This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-21258653

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Shell Nigeria case: Court acquits firm on most charges Shell Nigeria case: Court acquits firm on most charges
(35 minutes later)
A Dutch court has rejected four out of five allegations against Anglo-Dutch oil giant Shell over oil pollution in Nigeria's Niger Delta region.A Dutch court has rejected four out of five allegations against Anglo-Dutch oil giant Shell over oil pollution in Nigeria's Niger Delta region.
But it found a subsidiary of the firm, Shell Nigeria, responsible for one case of pollution, ordering it to pay compensation to a Nigerian farmer.But it found a subsidiary of the firm, Shell Nigeria, responsible for one case of pollution, ordering it to pay compensation to a Nigerian farmer.
Shell said it was "happy" with the verdict in the landmark case.Shell said it was "happy" with the verdict in the landmark case.
The case was brought by four Nigerian farmers and Friends of the Earth, which says it is "flabbergasted".The case was brought by four Nigerian farmers and Friends of the Earth, which says it is "flabbergasted".
The campaign group says it intends to appeal.The campaign group says it intends to appeal.
It launched the case in 2008 in the Netherlands, where Shell has its global headquarters, seeking reparations for lost income from contaminated land and waterways in the Niger Delta region.It launched the case in 2008 in the Netherlands, where Shell has its global headquarters, seeking reparations for lost income from contaminated land and waterways in the Niger Delta region.
'Fish ponds poisoned''Fish ponds poisoned'
It is the first time a Dutch-registered company has been sued in a domestic court for offences allegedly carried out by a foreign subsidiary.It is the first time a Dutch-registered company has been sued in a domestic court for offences allegedly carried out by a foreign subsidiary.
"We are very pleased with the verdict," Allard Castelein, of Shell, said after the verdict was announced. "We are very pleased with the verdict," Allard Castelein, of Shell, said after it was announced.
"First of all I should say that we were never pleased with the court case in its own right but we are very pleased that the parent company is not liable under any of the complaints issued.""First of all I should say that we were never pleased with the court case in its own right but we are very pleased that the parent company is not liable under any of the complaints issued."
The case was linked to spills in four areas of the Niger Delta - Goi, Ogoniland, Oruma in Bayelsa State and a third in Ikot Ada Udo, Akwa Ibom State.The case was linked to spills in four areas of the Niger Delta - Goi, Ogoniland, Oruma in Bayelsa State and a third in Ikot Ada Udo, Akwa Ibom State.
The farmers had alleged that oil spills had poisoned their fish ponds and farmland with leaking pipelines.The farmers had alleged that oil spills had poisoned their fish ponds and farmland with leaking pipelines.
The court found that the spills were not the result of a lack of security or upkeep but due to sabotage.The court found that the spills were not the result of a lack of security or upkeep but due to sabotage.
"The district court has established that four oil spills were not caused by defective maintenance by Shell but by sabotage from third parties," the court said in its judgement. The court "dismissed all claims against the parent companies... since pursuant to Nigerian law a parent company in principle is not obliged to prevent its subsidiaries from harming third parties abroad," Judge Henk Wien told the court.
It said that, according to Nigerian law, the parent company was not responsible for damage caused in this way.
However, in one case, it found subsidiary Shell Nigeria culpable of neglecting its duty of care and ruled that: "Shell could and should have prevented this sabotage in an easy way".However, in one case, it found subsidiary Shell Nigeria culpable of neglecting its duty of care and ruled that: "Shell could and should have prevented this sabotage in an easy way".
The level of damages in that case will be established at a later hearing.The level of damages in that case will be established at a later hearing.
The Shell Petroleum Development Co is the largest oil and gas company in Nigeria - Africa's top energy producer - with an output of more than one million barrels of oil or equivalent per day.The Shell Petroleum Development Co is the largest oil and gas company in Nigeria - Africa's top energy producer - with an output of more than one million barrels of oil or equivalent per day.
Only one of the Nigerian plaintiffs, Eric Barizaadooh, was in court Wednesday and his claim was rejected but he said he was happy for the village that won compensation.
"For my colleagues who succeeded, that is victory," he said.
"Shell is brought to book. I believe this is a revolutionary case."