This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/wales/north_east/6922427.stm
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Man fined in Hunting Act 'first' | Man fined in Hunting Act 'first' |
(30 minutes later) | |
A 69-year-old has been fined £200 after what is believed to be the first case in Wales under the Hunting Act 2004. | |
William Francis Armstrong from near St Asaph, Denbighshire, admitted hunting a wild animal with a dog after he was seen putting a terrier into a hole. | |
The terrier man, who was not at the hearing at Prestatyn Magistrates' Court, was ordered to pay £60 costs. | |
Another case against a man for permitting land to be used for hunting was dropped by the prosecution. | Another case against a man for permitting land to be used for hunting was dropped by the prosecution. |
The charge was brought against Armstrong after he was spotted by an off-duty police officer on the Clwydian Hills above Llangwyfan, Denbighshire on 2 January. | |
Fox hole | |
Gareth Preston, prosecuting, said the sergeant had been out walking and noticed sheep running ahead of the Flint and Denbigh Hunt. | |
From a distance, he watched the hunt close in on a fox hole and saw Armstrong, the terrier man, bring a terrier dog to the hole and send it down the hole. | |
Armstrong was then seen using a spade to dig down after the dog towards the fox, the court heard. | |
When later questioned by police, Armstrong had said he was a terrier man for the Flint and Denbigh hunt and admitted he had sent a dog in. | |
He had also described how when the fox did come out of the hole, he shot it with a pistol. | |
Whatever political or moral views people have on fox hunting, the one aspect universally supported is that the fox need not suffer more trauma than necessary Gwyn Jones, defending | |
The 2004 act allows a fox to be humanely destroyed under specific circumstances but Armstrong had not carried out certain checks it requires. | |
He had not ensured there was another hole from which the fox could be flushed out. This is to avoid the dog cornering the fox underground. | |
Armstrong also failed to give the fox a chance to escape before he shot it and should have used a shotgun instead of the .22 pistol. | |
Gwyn Jones, defending, said Armstrong had been involved with terriers since he was 12 and had not intended to cause the fox any distress. | |
He added: "Whatever political or moral views people have on fox hunting, the one aspect universally supported is that the fox need not suffer more trauma than necessary." | |
District Judge Andrew Shaw, however, reminded the court that fox hunting with dogs is illegal. | |
The court also heard that the clerk could only find details of two other prosecutions in Britain brought under the ban in Scotland and Chester. | |
Both had been more serious cases, as a terrier had been used to kill the fox. | |
A case against landowner Peter Rowley Williams, 48, of Llandwyfan, for permitting land to be used for hunting on the same day, was dropped by the prosecution. |