This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/mar/14/leveson-talks-break-differences-parties

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Cameron accuses other parties of posturing after Leveson talks collapse Cameron accuses other parties of posturing after Leveson talks collapse
(7 months later)
David Cameron has accused Labour and the Liberal Democrats of posturing after the collapse of cross-party talks on proposed reforms to press regulation.David Cameron has accused Labour and the Liberal Democrats of posturing after the collapse of cross-party talks on proposed reforms to press regulation.
The prime minister announced plans to put Conservative proposals for a royal charter to introduce a new press regulator to a vote in the House of Commons on Monday. He said that the talks with other party leaders had been halted because the gap between them was too great.The prime minister announced plans to put Conservative proposals for a royal charter to introduce a new press regulator to a vote in the House of Commons on Monday. He said that the talks with other party leaders had been halted because the gap between them was too great.
His stance means that Cameron now faces a parliamentary battle next week to ensure his proposals are endorsed in the face of opposition from Labour and, potentially, the Liberal Democrats.His stance means that Cameron now faces a parliamentary battle next week to ensure his proposals are endorsed in the face of opposition from Labour and, potentially, the Liberal Democrats.
Cameron said: "I will urge all members on all sides of the house to support this approach. To put it simply they can back my amendments … Or they can grandstand and end up with a system that will not work."Cameron said: "I will urge all members on all sides of the house to support this approach. To put it simply they can back my amendments … Or they can grandstand and end up with a system that will not work."
His attitude infuriated campaigners and victims of phone hacking who want legislation to underpin the proposals put forward by Lord Justice Leveson.His attitude infuriated campaigners and victims of phone hacking who want legislation to underpin the proposals put forward by Lord Justice Leveson.
"I think the public will see that a means has been found for the prime minister to help his friends in the press," said Prof Brian Cathcart, director of the press victims' pressure group Hacked Off."I think the public will see that a means has been found for the prime minister to help his friends in the press," said Prof Brian Cathcart, director of the press victims' pressure group Hacked Off.
"[They] would have a veto over the people who would run the independent self regulator that Leveson proposed, they would have a means to filter complaints so they could pick and choose which they deal with and which they wouldn't and a self regulator which would not have the power to say: 'You have to publish a correction or apology somewhere near where the offence happened,'" he told BBC News."[They] would have a veto over the people who would run the independent self regulator that Leveson proposed, they would have a means to filter complaints so they could pick and choose which they deal with and which they wouldn't and a self regulator which would not have the power to say: 'You have to publish a correction or apology somewhere near where the offence happened,'" he told BBC News.
In a phone conversation between the three leaders on Thursday morning, Cameron told them they were trying to push him beyond a position he was comfortable with and beyond something the press would sign up to.In a phone conversation between the three leaders on Thursday morning, Cameron told them they were trying to push him beyond a position he was comfortable with and beyond something the press would sign up to.
Cameron then announced he would force the issue to a head by attaching an outline of his proposals as an amendment to the crime and courts bill when MPs vote on Monday night, claiming the alternative would be further difficult negotiations and the risk that several pieces of legislation could be blocked from being passed by continuing amendments and debate.Cameron then announced he would force the issue to a head by attaching an outline of his proposals as an amendment to the crime and courts bill when MPs vote on Monday night, claiming the alternative would be further difficult negotiations and the risk that several pieces of legislation could be blocked from being passed by continuing amendments and debate.
The PM's proposals include letting the new regulator levy fines of up to £1m against newspapers and force them to issue "proper" apologies, all backed up by a royal charter rather than legislation. Newspapers that refused to join the new body would face potentially much more expensive "exemplary damages".The PM's proposals include letting the new regulator levy fines of up to £1m against newspapers and force them to issue "proper" apologies, all backed up by a royal charter rather than legislation. Newspapers that refused to join the new body would face potentially much more expensive "exemplary damages".
"The talks have been good-natured talks," he said. "But there are a handful of pretty fundamental differences between the parties. But the danger is that we won't have an option on the table without action. I have chosen action over inaction. I have made a choice.""The talks have been good-natured talks," he said. "But there are a handful of pretty fundamental differences between the parties. But the danger is that we won't have an option on the table without action. I have chosen action over inaction. I have made a choice."
