This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/dec/12/royal-navy-officer-jailed-russia

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Royal Navy officer jailed for trying to pass secrets to Russia Royal Navy submariner jailed for trying to pass secrets to Russia
(about 1 hour later)
A Royal Navy petty officer has been jailed for eight years for trying to pass Britain's nuclear submarine secrets to men he believed to be Russian spies. A Royal Navy submariner who tried to pass secrets to the Russians that could have undermined the UK's national security has been jailed for eight years by an Old Bailey judge who condemned his attempted betrayal.
Edward Devenney, 30, was told he had betrayed his country and his colleagues. Mr Justice Saunders, sentencing him at the Old Bailey, said Devenney knew what he was doing when he met the two men in January. Edward Devenney, 30, had not realised that the two men to whom he was trying to give secret intelligence were not members of the Russian secret service, but agents working for MI5.
He added: "He did supply details of movements and operations carried out and to be carried out by nuclear submarines. The trap ensured that Devenney did not pass any material that could have endangered Britain's nuclear submarine fleet, but Mr Justice Saunders said this was a serious case and that the petty officer, from Country Tyrone, Northern Ireland, needed to receive "a proper punishment".
"I am satisfied that in the wrong hands it was capable of affecting the operational effectiveness of nuclear submarines. "He did supply details of movements and operations carried out and to be carried out by nuclear submarines," he said.
"This is a very serious case. The defendant was prepared to betray his country and his colleagues." "The court has to mark the defendant's attempted betrayal of not only his country but also his colleagues who must feel great anger at his behaviour."
Devenney, from Northern Ireland, had suffered as a result of a rape allegation of which he was cleared, the court heard. But by January this year, when he met the men in London, Devenney was a "controlled and rational man". Devenney had been in the Royal Navy for more than 11 years and had worked on three of the UK's four Trident submarines when he hatched his plan late 2011. He was not motivated by money, but by a sense of anger and betrayal that his career had stalled, the court was told.
No damage had been done to national security because the Russians were in fact MI5 intelligence officers, but Devenney had not known that. At the time he was drinking heavily and had suffered bouts of depression following a court case in 2010 during which he had been accused of rape. Devenney was cleared.
He pleaded guilty to breaching the Official Secrets Act by gathering classified information and misconduct by meeting the supposed spies. The judge admitted the allegation had clearly affected Devenney's behaviour, but said that he was "completely in control of himself" by the time he had set up the meeting with the two "Russian" men in January this year. By then Devenney had already made a series of phone calls to the Russian embassy and had photographed code-breaking technology on board the Trident submarine HMS Vigilant using his girlfriend's mobile phone.
Outside court, solicitor Richard Cannon read a statement on behalf of Devenney: "I am deeply sorry for the hurt and shame that I have brought on my family and loved ones. Mark Dennis, prosecuting, said Devenney was contacted by a man called Dimitri, a British agent who was posing as a Russian spy. At first Devenney appeared to have seen through the ruse, telling the agent: "Your accent sounds remarkably fake, like British intelligence."
"Prior to these events I gave the Royal Navy 11½ years of service and I deeply regret my actions and the effect they have had on the submarine service and colleagues." But Devenney persevered and was introduced to another MI5 agent, who claimed his name was Vladimir.
Devenney agreed to meet them at the British Museum in central London on 28 January and accompanied the two agents to a nearby hotel room.
It was there Devenney disclosed details about the sailing dates of HMS Vigilant, which was due to travel to the west Atlantic for missile testing. He also had information about HMS Vengeance and a top-secret operation undertaken by HMS Trafalgar.
The court was told pictures he had taken were an "essential piece of the jigsaw" that would allow enemies to break navy codes used to communicate with Nato allies. The codes have been in use for decades and have yet to be compromised.
Dennis said disclosing sailing dates could allow enemies to record and identify the "unique signature" of British submarines.
"Once the signature is captured and identified, then that submarine has lost its most critical capability, namely the ability to be deployed covertly and without detection," he said.
During sentencing, the judge said Devenney had "made determined efforts to enter into an agreement to supply secret information to representatives of another country". He added: "The reason he later gave for his actions was that he wished to get his own back on the Royal Navy who he considered had treated him badly. The objective evidence is that the Royal Navy treated him well."
Devenney admitted collecting information about cryptography technology between 18 November last year and 7 March this year.
He also pleaded guilty to misconduct in a public office by "attempting to set up and continue a covert relationship with a foreign power with the intention to harm the Royal Navy".
Outside court, Devenney's lawyer Richard Cannon read a statement on his behalf.
"I am deeply sorry for the hurt and shame that I have brought on my family and loved ones," it said. "I deeply regret my actions and the effect they have had on the Submarine Service and colleagues."
Mari Reid, unit head for the CPS counter-terrorism division, said: "This was a classic story of betrayal.Mari Reid, unit head for the CPS counter-terrorism division, said: "This was a classic story of betrayal.
"Edward Devenney was employed by the Royal Navy to protect this country from potential threats to our security. Instead, he pursued a course of conduct likely to put his country at risk. "Edward Devenney was employed by the Royal Navy to protect this country from potential threats to our security. Instead, he pursued a course of conduct likely to put his country at risk."
"We rely on the men and women of our armed forces to keep us safe. It is hard to imagine a greater breach of that role than Devenney's actions."
The court heard that Devenney rang the Russian embassy in November last year, after what he said was a 12-hour drinking binge.
He thought he had been treated badly by the Royal Navy because he was not promoted to chief petty officer.
Two days later, he managed to get into a locked safe on board HMS Vigilant and take three photographs of part of a secret code for encrypted information.
The judge said: "The photographs could, with other information, have led to the breaking of the code."
He added: "The defendant made determined efforts to enter into an agreement to supply secret information to representatives of another country.
"The reason he later gave for his actions was that he wished to get his own back on the Royal Navy who he considered had treated him badly."
But the judge added: "The objective evidence is that the Royal Navy treated him well."