This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/nov/04/duncan-wingham-british-antarctic-survey

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Research boss Wingham in trouble over British Antarctic Survey claim Research boss Wingham in trouble over British Antarctic Survey claim
(5 months later)
The research council chief who controversially tried to close down the British Antarctic Survey has been ordered to explain apparently inaccurate remarks to the Commons science select committee last week. MPs are concerned about the account given by Duncan Wingham, head of the Natural Environment Research Council, of personnel changes made at the BAS after preparations to close it were instigated this year.The research council chief who controversially tried to close down the British Antarctic Survey has been ordered to explain apparently inaccurate remarks to the Commons science select committee last week. MPs are concerned about the account given by Duncan Wingham, head of the Natural Environment Research Council, of personnel changes made at the BAS after preparations to close it were instigated this year.
The closure plan – first revealed by the Observer – generated widespread hostility and was eventually abandoned last week. Wingham had tried to justify his council's plan to merge the survey with the National Oceanographic Centre in Southampton before MPs on Wednesday but was attacked for failing to justify the move on cost or scientific grounds; for failing to consult properly, and not taking into account the survey's geopolitical role in the South Atlantic. The next day, the NERC dropped the merger plan.The closure plan – first revealed by the Observer – generated widespread hostility and was eventually abandoned last week. Wingham had tried to justify his council's plan to merge the survey with the National Oceanographic Centre in Southampton before MPs on Wednesday but was attacked for failing to justify the move on cost or scientific grounds; for failing to consult properly, and not taking into account the survey's geopolitical role in the South Atlantic. The next day, the NERC dropped the merger plan.
The 60-year-old British Antarctic Survey, which has its HQ in Cambridge, operates five research stations, two ships and five aircraft in Antarctica. Breakthroughs made by its scientists have included the 1985 discovery of the hole in the ozone layer. However, its paymasters at NERC – which funds UK research on a wide range of environmental subjects – were told last year by the government to cut expenditure by 10% and capital spending by 45% by 2015. Polar research, which is costly, was chosen to take a major hit. The plan was greeted with outrage by scientists. Jonathan Shanklin, one of the researchers who discovered the ozone hole in 1985, said: "The BAS is almost synonymous with the ozone hole. Losing it would create a comparable hole in British science."The 60-year-old British Antarctic Survey, which has its HQ in Cambridge, operates five research stations, two ships and five aircraft in Antarctica. Breakthroughs made by its scientists have included the 1985 discovery of the hole in the ozone layer. However, its paymasters at NERC – which funds UK research on a wide range of environmental subjects – were told last year by the government to cut expenditure by 10% and capital spending by 45% by 2015. Polar research, which is costly, was chosen to take a major hit. The plan was greeted with outrage by scientists. Jonathan Shanklin, one of the researchers who discovered the ozone hole in 1985, said: "The BAS is almost synonymous with the ozone hole. Losing it would create a comparable hole in British science."
In the wake of this opposition, the select committee called senior NERC officials, including Wingham, to appear before it. The committee also noted that Wingham had claimed the current interim head of the survey, Professor Ed Hill, was not appointed until the previous director, his deputy and the head of corporate services had left. In fact, Hill was appointed before then. Andrew Miller, chair of the select committee, has demanded Wingham explain this inconsistency. "The committee would like to better understand the events by which Professor Hill was appointed, particularly why he was a better choice than the deputy director," states Miller in a letter sent to Wingham on Friday.In the wake of this opposition, the select committee called senior NERC officials, including Wingham, to appear before it. The committee also noted that Wingham had claimed the current interim head of the survey, Professor Ed Hill, was not appointed until the previous director, his deputy and the head of corporate services had left. In fact, Hill was appointed before then. Andrew Miller, chair of the select committee, has demanded Wingham explain this inconsistency. "The committee would like to better understand the events by which Professor Hill was appointed, particularly why he was a better choice than the deputy director," states Miller in a letter sent to Wingham on Friday.
guardian.co.uk today is our daily snapshot of the top news stories, sent to your inbox at 8am