This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/28/world/europe/panel-to-question-top-bbc-figures-about-abuse-scandals.html

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Top BBC Figures Acknowledge ‘Errors’ in Reporting Scandals Top BBC Figures Acknowledge ‘Errors’ in Reporting Scandals
(35 minutes later)
Two of the most senior figures at the British Broadcasting Corporation said on Tuesday that there had been “basic” and “elementary” failures of the organization’s journalism when it wrongly implicated a former Conservative Party politician in sexual abuse, compounding a scandal that cost the BBC’s director general his job and plunged the organization deeper into crisis.Two of the most senior figures at the British Broadcasting Corporation said on Tuesday that there had been “basic” and “elementary” failures of the organization’s journalism when it wrongly implicated a former Conservative Party politician in sexual abuse, compounding a scandal that cost the BBC’s director general his job and plunged the organization deeper into crisis.
Chris Patten, the head of the supervisory BBC Trust, and Tim Davie, the acting director general, were addressing a parliamentary panel known for often aggressive interrogations in scandals at Britain’s newspapers and broadcasters. They were speaking just days before an another inquiry into the separate phone-hacking scandal, mainly at Rupert Murdoch’s British newspaper outpost, delivers a long-awaited report that could lead to tighter regulation of the rambunctious British press. Chris Patten, the head of the supervisory BBC Trust, and Tim Davie, the acting director general, were addressing a parliamentary panel known for often aggressive interrogations in scandals at Britain’s newspapers and broadcasters. They were speaking just days before an another inquiry into the separate phone hacking scandal, mainly at Rupert Murdoch’s British newspaper outpost, is to deliver a long-awaited report that could lead to tighter regulation of the rambunctious British press.
The combination of inquiries and findings seemed to illustrate once more the intensity of the scrutiny faced by journalists and editors in Britain at a time when the news business is struggling to make a painful and costly adjustment to the digital era. The newspaper scandal, in particular, has drawn in British politicians, including Prime Minister David Cameron, who have testified about what seems to have been a cozy relationship with Murdoch executives. The combination of inquiries and findings seemed to illustrate once more the intense scrutiny faced by journalists and editors in Britain at a time when the news business is struggling to make a painful and costly adjustment to the digital era. The newspaper scandal, in particular, has drawn in British politicians, including Prime Minister David Cameron, who have testified about what seems to have been a cozy relationship with Murdoch executives.
But Mr. Davie said that, while the BBC, a British national institution, was going through a “major crisis,” it was not in “chaos.” But Mr. Davie said that, while the BBC, a British national institution, was going through a “major crisis,” it was not in chaos. “This is not an organization that is falling apart internally,” he said.
He added: “This is not an organization that is falling apart internally.”
Lord Patten, who was Britain’s last governor in Hong Kong in the 1990s, has played a central and frequently contentious role in seeking to find a way out of the BBC’s current crisis. Mr. Davie, a former head of BBC radio operations, has been the interim head of the BBC since George Entwistle resigned as director general on Nov. 10 after only 54 days in office. Sitting side by side to face lawmakers, the two men were appearing before the panel for the first time since Mr. Entwistle’s departure.Lord Patten, who was Britain’s last governor in Hong Kong in the 1990s, has played a central and frequently contentious role in seeking to find a way out of the BBC’s current crisis. Mr. Davie, a former head of BBC radio operations, has been the interim head of the BBC since George Entwistle resigned as director general on Nov. 10 after only 54 days in office. Sitting side by side to face lawmakers, the two men were appearing before the panel for the first time since Mr. Entwistle’s departure.
“I think we have done the right thing in the right way and we must bear the costs however much they are,” Lord Patten said, referring to the BBC’s handling of the crisis and the likely costs of inquiring into what he called “shoddy” journalism. “I think we have done the right thing in the right way and we must bear the costs, however much they are,” Lord Patten said, referring to the BBC’s handling of the crisis and the inquiry into what he called “shoddy” journalism.
One issue the parliamentary select committee on culture, media and sport said it wants to explore is a decision by Lord Patten to authorize resignation benefits to Mr. Entwistle including a payoff equivalent to a full year’s salary of $750,000, twice the contractual obligation.One issue the parliamentary select committee on culture, media and sport said it wants to explore is a decision by Lord Patten to authorize resignation benefits to Mr. Entwistle including a payoff equivalent to a full year’s salary of $750,000, twice the contractual obligation.
Mr. Entwistle appeared before the panel on Oct. 23 when its attention was focused on a decision a year ago by the editor of the “Newsnight” current affairs program to cancel an investigation into the sexual misconduct of Jimmy Savile, a longtime television host who died in Oct. 2011 at age 84. Lord Patten said on Tuesday that, in negotiations with Mr. Entwistle, “we either had to deal with it quickly there and then, broadly speaking on the terms of 12 months” salary as a payoff, or go though other procedures for compensation based on constructive and unfair dismissal, which would have cost the corporation a further $128,000.
“What did we get in return?” Lord Patten said. “First of all, we got a settlement that was less than we would have got had we gone through constructive dismissal.” And second, he said, if any of the current inquiries finds that Mr. Entwistle “has done anything which is in breach of his contract or the BBC disciplinary guidelines, we can claw back some of the remunerations that has been paid.”
