This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/10/obama-allies-urge-drone-scrutiny

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Obama allies urge greater scrutiny of drones policy Obama allies urge greater scrutiny of drones policy
(30 days later)
President Barack Obama's use of unmanned drones to kill Americans who are suspected of being al-Qaida allies deserves closer inspection, lawmakers said on Sunday, as even some of the president's allies suggested uneasiness about the program.President Barack Obama's use of unmanned drones to kill Americans who are suspected of being al-Qaida allies deserves closer inspection, lawmakers said on Sunday, as even some of the president's allies suggested uneasiness about the program.
Obama's stance toward the terrorist threats facing the United States has left some Democrats and Republicans nervous about unmanned drones targeting the nation's enemies from the skies. Questions about the deadly program dogged Obama's pick to lead the CIA last week and prompted lawmakers to consider tighter oversight. Killings carried out under the drone program have ballooned on Obama's watch.Obama's stance toward the terrorist threats facing the United States has left some Democrats and Republicans nervous about unmanned drones targeting the nation's enemies from the skies. Questions about the deadly program dogged Obama's pick to lead the CIA last week and prompted lawmakers to consider tighter oversight. Killings carried out under the drone program have ballooned on Obama's watch.
"We are in a different kind of war. We're not sending troops. We're not sending manned bombers. We're dealing with the enemy where we find them to keep America safe. We have to strike a new constitutional balance with the challenges we face today," said Senator Dick Durbin. "The policy is really unfolding. Most of this has not been disclosed.""We are in a different kind of war. We're not sending troops. We're not sending manned bombers. We're dealing with the enemy where we find them to keep America safe. We have to strike a new constitutional balance with the challenges we face today," said Senator Dick Durbin. "The policy is really unfolding. Most of this has not been disclosed."
Before John Brennan's confirmation hearing to lead the CIA on Thursday, Obama directed the justice department to give the congressional intelligence committees access to classified legal advice providing the government's rationale for drone strikes against American citizens working with al-Qaida abroad. That 2012 memo outlined the Obama administration's decision to kill al-Qaida suspects without evidence that specific and imminent plots were being planned against the US.Before John Brennan's confirmation hearing to lead the CIA on Thursday, Obama directed the justice department to give the congressional intelligence committees access to classified legal advice providing the government's rationale for drone strikes against American citizens working with al-Qaida abroad. That 2012 memo outlined the Obama administration's decision to kill al-Qaida suspects without evidence that specific and imminent plots were being planned against the US.
The nomination of Brennan, Obama's counterterrorism adviser who oversaw many of the drone strikes, kick-started the discussion about how the United States prosecutes its fight against the terrorist group.The nomination of Brennan, Obama's counterterrorism adviser who oversaw many of the drone strikes, kick-started the discussion about how the United States prosecutes its fight against the terrorist group.
Senator Angus King, an independent, said he prefers a review before the remote-operated aircraft fire on someone.Senator Angus King, an independent, said he prefers a review before the remote-operated aircraft fire on someone.
"It just makes me uncomfortable that the president, whoever it is, is the prosecutor, the judge, the jury and the executioner, all rolled into one," King said. "So I'm not suggesting something that would slow down response, but where there is time to go in and submit it to a third party that is a court, in confidence, and get a judgment that yes there is sufficient evidence here.""It just makes me uncomfortable that the president, whoever it is, is the prosecutor, the judge, the jury and the executioner, all rolled into one," King said. "So I'm not suggesting something that would slow down response, but where there is time to go in and submit it to a third party that is a court, in confidence, and get a judgment that yes there is sufficient evidence here."
Former defense secretary Bob Gates, himself a former CIA chief, suggested that "some check" on a president's ability to order drone strikes against American al-Qaida operatives would be appropriate and lent support to creating a special court that would review such requests.Former defense secretary Bob Gates, himself a former CIA chief, suggested that "some check" on a president's ability to order drone strikes against American al-Qaida operatives would be appropriate and lent support to creating a special court that would review such requests.
"I think that the rules and the practices that the Obama administration has followed are quite stringent and are not being abused. But who is to say about a future president?" said Gates, who served under George W Bush and Obama."I think that the rules and the practices that the Obama administration has followed are quite stringent and are not being abused. But who is to say about a future president?" said Gates, who served under George W Bush and Obama.
The potential model that some lawmakers are considering for overseeing such drone attacks is a secret court of federal judges that now reviews requests for government surveillance in espionage and terrorism cases. In those proceedings, 11 federal judges review wiretap applications that enable the FBI and other agencies to gather evidence to build cases. Suspects have no lawyers present, as they would in other US courts, and the proceedings are secret.The potential model that some lawmakers are considering for overseeing such drone attacks is a secret court of federal judges that now reviews requests for government surveillance in espionage and terrorism cases. In those proceedings, 11 federal judges review wiretap applications that enable the FBI and other agencies to gather evidence to build cases. Suspects have no lawyers present, as they would in other US courts, and the proceedings are secret.
