This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-20389297

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
PM to crackdown on 'time-wasting' appeals PM to crack down on 'time-wasting' appeals
(about 2 hours later)
The right to legally challenge government policies will be limited to help bolster the economy, PM David Cameron is expected to say later. Ministers will crack down on "time-wasting" in the "massive growth industry" of legally challenging government policy, the PM is to say.
Opponents will have less time to apply for judicial review, face higher fees and will have their chances of appealing halved. David Cameron will tell business leaders he will "get a grip" on people forcing unnecessary delays.
Mr Cameron will tell business leaders this is so "people think twice about time-wasting" to delay developments. Opponents will have less time to apply for judicial review, face higher fees and have fewer chances to appeal.
He will call for wartime thinking when "rules were circumvented". He will also say the government is "too slow" in bringing in deficit reduction, pledging that must change.
Wartime spiritWartime spirit
In a speech to the CBI in London on Monday, Mr Cameron will say the country is in the "economic equivalent of war" and needs the "same spirit." The prime minister is expected to say the legal right to a judicial review of decisions, including major infrastructure projects, has grown out of control and must be scaled back, insisting: "We urgently need to get a grip on this.
He will argue for less bureaucracy as the emphasis is put on the pursuit of economic growth. "So here's what we're going to do: reduce the time limit when people can bring cases; charge more for reviews - so people think twice about time-wasting."
The prime minister is expected to say the legal right to a judicial review of decisions, including major infrastructure projects, will be scaled back, insisting: "We urgently need to get a grip on this".
It is unclear yet how much the fees would rise by for review applications or how far the three-month time limit for applications might be cut.It is unclear yet how much the fees would rise by for review applications or how far the three-month time limit for applications might be cut.
But he will add that "instead of giving hopeless cases up to four bites of the cherry to appeal a decision, we will halve that to two." But he will add that "instead of giving hopeless cases up to four bites of the cherry to appeal a decision, we will halve that to two".
Downing Street figures show more than 11,000 applications for judicial review were made in 2011, compared to just 160 in 1975. Around one in six applications was granted. Downing Street figures show more than 11,000 applications for judicial review were made in 2011, compared with just 160 in 1975.
He is expected to accept the government is "too slow in getting stuff done," amid concern about interested parties and that civil servants in Whitehall must appreciate delays are felt in "businesses going bust, jobs being lost" and "livelihoods being destroyed." 'Prosperous nation'
As well as pledging to crack down on judicial reviews, he will also argue for less Whitehall bureaucracy as the emphasis is put on the pursuit of economic growth.
He is expected to accept the government is "too slow in getting stuff done" and that civil servants must appreciate delays are felt in "businesses going bust, jobs being lost" and "livelihoods being destroyed".
"Consultations, impact assessments, audits, reviews, stakeholder management, securing professional buy-in, complying with EU procurement rules, assessing sector feedback - this is not how we became one of the most powerful, prosperous nations on earth," he will say.
"It's not how you get things done so I am determined to change this."
He will draw an analogy with how the country responded to fighting Hitler.He will draw an analogy with how the country responded to fighting Hitler.
"When this country was at war in the 40s, Whitehall underwent a revolution."When this country was at war in the 40s, Whitehall underwent a revolution.
"Normal rules were circumvented. Convention was thrown out. As one historian put it, everything was thrown at 'the overriding purpose' of beating Hitler."Normal rules were circumvented. Convention was thrown out. As one historian put it, everything was thrown at 'the overriding purpose' of beating Hitler.
"Well, this country is in the economic equivalent of war today - and we need the same spirit. We need to forget about crossing every 't' and dotting every 'i' - and we need to throw everything we've got at winning in this global race.""Well, this country is in the economic equivalent of war today - and we need the same spirit. We need to forget about crossing every 't' and dotting every 'i' - and we need to throw everything we've got at winning in this global race."
Earlier this year the government published a new planning framework designed to streamline planning.
But a draft version of the framework was amended amid fears from countryside groups that swathes of green belt land were being put at risk.
Elsewhere at the conference Labour leader Ed Miliband is also due to make a speech in which he will warn Britain is "sleepwalking" into leaving the European Union, a move which could undermine the UK's economy and leave it "voiceless and powerless".Elsewhere at the conference Labour leader Ed Miliband is also due to make a speech in which he will warn Britain is "sleepwalking" into leaving the European Union, a move which could undermine the UK's economy and leave it "voiceless and powerless".
What are your thoughts? Have you ever opposed a development where you live? Please fill in the form below if you are willing to be interviewed by the BBC. What are your thoughts? Have you ever been involved in seeking a judicial review? Please fill in the form below if you are willing to be interviewed by the BBC.