minister Grant Shapps - who is in favour of a sell-off - said the government had introduced "radical reforms" to "get Britain building" and to reduce social housing waiting lists.Housing Minister Grant Shapps - who is in favour of a sell-off - said the government had introduced "radical reforms" to "get Britain building" and to reduce social housing waiting lists.
They included investing £19.5bn public and private funding into an affordable housing programme "set to exceed expectations and deliver up to 170,000 homes".They included investing £19.5bn public and private funding into an affordable housing programme "set to exceed expectations and deliver up to 170,000 homes".
Councils could now offer fixed-term tenancies to new tenants to make sure "social housing goes to those in greatest need", he added.Councils could now offer fixed-term tenancies to new tenants to make sure "social housing goes to those in greatest need", he added.
Do you agree with the think tank's suggestion? Is it the best way to improve the housing supply? Are you a social tenant? Send us your comments and experiences using the form below.