This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2012/oct/08/french-tech-entrepreneurs

The article has changed 21 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
French tech entrepreneurs revolt French tech entrepreneurs revolt
(1 day later)
Not against their VC overlords, mind you. No, calling themselves "Pigeons" ("the fleeced") they staged a highly visible protest (Google translation) against their government's latest financial measure. In a nutshell, the new Socialist administration proposed to tax an entrepreneur's capital gains as ordinary income. In very rough numbers, the tax rate would go from 19% to 60% or, some say, 80% in extreme cases.Not against their VC overlords, mind you. No, calling themselves "Pigeons" ("the fleeced") they staged a highly visible protest (Google translation) against their government's latest financial measure. In a nutshell, the new Socialist administration proposed to tax an entrepreneur's capital gains as ordinary income. In very rough numbers, the tax rate would go from 19% to 60% or, some say, 80% in extreme cases.
The outcry, obligingly amplified by the media, forced the minister of finance to meet a delegation of the aggrieved and to beat a hasty retreat with the customary weasel words of caring for entrepreneurship, competitiveness, social justice and the country's much-needed financial sanity.The outcry, obligingly amplified by the media, forced the minister of finance to meet a delegation of the aggrieved and to beat a hasty retreat with the customary weasel words of caring for entrepreneurship, competitiveness, social justice and the country's much-needed financial sanity.
This isn't the first time the French government has made moves that hurt both the condition and the perception of its economy. It is, I believe, yet another manifestation of its perverted, ambivalent relationship with money.This isn't the first time the French government has made moves that hurt both the condition and the perception of its economy. It is, I believe, yet another manifestation of its perverted, ambivalent relationship with money.
Allow me to explain.Allow me to explain.
I'm at the Café de Flore, my Parisian neighbourhood – what I call the World Centre for the Caviar Left. There, my café-crème drinking companions sometimes question my having left France to go live in the epitome of materialism, Silicon Valley. I point to the double-parked Porsches, the Louis Vuitton, Dior, Armani, Berlutti and Ralph Lauren stores nearby. The answer, uttered in utmost sincerity, never varies: "It's not the same…"I'm at the Café de Flore, my Parisian neighbourhood – what I call the World Centre for the Caviar Left. There, my café-crème drinking companions sometimes question my having left France to go live in the epitome of materialism, Silicon Valley. I point to the double-parked Porsches, the Louis Vuitton, Dior, Armani, Berlutti and Ralph Lauren stores nearby. The answer, uttered in utmost sincerity, never varies: "It's not the same…"
In a way, they're right. Regarding sex and money, American and French cultures exhibit truly polar opposite behaviour. The French see nothing wrong with a president having a wife, a mistress and a love child; they revel in sexual and often sexist jokes. But, if you ask someone how much they paid for their apartment, they'll react as if you'd touched them in boundary-breaking ways. Conversely, they perceive Americans as demonising sex – think a past president and his "oral" office – while being obscene with money.In a way, they're right. Regarding sex and money, American and French cultures exhibit truly polar opposite behaviour. The French see nothing wrong with a president having a wife, a mistress and a love child; they revel in sexual and often sexist jokes. But, if you ask someone how much they paid for their apartment, they'll react as if you'd touched them in boundary-breaking ways. Conversely, they perceive Americans as demonising sex – think a past president and his "oral" office – while being obscene with money.
If, as I believe, the most honest statement of country's values is its tax code, the French government has time and again clearly stated where it stands.If, as I believe, the most honest statement of country's values is its tax code, the French government has time and again clearly stated where it stands.
One such declaration is the ISF, the wealth tax. It's not a gains tax (on income or capital), or a transaction tax (sales tax or VAT), this is a levy on your assets after you've paid all taxes on the path to your owning said assets. I can be seen as a cultural indictment of the "haves". The ISF comes with bizarre (or revealing) exclusions: you own a business, that asset is not taxed; the same goes for your expensive art collection; 75% of the forest you own is ISF-free. (I'll stop there and warn readers the Wikipedia ISF article is woefully out of date on details, but right on the concept.)One such declaration is the ISF, the wealth tax. It's not a gains tax (on income or capital), or a transaction tax (sales tax or VAT), this is a levy on your assets after you've paid all taxes on the path to your owning said assets. I can be seen as a cultural indictment of the "haves". The ISF comes with bizarre (or revealing) exclusions: you own a business, that asset is not taxed; the same goes for your expensive art collection; 75% of the forest you own is ISF-free. (I'll stop there and warn readers the Wikipedia ISF article is woefully out of date on details, but right on the concept.)
The ISF keeps exerting a perverse influence on the country.
First, too many people with substantial assets fled the country, often to nearby Belgium and UK where they were welcomed as they were going to enrich the local economies. I personally know high-tech executives who, after paying good-size income tax bills for decades, decided to protect their savings and moved out. A loss for the French, from grocers to cab drivers and teachers.
The ISF keeps exerting a perverse influence on the country.
First, too many people with substantial assets fled the country, often to nearby Belgium and UK where they were welcomed as they were going to enrich the local economies. I personally know high-tech executives who, after paying good-size income tax bills for decades, decided to protect their savings and moved out. A loss for the French, from grocers to cab drivers and teachers.
Second, companies with European HQs in France moved out – their executives paying income tax on their wages didn't want to pay additional levies on their assets. Apple is but one such example. Its European HQ is now in London. And, of course, no other company will now expose its execs to the ISF by locating its headquarters in France. Another loss in money and, just as important, in reputation, in making France look business-hostile.Second, companies with European HQs in France moved out – their executives paying income tax on their wages didn't want to pay additional levies on their assets. Apple is but one such example. Its European HQ is now in London. And, of course, no other company will now expose its execs to the ISF by locating its headquarters in France. Another loss in money and, just as important, in reputation, in making France look business-hostile.
Last May, France elected a new president, François Hollande, a leader of the Socialist party who successfully presented himself as an alternative to the somewhat conservative and definitely abrasive Nicolas Sarkozy. On the stump, Hollande promised more fiscal justice and went for a new low in demagoguery, saying: "I hate rich people."Last May, France elected a new president, François Hollande, a leader of the Socialist party who successfully presented himself as an alternative to the somewhat conservative and definitely abrasive Nicolas Sarkozy. On the stump, Hollande promised more fiscal justice and went for a new low in demagoguery, saying: "I hate rich people."
Once he got in office, needing more revenue in a sinking economy, he announced he'd raise the ISF percentage, and tax incomes above €1m at a new 75% rate. Plus the new tax rate for capital gains discussed at the beginning.Once he got in office, needing more revenue in a sinking economy, he announced he'd raise the ISF percentage, and tax incomes above €1m at a new 75% rate. Plus the new tax rate for capital gains discussed at the beginning.
Interestingly, besides the Pigeons' protest (an example here, so-so translation by Google here), high functionaries in the ministry of finance have attacked their administration's latest moves.Interestingly, besides the Pigeons' protest (an example here, so-so translation by Google here), high functionaries in the ministry of finance have attacked their administration's latest moves.
In Le Monde (the semi-official daily) these well-informed technocrats published a damning opinion piece (translation here) under a nom de plume, Les Arvernes.In Le Monde (the semi-official daily) these well-informed technocrats published a damning opinion piece (translation here) under a nom de plume, Les Arvernes.
In it, they reminded us that, with the rarest of exceptions, their government bosses have never had real jobs. These apparatchiks have no intellectual and, most important, no emotional connection to what building a business is, to putting money and reputation at risk. When you get a wage, you don't put money at risk. When you build a company, you do. Taxing two different risks at the same rate shows dangerous ignorance of what building a business is – and of the consequences of making France less attractive to business builders.In it, they reminded us that, with the rarest of exceptions, their government bosses have never had real jobs. These apparatchiks have no intellectual and, most important, no emotional connection to what building a business is, to putting money and reputation at risk. When you get a wage, you don't put money at risk. When you build a company, you do. Taxing two different risks at the same rate shows dangerous ignorance of what building a business is – and of the consequences of making France less attractive to business builders.
