This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/20/afghan-end-game
The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 4 | Version 5 |
|---|---|
| Afghan end game | Afghan end game |
| (4 months later) | |
| In your advance report of the prime minister's welcome decision to speed up withdrawal from Afghanistan (4,000 British troops to leave Afghanistan next year, 19 December), you comment that it "will fire the starting gun for other Nato countries also looking to leave". In fact, President Hollande of France has already carried out his undertaking to leave immediately, and the French troops remaining number only a few hundred. Germany has announced that it is accelerating its withdrawal and Australia is also leaving, currently down to about 1,000 men. The defence secretary, Philip Hammond, told parliament that the withdrawal plan is based on current UK military advice. That is not enough. The modalities of withdrawal are for the military, but the decision on withdrawal is for the government. It should not be timed to suit the Americans or the generals, but to avoid losing more British and Afghan lives in what has become a lost cause. Oliver Miles Oxford | In your advance report of the prime minister's welcome decision to speed up withdrawal from Afghanistan (4,000 British troops to leave Afghanistan next year, 19 December), you comment that it "will fire the starting gun for other Nato countries also looking to leave". In fact, President Hollande of France has already carried out his undertaking to leave immediately, and the French troops remaining number only a few hundred. Germany has announced that it is accelerating its withdrawal and Australia is also leaving, currently down to about 1,000 men. The defence secretary, Philip Hammond, told parliament that the withdrawal plan is based on current UK military advice. That is not enough. The modalities of withdrawal are for the military, but the decision on withdrawal is for the government. It should not be timed to suit the Americans or the generals, but to avoid losing more British and Afghan lives in what has become a lost cause. Oliver Miles Oxford |
| Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. |