Mr. Entwistle appeared before the panel on Oct. 23 when its attention was focused on a decision a year ago by the editor of the “Newsnight” current affairs program to cancel an investigation into the sexual misconduct of Jimmy Savile, a longtime television host who died in Oct. 2011 at age 84. The BBC was also preparing Christmastime programs paying tribute to Mr. Savile.
At that time, Mr. Entwistle was in charge of television programming, while the director general was Mark Thompson, who resigned in September to become the president and chief executive of The New York Times Company. Mr. Thompson appeared on Friday before a separate closed-door inquiry in London into the cancellation of the “Newsnight” segment last year.At that time, Mr. Entwistle was in charge of television programming, while the director general was Mark Thompson, who resigned in September to become the president and chief executive of The New York Times Company. Mr. Thompson appeared on Friday before a separate closed-door inquiry in London into the cancellation of the “Newsnight” segment last year.
Since the panel’s session with Mr. Entwistle on Oct. 23, the scandal has widened after a “Newsnight” broadcast on Nov. 2 wrongfully implicated a former Conservative Party politician in sexual abuse at a children’s home in North Wales during the Thatcher era. Events in that imbroglio forced Mr. Entwistle to resign. He appeared with Lord Patten at his side to announced his decision on a Saturday night in London.Since the panel’s session with Mr. Entwistle on Oct. 23, the scandal has widened after a “Newsnight” broadcast on Nov. 2 wrongfully implicated a former Conservative Party politician in sexual abuse at a children’s home in North Wales during the Thatcher era. Events in that imbroglio forced Mr. Entwistle to resign. He appeared with Lord Patten at his side to announced his decision on a Saturday night in London.
Lord Patten said on Tuesday that the second “Newsnight” program showed “appalling editorial judgment. The journalism was — to be polite — shoddy.” The error made in broadcasting unfounded allegations, he said, was a “more major error” than the cancellation of the earlier program, he said.Lord Patten said on Tuesday that the second “Newsnight” program showed “appalling editorial judgment. The journalism was — to be polite — shoddy.” The error made in broadcasting unfounded allegations, he said, was a “more major error” than the cancellation of the earlier program, he said.
He added: “This was a terribly elementary journalistic failure.”He added: “This was a terribly elementary journalistic failure.”
Mr. Davie said many journalists at the BBC were “aghast at the basic error that was made.”Mr. Davie said many journalists at the BBC were “aghast at the basic error that was made.”
“This is just a basic journalistic failure and it is as simple as that,” he said. A BBC inquiry into the second “Newsnight” episode found that journalists failed to give a right of reply to the person they implicated and did not ask his accuser to positively identify him. The report implicated but did not directly identify Alistair McAlpine, the former treasurer of the Conservative Party. Lord McAlpine has since reached out-of-court libel settlements with the BBC for about $295,000 and with its main commercial rival, ITV, for some $200,000. Last week, the BBC announced that Tony Hall, the head of the Royal Opera House, would take over as the broadcaster’s director general next year. “This is just a basic journalistic failure and it is as simple as that,” he said. A BBC inquiry into the second “Newsnight” episode found that journalists failed to give a right of reply to the person they implicated and did not ask his accuser to positively identify him. The report implicated but did not directly identify Alistair McAlpine, the former treasurer of the Conservative Party. Lord McAlpine has since reached out of court libel settlements with the BBC for about $295,000 and with its main commercial rival, ITV, for about $200,000. Last week, the BBC announced that Tony Hall, the head of the Royal Opera House, would take over as the BBC’s director general next year.
Between now and then the British print and broadcast industries face a thicket of inquiries. The BBC has launched two internal investigations. One is into the cancellation of the “Newsnight” segment, led by Nick Pollard, a former head of the rival Sky News, and the other is into the culture and practices of the BBC over decades, led by Dame Janet Smith, a former appeals court judge known for conducting an earlier inquiry into a notorious serial killer.Between now and then the British print and broadcast industries face a thicket of inquiries. The BBC has launched two internal investigations. One is into the cancellation of the “Newsnight” segment, led by Nick Pollard, a former head of the rival Sky News, and the other is into the culture and practices of the BBC over decades, led by Dame Janet Smith, a former appeals court judge known for conducting an earlier inquiry into a notorious serial killer.
The parliamentary panel is also likely to call further witnesses while, on Thursday, much attention in Britain will be focused on the publication of the report by Lord Justice Sir Brian Leveson, who has conducted lengthy inquiries into the phone hacking scandal, with witnesses including Mr. Murdoch and his son James testifying publicly and under oath.The parliamentary panel is also likely to call further witnesses while, on Thursday, much attention in Britain will be focused on the publication of the report by Lord Justice Sir Brian Leveson, who has conducted lengthy inquiries into the phone hacking scandal, with witnesses including Mr. Murdoch and his son James testifying publicly and under oath.
Apart from those inquiries, Scotland Yard has launched three police investigations into phone hacking, computer hacking and the corruption of public officials. Scores of journalists, lawyers, executives and others have been arrested and questioned.Apart from those inquiries, Scotland Yard has launched three police investigations into phone hacking, computer hacking and the corruption of public officials. Scores of journalists, lawyers, executives and others have been arrested and questioned.
Last week, the Crown Prosecution Service announced corruption charges against two former top figures in Mr. Murdoch’s newspaper operations in Britain, Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson, who both denied the charges.Last week, the Crown Prosecution Service announced corruption charges against two former top figures in Mr. Murdoch’s newspaper operations in Britain, Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson, who both denied the charges.