Here in Silicon Valley, once we're done slapping our foreheads, we look forward to seeing more talent flow in, looking for a friendlier ecosystem. Paradoxically perhaps, entrepreneurs moving to the Valley shouldn't worry the money pump operators back in France. As the Israel and India examples clearly establish, emigrating entrepreneurs end up doing a lot of good for their country. They send back money, jobs, savoir-faire, technology, culture and optimism. To them, Silicon Valley is a new Villa Medici. This is much better than the Maginot Line French politicians sometime fantasise about in order to prevent individuals moving to better business climates.Here in Silicon Valley, once we're done slapping our foreheads, we look forward to seeing more talent flow in, looking for a friendlier ecosystem. Paradoxically perhaps, entrepreneurs moving to the Valley shouldn't worry the money pump operators back in France. As the Israel and India examples clearly establish, emigrating entrepreneurs end up doing a lot of good for their country. They send back money, jobs, savoir-faire, technology, culture and optimism. To them, Silicon Valley is a new Villa Medici. This is much better than the Maginot Line French politicians sometime fantasise about in order to prevent individuals moving to better business climates.
JLG@mondaynote.comJLG@mondaynote.com
Comments
4 comments, displaying first
8 October 2012 11:27AM
So you ran away to the 'land of the free' for a little unbridled capitalism and now you want to give lessons to a country you no longer live or pay tax in? Right ..... Bet if you ever fall sick you'll be back here for some decent state-funded health care though.
Link to this comment:
8 October 2012 11:55AM
There, my cafe-creme drinking companions sometimes question my having left France to go live in the epitome of materialism, Silicon Valley. I point to the double-parked Porsches, the Louis Vuitton, Dior, Armani, Berlutti and Ralph Lauren stores nearby. The answer, uttered in utmost sincerity, never varies: "It's not the same…"

This is hilarious, and just about sums up what a lot of us think about when we think about French stereotypes.
Link to this comment:
8 October 2012 5:12PM
.. or Chelsea stereotypes, or Essex or Premiership footballers or ...
Link to this comment:
11 October 2012 1:28AM
@steena, a little "unbridled" capitalism? This could only come from a unbridled statist where onerous government regulation and punitive taxation on production and property is the epitome of laissez-faire. I bet if he doesn't want to wait in lines, be denied a bed and or treatment by medical bureaucrats and actually wants quality health care, he won't be back there.
Link to this comment:
Comments on this page are now closed.
More from Monday Note
Media and tech analysis by Frédéric Filloux and Jean-Louis Gassée. Read more on the Monday Note blog
15 Oct 2012: Hewlett-Packard keeps losing the plot
8 Oct 2012: Tablets could provide a tonic for serious news
Monday Note index
Seedcamp Week 2010: an education in enterprise
15 Sep 2010
Investor: 'When the water level goes down you will see who is swimming naked – so only true entrepreneurs and true investors are left'
26 Sep 2011
Dragons' fen: the next generation of hi-tech startups from Cambridge
12 Nov 2009
Ebook entrepreneur Neil Jones takes on the big guys
6 Oct 2011
Tech Weekly Live: Tech City Talk - If You Build It, Will They Come?
2 Jun 2009
Our list: 'Fresh faces in tech: Ten kid entrepreneurs to watch'
'Les Pigeons' shooed off a key François Hollande policy with worrying ease
5 Oct 2012
Agnès Poirier: The French government has revealed a soft underbelly in yielding to a group of angry French web entrepreneurs
Turn autoplay off
Turn autoplay on
Please activate cookies in order to turn autoplay off
Edition: UK
About us
Today's paper
Subscribe
Higher French taxes on incomes and capital gains can only help fuel the exodus of talented executives to Silicon Valley
Not against their VC overlords, mind you. No, calling themselves "Pigeons" ("the fleeced") they staged a highly visible protest (Google translation) against their government's latest financial measure. In a nutshell, the new Socialist administration proposed to tax an entrepreneur's capital gains as ordinary income. In very rough numbers, the tax rate would go from 19% to 60% or, some say, 80% in extreme cases.
The outcry, obligingly amplified by the media, forced the minister of finance to meet a delegation of the aggrieved and to beat a hasty retreat with the customary weasel words of caring for entrepreneurship, competitiveness, social justice and the country's much-needed financial sanity.