The Democratic leader of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Dianne Feinstein, said she intends to review proposals for "legislation to ensure that drone strikes are carried out in a manner consistent with our values".The Democratic leader of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Dianne Feinstein, said she intends to review proposals for "legislation to ensure that drone strikes are carried out in a manner consistent with our values".
Republicans seemed to oppose such an oversight proposal. The Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee said his members review all drone strikes on a monthly basis, both from the CIA and Pentagon. "There is plenty of oversight here," said Representative Mike Rogers. "There is not an American list somewhere overseas for targeting, that does not exist."Republicans seemed to oppose such an oversight proposal. The Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee said his members review all drone strikes on a monthly basis, both from the CIA and Pentagon. "There is plenty of oversight here," said Representative Mike Rogers. "There is not an American list somewhere overseas for targeting, that does not exist."
Other lawmakers seemed wary of the program's current reach even as they lined up against the oversight proposals. Republican senator John McCain said a Feinstein-backed oversight panel would be "an encroachment on the powers of the president of the United States".Other lawmakers seemed wary of the program's current reach even as they lined up against the oversight proposals. Republican senator John McCain said a Feinstein-backed oversight panel would be "an encroachment on the powers of the president of the United States".
"But what we need to do is take the whole program out of the hand of the Central Intelligence Agency and put it into the Department of Defense, where you have adequate oversight," McCain added. "Since when is the intelligence agency supposed to be an air force of drones that goes around killing people? I believe that it's a job for the department of defense.""But what we need to do is take the whole program out of the hand of the Central Intelligence Agency and put it into the Department of Defense, where you have adequate oversight," McCain added. "Since when is the intelligence agency supposed to be an air force of drones that goes around killing people? I believe that it's a job for the department of defense."
Republican Representative Tom Cole questioned whether America's intelligence operations were benefiting from the killings. "We are losing a lot of opportunities out there to actually extract people and get information," he said. "Human intelligence is really much more important than taking out individual targets."Republican Representative Tom Cole questioned whether America's intelligence operations were benefiting from the killings. "We are losing a lot of opportunities out there to actually extract people and get information," he said. "Human intelligence is really much more important than taking out individual targets."
During Thursday's hearing, Brennan defended drone strikes only as a "last resort", but he said he had no qualms about going after Anwar al-Awlaki in September 2011. A drone strike in Yemen killed al-Awlaki and Samir Khan, who were both US citizens. An air attack two weeks later killed al-Awlaki's 16-year-old son, a Denver native.During Thursday's hearing, Brennan defended drone strikes only as a "last resort", but he said he had no qualms about going after Anwar al-Awlaki in September 2011. A drone strike in Yemen killed al-Awlaki and Samir Khan, who were both US citizens. An air attack two weeks later killed al-Awlaki's 16-year-old son, a Denver native.
"I think it's very unseemly that a politician gets to decide the death of an American citizen," said Republican senator Rand Paul. "They should answer about the 16-year-old boy, al-Awlaki's son who was killed not as collateral damage, but in a separate strike.""I think it's very unseemly that a politician gets to decide the death of an American citizen," said Republican senator Rand Paul. "They should answer about the 16-year-old boy, al-Awlaki's son who was killed not as collateral damage, but in a separate strike."
Those strikes came after US intelligence concluded that the elder al-Awlaki was senior operational leader of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula plotting attacks on the US, including the failed Christmas Day bombing of an airplane landing in Detroit in 2009.Those strikes came after US intelligence concluded that the elder al-Awlaki was senior operational leader of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula plotting attacks on the US, including the failed Christmas Day bombing of an airplane landing in Detroit in 2009.
Lawmakers largely sided with the strategy, even if they differed on how precisely to execute it.Lawmakers largely sided with the strategy, even if they differed on how precisely to execute it.
"If you take up arms against America and you fight in a terrorist training camp or on the front lines in Pakistan or Afghanistan or Yemen, you shouldn't be surprised if America reaches out and exacts justice against you," said Republican representative Tom Cotton or Arkansas, who opposes bringing judges into the decision-making process."If you take up arms against America and you fight in a terrorist training camp or on the front lines in Pakistan or Afghanistan or Yemen, you shouldn't be surprised if America reaches out and exacts justice against you," said Republican representative Tom Cotton or Arkansas, who opposes bringing judges into the decision-making process.
guardian.co.uk today is our daily snapshot of the top news stories, sent to your inbox at 8am Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe.