This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/undercover-with-paul-lewis-and-rob-evans/2012/nov/26/women-sue-over-undercover-spies

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Judge considers his verdict in women's legal action over undercover officers Judge considers his verdict in women's legal action over undercover officers
(about 1 month later)
The first round of the women's legal action against police chiefs drew to a close on Friday morning.The first round of the women's legal action against police chiefs drew to a close on Friday morning.
The judge hearing the case, Mr Justice Tugendhat, said he would go away and consider his judgment. It is not known how long he will take.The judge hearing the case, Mr Justice Tugendhat, said he would go away and consider his judgment. It is not known how long he will take.
He is deciding whether to approve an application by the police to have the women's legal action struck out of the High Court and shunted over to a little-known, secretive tribunal that usually hears complaints about MI5 (see this for some background).He is deciding whether to approve an application by the police to have the women's legal action struck out of the High Court and shunted over to a little-known, secretive tribunal that usually hears complaints about MI5 (see this for some background).
Ten women and one man have launched a legal action claiming they were tricked into forming deeply personal relationships with the police spies. The women say they were duped into forming long-term, sexual relationships lasting years with undercover officers.Ten women and one man have launched a legal action claiming they were tricked into forming deeply personal relationships with the police spies. The women say they were duped into forming long-term, sexual relationships lasting years with undercover officers.
See here and here for some coverage of last week's proceedings. For a long account of the hearings, read this from researcher and author, Eveline Lubbers.See here and here for some coverage of last week's proceedings. For a long account of the hearings, read this from researcher and author, Eveline Lubbers.
The hearings, spread over two and a bit days, were very dry, and full of pretty tedious legal argument. The barristers spent hours arguing over the meaning of specific words and clauses in an act - the regulation of investigatory powers act 2000 - which in itself is complicated and obtuse.The hearings, spread over two and a bit days, were very dry, and full of pretty tedious legal argument. The barristers spent hours arguing over the meaning of specific words and clauses in an act - the regulation of investigatory powers act 2000 - which in itself is complicated and obtuse.
However the hearings are of crucial, tactical importance in the legal action as a whole.However the hearings are of crucial, tactical importance in the legal action as a whole.
Clearly it would be a significant defeat for the police chiefs if they lose their attempt to have it all moved over to the secretive Investigatory Powers Tribunal.Clearly it would be a significant defeat for the police chiefs if they lose their attempt to have it all moved over to the secretive Investigatory Powers Tribunal.
But what might happen if the judge decided that it should be heard in the High Court?But what might happen if the judge decided that it should be heard in the High Court?
There is a strong chance, you would have thought, that the police chiefs would settle out of court before it was due to be heard in the High Court.There is a strong chance, you would have thought, that the police chiefs would settle out of court before it was due to be heard in the High Court.
As we noted here previously, the question is - do the police chiefs really want to endure the bad publicity of a High Court case in which the heart-breaking stories of the women are recounted day after day? Probably not.As we noted here previously, the question is - do the police chiefs really want to endure the bad publicity of a High Court case in which the heart-breaking stories of the women are recounted day after day? Probably not.
After all, this case is about, as the women say, "one of the most intrusive invasions of privacy imaginable", not turgid arguments about obscure clauses in an obscure act.After all, this case is about, as the women say, "one of the most intrusive invasions of privacy imaginable", not turgid arguments about obscure clauses in an obscure act.
The women have received support from as far away as Berlin - see this report of a demonstration there.The women have received support from as far away as Berlin - see this report of a demonstration there.
guardian.co.uk today is our daily snapshot of the top news stories, sent to your inbox at 8am Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe.