This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20092199

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Penguin merger talks with Random House lift Pearson shares Penguin and Random House: Mergers 'inevitable for some time'
(about 1 hour later)
Shares in Pearson rose 1.5% on Friday following the announcement that it was in talks about merging its Penguin publishing house with rival Random House. By Anthony Reuben Business reporter, BBC News
Pearson confirmed the talks after the markets closed on Thursday. Big mergers in publishing have been "inevitable for some time since Amazon got so big", the editor of The Bookseller magazine says.
They are seen as part of its plans to focus the business on education. Philip Jones was responding to news that Pearson group was in talks about a merger between its Penguin unit and rival publisher Random House.
Random House, which is owned by Germany's Bertelsmann, has recently become the biggest publisher in the UK, with Penguin at number three. The former head of Borders UK, Philip Downer, said they needed to merge to stand up to Amazon or Apple.
Random House has had a successful year, helped by the Fifty Shades series. Random House is the UK's biggest publisher. Penguin is number three.
Among Penguin's best-sellers for the year have been Jamie Oliver's cookbooks.
Pearson warned there was no certainty that the talks would be successful.
"It's a recognition that they don't individually have the scale to be able to stand up to companies like Amazon or Apple," Philip Downer, former chief executive of Borders UK who now runs the retail consultancy Front of Store, told the BBC."It's a recognition that they don't individually have the scale to be able to stand up to companies like Amazon or Apple," Philip Downer, former chief executive of Borders UK who now runs the retail consultancy Front of Store, told the BBC.
He also said that the big trade publishers were looking a bit out of place in the media conglomerates that own them. Book industry commentator Alistair Burtenshaw agreed that, "negotiating power is becoming ever more important".
"What were, 10 or 20 years ago, prestige holdings now look more challenged in a multimedia world," Mr Downer added. "The media landscape has changed a great deal with the arrival of Apple, Amazon and Google. Publishers need to be able to leverage their content across the widest range of platforms," he said.
The Financial Times, which is also owned by Pearson, quoted sources saying that if the talks were successful, Bertelsmann would end up with more than 50% of the combined publisher. He added that while there was concern from some of the agents who represent authors that there would be fewer places to go to sell their books, the tie-up would actually be important for authors.
"Pearson confirms that it is discussing with Bertelsmann a possible combination of Penguin and Random House," a company statement said. "Publishers will be able to represent authors with greater strength - it is important to be able to go into discussions with a strong proposition," he said.
"The two companies have not reached agreement and there is no certainty that the discussions will lead to a transaction. A further announcement will be made if and when appropriate." The merger of Penguin with Random House is seen as a key part of Pearson's plans to concentrate on its educational businesses.
Pearson chief executive Marjorie Scardino is stepping down at the end of this year and will be replaced by John Fallon, currently head of Pearson's International Education division.Pearson chief executive Marjorie Scardino is stepping down at the end of this year and will be replaced by John Fallon, currently head of Pearson's International Education division.
The group sees this part of the business as crucial to its future growth strategy. There has been much speculation that he could decide to spin-off or sell Penguin or the Financial Times.
Mr Downer said that the big trade publishers were looking a bit out of place in the media conglomerates that own them.
"What were, 10 or 20 years ago, prestige holdings now look more challenged in a multimedia world," he said.
A merger between Penguin and Random House would be the biggest tie-up in the industry since the Lagardere bought Time Warner books to create Hachette in 2006.A merger between Penguin and Random House would be the biggest tie-up in the industry since the Lagardere bought Time Warner books to create Hachette in 2006.
It would bring together the publishers of the Fifty Shades series and Jamie Oliver's cookbooks.
"The two companies have not reached agreement and there is no certainty that the discussions will lead to a transaction," Pearson warned in a statement to the London Stock Exchange.
Even if they do reach an agreement, competition regulators may object to the tie-up, which would give the combined group more than a quarter of the UK and US markets.
"They should be able to negotiate their way into this merger by selling peripheral parts of their businesses and keeping themselves below a 25% market share," said Philip Jones from The Bookseller.
"If they are prepared to allow Amazon to have 90% of the e-book market in the UK and 80% in the US, they can't really block a merger that is responding to it."
The Financial Times, which is also owned by Pearson, quoted sources saying that if the talks were successful, Bertelsmann would end up with more than 50% of the combined publisher.
"On the down side it would leave much less competition among publishers for authors," said Liz Thomson from the book industry website Bookbrunch."On the down side it would leave much less competition among publishers for authors," said Liz Thomson from the book industry website Bookbrunch.
"On the plus side Random House is quite a creative publisher - they do allow their imprints to flourish," she told BBC News."On the plus side Random House is quite a creative publisher - they do allow their imprints to flourish," she told BBC News.
"So there's a mixture of things, but I think one would say overall it is not a good thing for the industry.""So there's a mixture of things, but I think one would say overall it is not a good thing for the industry."