This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/oct/19/relatives-soldiers-iraq-damages-claims
The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Relatives of UK soldiers killed in Iraq win right to pursue damages claims | Relatives of UK soldiers killed in Iraq win right to pursue damages claims |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| Relatives of soldiers killed in Iraq have secured a victory in the latest round of a compensation fight with ministers. | Relatives of soldiers killed in Iraq have secured a victory in the latest round of a compensation fight with ministers. |
| The court of appeal said families could pursue damages claims against the government. Three appeal judges announced the decision after a hearing in London. | The court of appeal said families could pursue damages claims against the government. Three appeal judges announced the decision after a hearing in London. |
| Relatives say the Ministry of Defence failed to provide armoured vehicles or equipment which could have saved lives, and thus should pay compensation. MoD bosses say decisions about battlefield equipment are for politicians and military commanders. | |
| The judges ruled that relatives could pursue claims on grounds of negligence. A lawyer representing the families described the ruling as "an important victory". | The judges ruled that relatives could pursue claims on grounds of negligence. A lawyer representing the families described the ruling as "an important victory". |
| The court of appeal announcement followed a ruling in June 2011 by a high court judge who said relatives could pursue claims on negligence grounds, but not under human rights legislation. | |
| The MoD appealed against Mr Justice Owen's ruling on negligence claims, while the relatives challenged his findings on the human rights issue. | |
| Friday's ruling follows a hearing in June before the then master of the rolls, Lord Neuberger, Lord Justice Moses and Lord Justice Rimer. | Friday's ruling follows a hearing in June before the then master of the rolls, Lord Neuberger, Lord Justice Moses and Lord Justice Rimer. |
| Legal action was started as a result of the deaths of a number of British soldiers following the American-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, judges heard. | Legal action was started as a result of the deaths of a number of British soldiers following the American-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, judges heard. |
| Corporal Stephen Allbutt, 35, of Sneyd Green, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, was killed in a "friendly fire" incident in March 2003. He died after a Challenger 2 tank was hit by another Challenger 2 tank. | Corporal Stephen Allbutt, 35, of Sneyd Green, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, was killed in a "friendly fire" incident in March 2003. He died after a Challenger 2 tank was hit by another Challenger 2 tank. |
| Soldiers Dan Twiddy, of Stamford, Lincolnshire, and Andy Julien, of Bolton, Greater Manchester, were badly hurt in the incident. | Soldiers Dan Twiddy, of Stamford, Lincolnshire, and Andy Julien, of Bolton, Greater Manchester, were badly hurt in the incident. |
| Private Phillip Hewett, 21, of Tamworth, Staffordshire, died in July 2005 after a Snatch Land Rover was blown up. | Private Phillip Hewett, 21, of Tamworth, Staffordshire, died in July 2005 after a Snatch Land Rover was blown up. |
| Similar explosions claimed the lives of Private Lee Ellis, 23, of Wythenshawe, Greater Manchester, in February 2006, and Lance Corporal Kirk Redpath, 22, of Romford, Essex, in August 2007. | Similar explosions claimed the lives of Private Lee Ellis, 23, of Wythenshawe, Greater Manchester, in February 2006, and Lance Corporal Kirk Redpath, 22, of Romford, Essex, in August 2007. |
| Shubhaa Srinivasan, a partner with the law firm Leigh Day & Co, which is representing the family of Allbutt and the surviving servicemen, said: "We maintain that the MoD's position has been morally and legally indefensible, as they owe a duty of care to those who fight on behalf of this country. | Shubhaa Srinivasan, a partner with the law firm Leigh Day & Co, which is representing the family of Allbutt and the surviving servicemen, said: "We maintain that the MoD's position has been morally and legally indefensible, as they owe a duty of care to those who fight on behalf of this country. |
| "British troops should at the very least have adequate equipment and training, ranging from the very basic such as a GPS devices to sophisticated satellite tracker systems, which the Americans had available to them. | "British troops should at the very least have adequate equipment and training, ranging from the very basic such as a GPS devices to sophisticated satellite tracker systems, which the Americans had available to them. |
| "It seems incredible that it was often left up to soldiers themselves to buy this equipment as they felt compelled to, so as to better protect their own lives and the lives of those they were responsible for." | "It seems incredible that it was often left up to soldiers themselves to buy this equipment as they felt compelled to, so as to better protect their own lives and the lives of those they were responsible for." |