This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/education/6904298.stm

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 7 Version 8
Pledge for a 'skills revolution' Pledge for a 'skills revolution'
(about 1 hour later)
The government has pledged to boost Britain's skills base with a "demand-led" approach and better links between employers and education.The government has pledged to boost Britain's skills base with a "demand-led" approach and better links between employers and education.
Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills, John Denham, said the aim was to make the UK a world leader in skills by 2020.Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills, John Denham, said the aim was to make the UK a world leader in skills by 2020.
The proposals include an adult careers service for England. They follow the Leitch report on skills. The proposals include an adult careers service for England and individual "skills accounts" to fund training.
Lord Leitch said the UK lagged behind in adult literacy and numeracy. Colleges will have to change to be more responsive to learners and employers.
Speaking in the Commons, John Denham said: "We will bring about a skills revolution and close the gap between where we are now and where we need to be in 2020. Speaking in the Commons, John Denham said: "We will bring about a skills revolution and close the gap between where we are now and where we need to be in 2020."
"Our ambition is to ensure that this country becomes a world leader in skills by 2020." Targets
'World leader' target A key report on the UK's lack of skills, by Lord Leitch, recommended raising the age of compulsory education from 16 to 18. This has already been taken up by Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
Lord Leitch's key recommendation that the age for compulsory education should rise from 16 to 18 has already been taken up by Prime Minister Gordon Brown. The government also accepted a target Leitch set for 95% of adults to have basic skills in literacy and numeracy, with the aim of 1.1 million more people achieving this over the next three years.
His report, published in December, said five million adults lacked "functional literacy" while more than 17 million had problems with numbers. Mr Denham said it wanted a "skills revolution", in which vocational training was "employer-led" and demand-led, so that colleges would aim to provide training in what local people or businesses wanted.
Lord Leitch had urged ministers to commit to a "compelling new vision" and to become a world leader in skills by 2020. He announced the setting up a new careers service for adults in England, which would offer advice on training, job-seeking and childcare.
The government accepted a target he had set for 95% of adults to have basic skills in literacy and numeracy, with the aim of 1.1 million more people achieving this over the next three years. The number of apprenticeships would be increased and there would be a new entitlement for 19 to 25-year-olds to free training to Level 2, equivalent to five good GCSEs.
Mr Denham said the government wanted a "skills revolution", in which vocational training was "employer-led" and demand-led, so that colleges would aim to provide training in what local people or businesses wanted.
"We must ensure the rising generation starts working life with higher qualifications and higher skills," he said.
He announced the setting up a new career service for adults in England, which would offer advice on training, job-seeking and childcare.
The number of apprenticeships would be increased and there would be a new entitlement to free training for 19 to 25-year-olds, he said.
This statement should have been a recognition that we needed a change from the failed approach of the past David Willetts, shadow universities and skills secretaryThis statement should have been a recognition that we needed a change from the failed approach of the past David Willetts, shadow universities and skills secretary
He also said a new UK commission for employment and skills, set up after a recommendation from Lord Leitch, would be reviewed in 2010.He also said a new UK commission for employment and skills, set up after a recommendation from Lord Leitch, would be reviewed in 2010.
Mr Denham said if more people improved their skills, they would have access to better jobs, help cut child poverty and lead to "higher aspirations and better opportunities for their children". Mr Denham told journalists he wanted a culture change, so if someone was moaning about being in a dead-end job their best friend would ask them what they were doing to improve their skills.
Shadow universities and skills secretary David Willetts said the government had "downgraded" its ambitions. Skills accounts - giving them funding equivalent to perhaps £1,500 - would empower people to talk with colleges about what they wanted to achieve.
He agreed with the government's aims but the "centrally planned system" was failing to deliver on promises made for more than 10 years. The other main plank of funding would be via employers through the Train 2 Gain programme.
"This statement should have been a recognition that we needed a change from the failed approach of the past." Leitch had suggested directing all funding through that by 2010. The government's judgement was that it had to move more slowly so as not to destabilise colleges' funding.
He completely agreed that a demand- led and employer-driven system was needed. But colleges that had thought they could get through the next three years unscathed "are going to have to change", Mr Denham said.
Recognition
The Association of Colleges said it welcomed the government's plans.
Chief executive John Brennan said: "Colleges look forward to playing a major role in the delivery of the plan, and welcome in particular the commitment to pilot opportunities to develop their own qualifications, to extend the brokerage role of providers and the creation of a universal careers service."
However, they wanted to see more employers paying for training and being held accountable for the nation's skills.
CBI director general Richard Lambert said the system needed to give greater recognition to the £33bn spent by employers on raising workers' skills.
Otherwise there was a risk of "chasing qualifications for their own sake" with very little impact on productivity.
Ministers have said they are working on the detail of giving greater external recognition to employers' own training programmes.
But the National Union of Students was concerned that the demands of specific employers would have too significant a role to play, at the expense of individuals' development.
Shadow universities and skills secretary David Willetts said he completely agreed that a demand-led and employer-driven system was needed.
"But in order to deliver that type of system we need a tough-minded and rigorous assessment of how our skills policies need to change, and in reality that is not, I'm afraid, what we've had today," he said."But in order to deliver that type of system we need a tough-minded and rigorous assessment of how our skills policies need to change, and in reality that is not, I'm afraid, what we've had today," he said.
The Liberal Democrats said the proposals amounted to a series of re-announcements. The Liberal Democrats said the proposals amounted to a series of reannouncements.
The Association of Colleges said it welcomed the government's response to the Leitch report.
Chief executive John Brennan said: "We are delighted the government has risen to the challenge and set out this ambitious plan for action.
"Colleges look forward to playing a major role in the delivery of the plan, and welcome in particular the commitment to pilot opportunities to develop their own qualifications, to extend the brokerage role of providers and the creation of a universal careers service."
However, the colleges would like to see more employers paying for training and being held accountable for the nation's skills as readily as the government, he said.
The National Union of Students welcomed the government's response but said it was concerned that the demands of specific employers would have too significant a role to play, at the expense of individuals' development.