This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/dec/25/tory-mp-benefits-gambling-industry

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
Tory MP received benefits from gambling industry links Tory MP received benefits from gambling industry links
(4 months later)
A Tory member of an influential parliamentary select committee received more than £10,000 in benefits from companies with links to the gambling industry which he did not declare during a contentious year-long inquiry into the betting trade. Philip Davies, a rightwing Conservative MP and prominent member of the culture, media and sport select committee argued that in one case he did not have to declare the benefit and in the other that the firm was not directly linked to bookmakers.A Tory member of an influential parliamentary select committee received more than £10,000 in benefits from companies with links to the gambling industry which he did not declare during a contentious year-long inquiry into the betting trade. Philip Davies, a rightwing Conservative MP and prominent member of the culture, media and sport select committee argued that in one case he did not have to declare the benefit and in the other that the firm was not directly linked to bookmakers.
In March 2011 he was taken to the Cheltenham festival – a trip worth £870 – as a guest of bookmaker Ladbrokes. He failed to mention this when he quizzed Richard Glynn, the chief executive of Ladbrokes, six months later during a select committee session.In March 2011 he was taken to the Cheltenham festival – a trip worth £870 – as a guest of bookmaker Ladbrokes. He failed to mention this when he quizzed Richard Glynn, the chief executive of Ladbrokes, six months later during a select committee session.
The parliamentarian has also been given an annual "subscription" worth £4,680 from Peninsula Business Services, run by Peter Done – one of two brothers who founded BetFred, a bookmaker with 1,000 betting shops in Britain and which took over the Tote. Done remains a shareholder in BetFred's holding company.The parliamentarian has also been given an annual "subscription" worth £4,680 from Peninsula Business Services, run by Peter Done – one of two brothers who founded BetFred, a bookmaker with 1,000 betting shops in Britain and which took over the Tote. Done remains a shareholder in BetFred's holding company.
The parliamentary code of conduct makes it clear that where members have a financial interest "directly affected by a particular inquiry" or a "personal interest [that] may reflect upon the work of the committee" then the MP should consider stepping aside from proceedings. If MPs decide not to, the code says "a member should make a declaration of interest at an early stage in any inquiry to which that interest particularly relates. If the interest is especially relevant to one witness or group of witnesses appearing before the committee, the interest should be declared again at the appropriate session of evidence" [see footnote].The parliamentary code of conduct makes it clear that where members have a financial interest "directly affected by a particular inquiry" or a "personal interest [that] may reflect upon the work of the committee" then the MP should consider stepping aside from proceedings. If MPs decide not to, the code says "a member should make a declaration of interest at an early stage in any inquiry to which that interest particularly relates. If the interest is especially relevant to one witness or group of witnesses appearing before the committee, the interest should be declared again at the appropriate session of evidence" [see footnote].
Davies, who worked in a bookmakers in his late teens, told the Guardian that "to be perfectly honest it never even crossed my mind. I think it is fair to say that everyone knows I used to be a bookmaker. I did not think I had interests to declare."Davies, who worked in a bookmakers in his late teens, told the Guardian that "to be perfectly honest it never even crossed my mind. I think it is fair to say that everyone knows I used to be a bookmaker. I did not think I had interests to declare."
When asked about Peninsula, he said that the link to BetFred was "just a coincidence". He said the company offered the £9,000-worth of subscriptions for a service that relates to employment tribunals after "a constituent got in contact asking for advice on vexatious claims from employees". Davies said that only "if I was talking about employment tribunals in parliament, then I would declare an interest".When asked about Peninsula, he said that the link to BetFred was "just a coincidence". He said the company offered the £9,000-worth of subscriptions for a service that relates to employment tribunals after "a constituent got in contact asking for advice on vexatious claims from employees". Davies said that only "if I was talking about employment tribunals in parliament, then I would declare an interest".
Davies championed the industry viewpoint during the year-long investigation into the betting industry while on the select committee, and visited casino resorts in Australia and China's Macao to see "high-rollers" in action. Last July, MPs recommended rules on casinos and slot machines be relaxed – which the industry welcomed, but campaigners said would lead to problem gambling. In the Commons, Davies described this as nonsensical. He claimed gambling "employs more than 100,000 people and contributes more than £1.4bn to the exchequer".Davies championed the industry viewpoint during the year-long investigation into the betting industry while on the select committee, and visited casino resorts in Australia and China's Macao to see "high-rollers" in action. Last July, MPs recommended rules on casinos and slot machines be relaxed – which the industry welcomed, but campaigners said would lead to problem gambling. In the Commons, Davies described this as nonsensical. He claimed gambling "employs more than 100,000 people and contributes more than £1.4bn to the exchequer".
At the heart of debate is whether the committee is right to call for the lifting on the limited number of high-stakes gambling machines allowed in each betting shop. Currently, bookmakers are limited to four machines per shop. The machines are hugely lucrative, bringing in on average £900 a week in profits, so bookmakers have bypassed the restriction by opening more branches in high streets – often "clustering" in poorer areas.At the heart of debate is whether the committee is right to call for the lifting on the limited number of high-stakes gambling machines allowed in each betting shop. Currently, bookmakers are limited to four machines per shop. The machines are hugely lucrative, bringing in on average £900 a week in profits, so bookmakers have bypassed the restriction by opening more branches in high streets – often "clustering" in poorer areas.
The outcry has led to Ed Miliband, Labour leader, asking for the government not to implement the committee's report. Ministers are due to announce their decision in January.The outcry has led to Ed Miliband, Labour leader, asking for the government not to implement the committee's report. Ministers are due to announce their decision in January.
Labour MP David Lammy, who has campaigned against the spread of betting shops in his deprived north London constituency, called on ministers to reject a report tainted by industry lobbying. He said: "It is clear that the bookmaking industry has mounted a formidable lobbying campaign to influence the content of the select committee report into the Gambling Act 2005."Labour MP David Lammy, who has campaigned against the spread of betting shops in his deprived north London constituency, called on ministers to reject a report tainted by industry lobbying. He said: "It is clear that the bookmaking industry has mounted a formidable lobbying campaign to influence the content of the select committee report into the Gambling Act 2005."
"Not only do the industry want to withhold the truth about how the act has led to an explosion in bookmaker profits, they now want even more deregulation to have even more gaming machines in each outlet. The government cannot adopt one iota of a report that is effectively a Christmas list written by the bookmakers, for the bookmakers.""Not only do the industry want to withhold the truth about how the act has led to an explosion in bookmaker profits, they now want even more deregulation to have even more gaming machines in each outlet. The government cannot adopt one iota of a report that is effectively a Christmas list written by the bookmakers, for the bookmakers."
• This article was amended on 2 January 2013 and this footnote was itself amended on 21 January 2012. The original story stated that Davies' visit to Cheltenham took place "last March". This has been corrected to March 2011. The subheading has been amended because the original implied that Davies received all the benefits during the course of the select committee inquiry. In addition, it would have been fairer had the original story made clear that before the inquiry started Davies had registered those benefits in the register of members' interests.• This article was amended on 2 January 2013 and this footnote was itself amended on 21 January 2012. The original story stated that Davies' visit to Cheltenham took place "last March". This has been corrected to March 2011. The subheading has been amended because the original implied that Davies received all the benefits during the course of the select committee inquiry. In addition, it would have been fairer had the original story made clear that before the inquiry started Davies had registered those benefits in the register of members' interests.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox every weekday.