This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/31/pentagon-legal-action-bin-laden

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Pentagon considers legal action against Bin Laden raid author Pentagon considers legal action against Bin Laden raid author
(7 months later)
The Pentagon is considering legal action against a former US Navy Seal whose book describes insider details of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.The Pentagon is considering legal action against a former US Navy Seal whose book describes insider details of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden.
Officials said on Friday that the US military had not made a final judgment on whether the book reveals any secrets, but Pentagon press secretary George Little said the author, Matt Bissonnette, was deemed to be in violation of two nondisclosure agreements that he signed in 2007 by failing to submit the book for an official security review.Officials said on Friday that the US military had not made a final judgment on whether the book reveals any secrets, but Pentagon press secretary George Little said the author, Matt Bissonnette, was deemed to be in violation of two nondisclosure agreements that he signed in 2007 by failing to submit the book for an official security review.
Bissonnette's lawyer disputed this, saying he believes the decorated former Seal has "earned the right to tell his story."Bissonnette's lawyer disputed this, saying he believes the decorated former Seal has "earned the right to tell his story."
In his book, Bissonnette wrote that the Seals spotted Bin Laden at the top of a darkened hallway at his home in Pakistan and shot him in the head, even though they could not tell whether he was armed. Administration officials have described the Seals as shooting him Bin Laden only after he ducked into a bedroom because they assumed he might be reaching for a weapon.In his book, Bissonnette wrote that the Seals spotted Bin Laden at the top of a darkened hallway at his home in Pakistan and shot him in the head, even though they could not tell whether he was armed. Administration officials have described the Seals as shooting him Bin Laden only after he ducked into a bedroom because they assumed he might be reaching for a weapon.
Little would not say what legal options the Pentagon is considering or when it might take action.Little would not say what legal options the Pentagon is considering or when it might take action.
"I write to formally advise you of your material breach and violation of your agreements, and to inform you that the department is considering pursuing against you, and all those acting in concert with you, all remedies legally available to us in light of this situation," Jeh Johnson, the Pentagon's top lawyer, wrote in a letter faxed to the author Thursday through his publisher."I write to formally advise you of your material breach and violation of your agreements, and to inform you that the department is considering pursuing against you, and all those acting in concert with you, all remedies legally available to us in light of this situation," Jeh Johnson, the Pentagon's top lawyer, wrote in a letter faxed to the author Thursday through his publisher.
In response, Robert D Luskin of the law firm Patton Boggs wrote to Johnson on Friday to say that his firm is representing Bissonnette and asserting that his client is not in breach of his nondisclosure agreements.In response, Robert D Luskin of the law firm Patton Boggs wrote to Johnson on Friday to say that his firm is representing Bissonnette and asserting that his client is not in breach of his nondisclosure agreements.
Luskin, who represented White House aide Karl Rove in the leak of CIA agent Valerie Plame's identity in the Bush administration, said the author had "sought legal advice about his responsibilities before agreeing to publish his book, and scrupulously reviewed the work to ensure that it did not disclose any material that would breach his agreements or put his former comrades at risk. He remains confident that he has faithfully fulfilled his duty."Luskin, who represented White House aide Karl Rove in the leak of CIA agent Valerie Plame's identity in the Bush administration, said the author had "sought legal advice about his responsibilities before agreeing to publish his book, and scrupulously reviewed the work to ensure that it did not disclose any material that would breach his agreements or put his former comrades at risk. He remains confident that he has faithfully fulfilled his duty."
Little suggested that if Bissonnette were to stop the book's official release, scheduled for next week, that might be a remedy. Some advance copies have been circulating, and the Pentagon obtained one last week. It has since been reviewing it for any classified information and to determine what, if any, legal action should be taken, Little said.Little suggested that if Bissonnette were to stop the book's official release, scheduled for next week, that might be a remedy. Some advance copies have been circulating, and the Pentagon obtained one last week. It has since been reviewing it for any classified information and to determine what, if any, legal action should be taken, Little said.
"The onus is on the author," Little said, while declining to spell out what the author must do."The onus is on the author," Little said, while declining to spell out what the author must do.
But the publisher was firm on Friday. "At this time, we see no reason to change our plans," said Dutton spokesperson Christine Ball.But the publisher was firm on Friday. "At this time, we see no reason to change our plans," said Dutton spokesperson Christine Ball.
It was highly unlikely that the government would try to halt publication of the book itself, considering the book is already in the public domain and media reports have summarized its contents.It was highly unlikely that the government would try to halt publication of the book itself, considering the book is already in the public domain and media reports have summarized its contents.
The justice department could go after the profits of the book in a civil proceeding. Department spokesman Dean Boyd declined any comment on the book Friday.The justice department could go after the profits of the book in a civil proceeding. Department spokesman Dean Boyd declined any comment on the book Friday.
Retired CIA agent Frank Snepp published a book about his CIA activities in South Vietnam without submitting it to the agency for prepublication review.Retired CIA agent Frank Snepp published a book about his CIA activities in South Vietnam without submitting it to the agency for prepublication review.
The government sued to collect all profits, and the court ruled in the government's favor. The government did not contend that Snepp's book contained any classified material.The government sued to collect all profits, and the court ruled in the government's favor. The government did not contend that Snepp's book contained any classified material.
In its 6-3 ruling in 1980, the supreme curt said: "Undisputed evidence in this case shows that a CIA agent's violation of his obligation to submit writings about the agency for prepublication review impairs the CIA's ability to perform its statutory duties."In its 6-3 ruling in 1980, the supreme curt said: "Undisputed evidence in this case shows that a CIA agent's violation of his obligation to submit writings about the agency for prepublication review impairs the CIA's ability to perform its statutory duties."
If the Pentagon determines that the Bin Laden book does disclose secrets, that would open the possibility of bringing federal criminal charges against Bissonnette. The potential charges and penalties would depend largely on what type of secrets were disclosed.If the Pentagon determines that the Bin Laden book does disclose secrets, that would open the possibility of bringing federal criminal charges against Bissonnette. The potential charges and penalties would depend largely on what type of secrets were disclosed.
Little declined to describe the Pentagon's assessment of the contents of the book, but he later said it had not reached "any final conclusions" about whether secrets were revealed.Little declined to describe the Pentagon's assessment of the contents of the book, but he later said it had not reached "any final conclusions" about whether secrets were revealed.
The Pentagon's position was presented by Johnson in a letter transmitted to the author through his New York publisher, Penguin's Dutton imprint.The Pentagon's position was presented by Johnson in a letter transmitted to the author through his New York publisher, Penguin's Dutton imprint.
Johnson said Bissonnette's nondisclosure agreements obliged him to "never divulge" classified information.Johnson said Bissonnette's nondisclosure agreements obliged him to "never divulge" classified information.
"This commitment remains in force even after you left the active duty Navy," Johnson wrote. He said the author left active duty "on or about April 20, 2012," which was nearly one year after the May 2011 raid."This commitment remains in force even after you left the active duty Navy," Johnson wrote. He said the author left active duty "on or about April 20, 2012," which was nearly one year after the May 2011 raid.
guardian.co.uk today is our daily snapshot of the top news stories, sent to your inbox at 8am