In what appeared to signal a possible compromise between the party leaders, however, Cameron then suggested he would accept "two or three lines of legislation" to give statutory legitimacy to his proposed royal charter.In what appeared to signal a possible compromise between the party leaders, however, Cameron then suggested he would accept "two or three lines of legislation" to give statutory legitimacy to his proposed royal charter.
"I don't believe that's necessary, that won't be in my proposals, but of course there's a world of difference between a full-on legislative solution and a modest underpinning statutory clause that basically says we shouldn't be able to change this royal charter easily.""I don't believe that's necessary, that won't be in my proposals, but of course there's a world of difference between a full-on legislative solution and a modest underpinning statutory clause that basically says we shouldn't be able to change this royal charter easily."
A senior Labour source said: "The prime minister's decision is very disappointing. "We still hope for an agreement. We still believe there can be an agreement. We urge the prime minister to reflect on his actions."A senior Labour source said: "The prime minister's decision is very disappointing. "We still hope for an agreement. We still believe there can be an agreement. We urge the prime minister to reflect on his actions."
And a senior Lib Dem source said Cameron had made the decision to pull the plug on cross-party talks "unilaterally" and the Liberal Democrats were now considering their next step. "We were very surprised and disappointed," said the source.And a senior Lib Dem source said Cameron had made the decision to pull the plug on cross-party talks "unilaterally" and the Liberal Democrats were now considering their next step. "We were very surprised and disappointed," said the source.
"We thought we were making real progress and inching towards a deal, but the prime minister has unilaterally decided to pull the plug on cross-party talks."We thought we were making real progress and inching towards a deal, but the prime minister has unilaterally decided to pull the plug on cross-party talks.
"We are still prepared to work with politicians of all parties, including the Conservatives, who want to work with others to implement Leveson.""We are still prepared to work with politicians of all parties, including the Conservatives, who want to work with others to implement Leveson."
Asked whether Lib Dems would vote with Labour against the royal charter proposals on Monday, the source said: "We are going to have to talk about it and see what we do. Nothing has been agreed in government."Asked whether Lib Dems would vote with Labour against the royal charter proposals on Monday, the source said: "We are going to have to talk about it and see what we do. Nothing has been agreed in government."
Challenged at a press conference on Thursday morning to justify his decision to the victims of phone hacking and other forms of press intrusion, Cameron admitted his proposal was not perfect but argued that it would be the toughest regulation of the press this country has ever seen, and would avoid further delay.Challenged at a press conference on Thursday morning to justify his decision to the victims of phone hacking and other forms of press intrusion, Cameron admitted his proposal was not perfect but argued that it would be the toughest regulation of the press this country has ever seen, and would avoid further delay.
"The right way is the fastest possible way to set up a statutory regulatory body that Leveson proposed," said Cameron. "The deal is there to be done. It's the fastest way to get the justice for victims.""The right way is the fastest possible way to set up a statutory regulatory body that Leveson proposed," said Cameron. "The deal is there to be done. It's the fastest way to get the justice for victims."
The prime minister was also repeatedly accused of choosing newspaper owners over the victims of press intrusion.The prime minister was also repeatedly accused of choosing newspaper owners over the victims of press intrusion.
"There has had to be compromise on all sides," he replied, citing press opposition to £1m maximum fines. "This is not about doing what the press want. This is about having a set of rules that work.""There has had to be compromise on all sides," he replied, citing press opposition to £1m maximum fines. "This is not about doing what the press want. This is about having a set of rules that work."
Tory MPs will be whipped to vote for the prime minister, but there was no immediate response from the Liberal Democrats as to whether they would vote against the government motion. If they do, despite likely votes with the government from some on the Labour benches, Cameron said he would accept the defeat. "The House of Commons will be sovereign and will decide," he said.Tory MPs will be whipped to vote for the prime minister, but there was no immediate response from the Liberal Democrats as to whether they would vote against the government motion. If they do, despite likely votes with the government from some on the Labour benches, Cameron said he would accept the defeat. "The House of Commons will be sovereign and will decide," he said.
Asked if he would kill off statutory regulation, the prime minister said: "I don't believe in a full-bore, full-on legislative solution. If that was put in place I'd want to replace that, if I was re-elected, with a royal charter solution."Asked if he would kill off statutory regulation, the prime minister said: "I don't believe in a full-bore, full-on legislative solution. If that was put in place I'd want to replace that, if I was re-elected, with a royal charter solution."
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.