This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/25/us/politics/guantanamo-detainee-al-nashiri-protests-use-of-chains-for-court.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Guantánamo Detainee Protests Use of Chains as a Condition of Coming to Court Guantánamo Detainee Threatens to Boycott Trial Over ‘Aggressive’ Treatment
(about 5 hours later)
FORT MEADE, Md. — A Saudi man accused of helping to plot Al Qaeda’s attack on the U.S.S. Cole in 2000 told a military commission judge at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba on Wednesday that he would boycott his case if military guards force him to wear chains as a condition of coming to court. FORT MEADE, Md. — A Saudi man accused of helping to plot Al Qaeda’s attack on the destroyer Cole in 2000 told a military commission judge at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, on Wednesday that he would boycott his case if military guards force him to wear chains as a condition of coming to court.
The defendant, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, stood behind a desk and delivered a monologue several minutes long about what he portrayed as bad treatment and unnecessarily “aggressive” security measures by prison guards. An uncomfortable car used to transport him to the court made him vomit, he said, and belly chains hurt his “bad back.” The defendant, Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, stood behind a desk and delivered a monologue several minutes long about what he portrayed as bad treatment and unnecessarily “aggressive” security measures by prison guards. A car that takes him to court is uncomfortable and makes him vomit, he said, and belly chains hurt his “bad back.”
“I intend to attend all future session,” Mr. Nashiri said. “But if the guards do not treat me better, I have the right not to come. And let the world know that the judge sentenced me to death because I didn’t show up to court due to chains.”“I intend to attend all future session,” Mr. Nashiri said. “But if the guards do not treat me better, I have the right not to come. And let the world know that the judge sentenced me to death because I didn’t show up to court due to chains.”
Mr. Nashiri had decided to stay in his cell on Tuesday, during the first day of a pretrial motions hearing that was held at Guantánamo and shown to reporters here in suburban Maryland. He was compelled to attend on Wednesday by the judge, Col. James Pohl of the Army, for the purpose of being informed in person that he had the right not to attend such sessions but that doing so could damage his defense. Mr. Nashiri stayed in his cell on Tuesday during the first day of a pretrial motions hearing that was held at Guantánamo and shown to reporters here in suburban Maryland. He was compelled to attend on Wednesday by the judge, Col. James Pohl of the Army, for the purpose of being informed in person that he had the right not to attend such sessions, but that doing so could damage his defense.
Prosecutors have sought to compel Mr. Nashiri’s attendance, lest his absence from the trial raise a question about its fairness that could become the basis for an appeal after any conviction. Mr. Nashiri’s lawyers have argued that their client was tortured by the Central Intelligence Agency in ways that make the security steps associated with involuntarily attendance — like forced cell extractions — damaging to their client’s mental and physical health, and have asked for a medical evaluation.Prosecutors have sought to compel Mr. Nashiri’s attendance, lest his absence from the trial raise a question about its fairness that could become the basis for an appeal after any conviction. Mr. Nashiri’s lawyers have argued that their client was tortured by the Central Intelligence Agency in ways that make the security steps associated with involuntarily attendance — like forced cell extractions — damaging to their client’s mental and physical health, and have asked for a medical evaluation.
The Cole bombing, off the shore of Aden, Yemen, in 2000, killed 17 American soldiers. Mr. Nashiri is one of several accused planners of the attack on the American destroyer. He was captured in 2002 and held in secret overseas C.I.A. “black site” prisons until 2006, when he was transferred to military custody at Guantánamo Bay. The Cole bombing, in the waters near Aden, Yemen, in 2000, killed 17 Americans. Mr. Nashiri is one of several people accused of planning the attack. He was captured in 2002 and held in secret overseas C.I.A. “black site” prisons until 2006, when he was transferred to military custody at Guantánamo Bay.
The hearing on Wednesday played out against the approaching threat from Tropical Storm Sandy, which was upgraded to a Category 1 hurricane as the morning unfolded. It was forecast to hit southeast Cuba by Thursday morning. Colonel Pohl ordered the hearing to proceed, seeking to get through as many issues as possible before the storm intervened. The hearing on Wednesday played out against the approaching threat from Hurricane Sandy. It was forecast to hit southeast Cuba by Thursday morning. Colonel Pohl ordered the hearing to proceed, seeking to get through as many issues as possible before the storm intervened.
Among the other issues handled on Wednesday, the lawyers sparred over a protective order for classified information, echoing a debate last week in a pretrial motion for the Sept. 11 case over whether defendants’ memories of C.I.A. interrogations can be censored from the media and the public as classified. Richard Kammen, a civilian lawyer for Mr. Nashiri, urged the judge to throw out the charges. He argued that the United States was not at war in Yemen at the time of the bombing and did not go to war in response to it, so it was a peacetime crime that could be prosecuted in a civilian court, but not before a military commission.
Defense lawyers also complained that they had not been given all the statements taken by Yemeni investigators of Yemeni witnesses to the Cole attack who were later re-interrogated by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Prosecutors said they had turned over all the Yemeni statements in the F.B.I. case file. But Anthony Mattivi, one of the prosecutors, argued that Congress and the executive branch had agreed that it was appropriate for tribunals to handle offenses like the Cole bombing as long as the military jury decides that the act took place “within the context of hostilities,” even if the United States was not yet at war.
Defense lawyers also sought more intelligence about Abu Ali al-Harithi, a Yemeni man who was killed by a drone strike in 2002 and who has also been described as a planner of the Cole attack. Prosecutors said they were in the process of turning over all the Cole-related intelligence the government had about Mr. Harithi, but Richard Kammen, a civilian lawyer for Mr. Nashiri, said other government agencies might not be trusted to turn over everything to the prosecutors. The clean-shaven Mr. Nashiri wore a gray suit jacket over white clothing. He had short hair, wore no turban and put on his earphones to listen to a simultaneous translation.
The clean-shaven Mr. Nashiri wore a gray suit jacket over white clothing. He had short hair, wore no turban, and put on his earphones to listen to a simultaneous translation. His appearance was in striking contrast to that of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and four other defendants facing charges over the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. At their motions hearing last week, the five men generally refused to wear their earphones, so the military installed a speaker nearby to provide a low-volume translation. Mr. Mohammed wore a turban and a camouflage hunting jacket, and had long hair and a bushy beard dyed in a reddish hennalike color, in accordance with a custom in the Middle East.
Mr. Nashiri wore a gray suit jacket over white clothing, was clean-shaven with short hair, wore no turban and put on his earphones to listen to a simultaneous translation. His appearance was in striking contrast to Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and four other defendants facing charges over the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. At their motions hearing last week, those five generally refused to wear their earphones, so the military installed speaker near them to play a low-volume translation. Mr. Mohammed wore a turban and a camouflage hunting jacket, and had long hair and a bushy beard dyed in a reddish henna-like color, in accordance with a custom in the Middle East.
It had been a mystery where Mr. Mohammed was getting the dye for his beard since he first appeared that way at his arraignment in the spring. As first reported this week by The Miami Herald, a Pentagon spokesman, Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale, said Mr. Mohammed was using berries and fruit juices from his meals to stain his beard.It had been a mystery where Mr. Mohammed was getting the dye for his beard since he first appeared that way at his arraignment in the spring. As first reported this week by The Miami Herald, a Pentagon spokesman, Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale, said Mr. Mohammed was using berries and fruit juices from his meals to stain his beard.
Mr. Mohammed “was allowed to concoct a harmless, nontoxic berry-based ‘dye’ to use on his beard,” Lt. Colonel Breasseale confirmed in an e-mail. “We view this allowance as a reasonable consideration that comports with both health and cultural norms.”