This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/oct/23/indiana-planned-parenthood-funding-federal-court
The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 5 | Version 6 |
|---|---|
| Indiana's Planned Parenthood funding cut blocked by federal appeals court | Indiana's Planned Parenthood funding cut blocked by federal appeals court |
| (4 months later) | |
| Indiana stepped between women and their physicians when it enacted a law that blocked Medicaid funds for Planned Parenthood, just because the organization provides abortions, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday. | Indiana stepped between women and their physicians when it enacted a law that blocked Medicaid funds for Planned Parenthood, just because the organization provides abortions, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday. |
| The ruling by the seventh US circuit court of appeals in Chicago effectively upheld decisions by a district judge and a Medicaid review panel that found the 2011 law denied patients the right to choose their own healthcare provider. | The ruling by the seventh US circuit court of appeals in Chicago effectively upheld decisions by a district judge and a Medicaid review panel that found the 2011 law denied patients the right to choose their own healthcare provider. |
| At a news conference in Indianapolis Ken Falk, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, said: "This is not about an abortion case. This is a case about Medicaid services – non-abortion-related services – and the attempt by the state of Indiana to punish Planned Parenthood and its clients from receiving non-abortion health services merely because Planned Parenthood, without any sort of state or federal money or any Medicaid funds, also provides abortions." | At a news conference in Indianapolis Ken Falk, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, said: "This is not about an abortion case. This is a case about Medicaid services – non-abortion-related services – and the attempt by the state of Indiana to punish Planned Parenthood and its clients from receiving non-abortion health services merely because Planned Parenthood, without any sort of state or federal money or any Medicaid funds, also provides abortions." |
| The ACLU argued the case on behalf of Planned Parenthood. | The ACLU argued the case on behalf of Planned Parenthood. |
| The ruling will likely have little impact on Planned Parenthood's operations in Indiana, as funding to its clinics has been largely uninterrupted since Republican governor Mitch Daniels signed a law attempting to cut the organization off in May 2011. Daniels' spokeswoman did not respond to phone requests for comment Tuesday. | The ruling will likely have little impact on Planned Parenthood's operations in Indiana, as funding to its clinics has been largely uninterrupted since Republican governor Mitch Daniels signed a law attempting to cut the organization off in May 2011. Daniels' spokeswoman did not respond to phone requests for comment Tuesday. |
| The 2011 law made Indiana the first state to deny Planned Parenthood the Medicaid funds for general health services including cancer screenings. The family-planning organization immediately challenged the law, with help from the ACLU. In June 2011, district judge Tanya Walton Pratt blocked the state from enforcing the law. The state appealed that order, arguing that federal law says Medicaid cannot be used to cover abortions in most circumstances and that the program indirectly funds the procedures by providing money to Planned Parenthood. | The 2011 law made Indiana the first state to deny Planned Parenthood the Medicaid funds for general health services including cancer screenings. The family-planning organization immediately challenged the law, with help from the ACLU. In June 2011, district judge Tanya Walton Pratt blocked the state from enforcing the law. The state appealed that order, arguing that federal law says Medicaid cannot be used to cover abortions in most circumstances and that the program indirectly funds the procedures by providing money to Planned Parenthood. |
| On Tuesday, the seventh US circuit court of appeals in Chicago upheld the core portion of Pratt's order, saying the Indiana law effectively stamps on a person's right to choose their doctors. | On Tuesday, the seventh US circuit court of appeals in Chicago upheld the core portion of Pratt's order, saying the Indiana law effectively stamps on a person's right to choose their doctors. |
| "The defunding law excludes Planned Parenthood from Medicaid for a reason unrelated to its fitness to provide medical services, violating its patients' statutory right to obtain medical care from the qualified provider of their choice," the ruling said. | "The defunding law excludes Planned Parenthood from Medicaid for a reason unrelated to its fitness to provide medical services, violating its patients' statutory right to obtain medical care from the qualified provider of their choice," the ruling said. |
| Bryan Corbin, a spokesman for the Indiana attorney general's office, said the state was reviewing the appeals court opinion. The state can either ask the full court to review the panel's ruling or appeal directly to the Supreme Court. | Bryan Corbin, a spokesman for the Indiana attorney general's office, said the state was reviewing the appeals court opinion. The state can either ask the full court to review the panel's ruling or appeal directly to the Supreme Court. |
| The Indiana law affected about $1m in Medicaid funds out of Planned Parenthood's state budget of $15m, said Betty Cockrum, the group's state president. The appeals court said Pratt also needed to modify other sections of her order that affected about $150,000 in revenue sources other than Medicaid. Cockrum and Falk said that federal grant for sexually transmitted disease testing in 22 counties was set to expire at the end of this year. | The Indiana law affected about $1m in Medicaid funds out of Planned Parenthood's state budget of $15m, said Betty Cockrum, the group's state president. The appeals court said Pratt also needed to modify other sections of her order that affected about $150,000 in revenue sources other than Medicaid. Cockrum and Falk said that federal grant for sexually transmitted disease testing in 22 counties was set to expire at the end of this year. |
| Tuesday's ruling sends the case back to Pratt's court, where she will decide whether to make the injunction blocking the law permanent. Indiana is also awaiting a final decision on a bureaucratic appeal by the agency that regulates Medicaid. A federal panel previously found the law violated Medicaid regulations. | Tuesday's ruling sends the case back to Pratt's court, where she will decide whether to make the injunction blocking the law permanent. Indiana is also awaiting a final decision on a bureaucratic appeal by the agency that regulates Medicaid. A federal panel previously found the law violated Medicaid regulations. |
| A federal judge in Phoenix last week blocked Arizona from applying a similar law to Planned Parenthood. A similar law in Texas also is the focus of a court fight. | A federal judge in Phoenix last week blocked Arizona from applying a similar law to Planned Parenthood. A similar law in Texas also is the focus of a court fight. |
| Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. |