This isn't the first time the French government has made moves that hurt both the condition and the perception of its economy. It is, I believe, yet another manifestation of its perverted, ambivalent relationship with money.
Allow me to explain.
I'm at the Café de Flore, my Parisian neighbourhood – what I call the World Centre for the Caviar Left. There, my café-crème drinking companions sometimes question my having left France to go live in the epitome of materialism, Silicon Valley. I point to the double-parked Porsches, the Louis Vuitton, Dior, Armani, Berlutti and Ralph Lauren stores nearby. The answer, uttered in utmost sincerity, never varies: "It's not the same…"
In a way, they're right. Regarding sex and money, American and French cultures exhibit truly polar opposite behaviour. The French see nothing wrong with a president having a wife, a mistress and a love child; they revel in sexual and often sexist jokes. But, if you ask someone how much they paid for their apartment, they'll react as if you'd touched them in boundary-breaking ways. Conversely, they perceive Americans as demonising sex – think a past president and his "oral" office – while being obscene with money.
If, as I believe, the most honest statement of country's values is its tax code, the French government has time and again clearly stated where it stands.
One such declaration is the ISF, the wealth tax. It's not a gains tax (on income or capital), or a transaction tax (sales tax or VAT), this is a levy on your assets after you've paid all taxes on the path to your owning said assets. I can be seen as a cultural indictment of the "haves". The ISF comes with bizarre (or revealing) exclusions: you own a business, that asset is not taxed; the same goes for your expensive art collection; 75% of the forest you own is ISF-free. (I'll stop there and warn readers the Wikipedia ISF article is woefully out of date on details, but right on the concept.)
The ISF keeps exerting a perverse influence on the country.
First, too many people with substantial assets fled the country, often to nearby Belgium and UK where they were welcomed as they were going to enrich the local economies. I personally know high-tech executives who, after paying good-size income tax bills for decades, decided to protect their savings and moved out. A loss for the French, from grocers to cab drivers and teachers.
Second, companies with European HQs in France moved out – their executives paying income tax on their wages didn't want to pay additional levies on their assets. Apple is but one such example. Its European HQ is now in London. And, of course, no other company will now expose its execs to the ISF by locating its headquarters in France. Another loss in money and, just as important, in reputation, in making France look business-hostile.
Last May, France elected a new president, François Hollande, a leader of the Socialist party who successfully presented himself as an alternative to the somewhat conservative and definitely abrasive Nicolas Sarkozy. On the stump, Hollande promised more fiscal justice and went for a new low in demagoguery, saying: "I hate rich people."
Once he got in office, needing more revenue in a sinking economy, he announced he'd raise the ISF percentage, and tax incomes above €1m at a new 75% rate. Plus the new tax rate for capital gains discussed at the beginning.
Interestingly, besides the Pigeons' protest (an example here, so-so translation by Google here), high functionaries in the ministry of finance have attacked their administration's latest moves.
In Le Monde (the semi-official daily) these well-informed technocrats published a damning opinion piece (translation here) under a nom de plume, Les Arvernes.
In it, they reminded us that, with the rarest of exceptions, their government bosses have never had real jobs. These apparatchiks have no intellectual and, most important, no emotional connection to what building a business is, to putting money and reputation at risk. When you get a wage, you don't put money at risk. When you build a company, you do. Taxing two different risks at the same rate shows dangerous ignorance of what building a business is – and of the consequences of making France less attractive to business builders.
Here in Silicon Valley, once we're done slapping our foreheads, we look forward to seeing more talent flow in, looking for a friendlier ecosystem. Paradoxically perhaps, entrepreneurs moving to the Valley shouldn't worry the money pump operators back in France. As the Israel and India examples clearly establish, emigrating entrepreneurs end up doing a lot of good for their country. They send back money, jobs, savoir-faire, technology, culture and optimism. To them, Silicon Valley is a new Villa Medici. This is much better than the Maginot Line French politicians sometime fantasise about in order to prevent individuals moving to better business climates.
JLG@mondaynote.com