This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/16/phil-spector-film-doubts-murder-verdict

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
Anger as film casts doubt on Phil Spector murder verdict Anger as film casts doubt on Phil Spector murder verdict
(4 months later)
Four years ago the Wall of Sound music producer Phil Spector was convicted of murdering B-movie actress Lana Clarkson at his Los Angeles castle home. Many believe Clarkson's death was a tragedy waiting to happen – Spector was well known for terrorising women, and musicians, with guns – but the guilty verdict was a surprise in a town where celebrities with far stronger evidence against them typically walk free.Four years ago the Wall of Sound music producer Phil Spector was convicted of murdering B-movie actress Lana Clarkson at his Los Angeles castle home. Many believe Clarkson's death was a tragedy waiting to happen – Spector was well known for terrorising women, and musicians, with guns – but the guilty verdict was a surprise in a town where celebrities with far stronger evidence against them typically walk free.
Now a new HBO-produced film to be broadcast next Sunday, Phil Spector, has sparked a row between victims' rights groups and those, like the film-makers, who believe the evidence against the producer did not rise to the threshold of "beyond reasonable doubt".Now a new HBO-produced film to be broadcast next Sunday, Phil Spector, has sparked a row between victims' rights groups and those, like the film-makers, who believe the evidence against the producer did not rise to the threshold of "beyond reasonable doubt".
Al Pacino, who stars as Spector, has revealed that, while he was undecided about Spector's guilt, David Mamet, the movie's writer and director, was certain of his innocence. Helen Mirren stars as Linda Kenney Baden, Spector's lawyer in the first of his two trials for Clarkson's murder in 2003. He was accused of putting a gun in her mouth and shooting her dead.Al Pacino, who stars as Spector, has revealed that, while he was undecided about Spector's guilt, David Mamet, the movie's writer and director, was certain of his innocence. Helen Mirren stars as Linda Kenney Baden, Spector's lawyer in the first of his two trials for Clarkson's murder in 2003. He was accused of putting a gun in her mouth and shooting her dead.
Spector's wife, 32-year-old Rachelle Spector, told the Observer she believes that the film, despite leaning towards the conclusion that Spector was wrongly convicted, is a breach of client-attorney confidentiality between Spector, 73, and Kenney Baden, who was an adviser to HBO. She fears it will serve to further cement her husband's reputation as a "freak and a megalomaniac" – "a minotaur" who imprisoned people in his castle.Spector's wife, 32-year-old Rachelle Spector, told the Observer she believes that the film, despite leaning towards the conclusion that Spector was wrongly convicted, is a breach of client-attorney confidentiality between Spector, 73, and Kenney Baden, who was an adviser to HBO. She fears it will serve to further cement her husband's reputation as a "freak and a megalomaniac" – "a minotaur" who imprisoned people in his castle.
"My husband is not this fictionalised monster," said the singer-songwriter. "They didn't get OJ Simpson or Robert Blake or Michael Jackson, so they had to get somebody and they spent $30m to get my husband. They hadn't convicted a celebrity in 40 years, so the pressure was on.""My husband is not this fictionalised monster," said the singer-songwriter. "They didn't get OJ Simpson or Robert Blake or Michael Jackson, so they had to get somebody and they spent $30m to get my husband. They hadn't convicted a celebrity in 40 years, so the pressure was on."
HBO says it did not ask Kenney Baden to break privilege, and
from the inception of "our relationship she was steadfast in insisting
that she maintain that privilege."
HBO says it did not ask Kenney Baden to break privilege, and
from the inception of "our relationship she was steadfast in insisting
that she maintain that privilege."
Rachelle's efforts to clear her husband's name are an uphill struggle. His case is on final appeal on procedural grounds, but there is no clear path toward a judicial review on the basis of new evidence or faulty testimony.Rachelle's efforts to clear her husband's name are an uphill struggle. His case is on final appeal on procedural grounds, but there is no clear path toward a judicial review on the basis of new evidence or faulty testimony.
Despite her doubts about the film, Mamet may yet prove to be Rachelle Spector's best ally. Vikram Jayanti, maker of the BBC Arena documentary The Agony and Ecstasy of Phil Spector, who was also a consultant on the HBO film, and Kenney Baden both say the judge in Spector's trial had refused to admit evidence that would have shown he could not have killed her.Despite her doubts about the film, Mamet may yet prove to be Rachelle Spector's best ally. Vikram Jayanti, maker of the BBC Arena documentary The Agony and Ecstasy of Phil Spector, who was also a consultant on the HBO film, and Kenney Baden both say the judge in Spector's trial had refused to admit evidence that would have shown he could not have killed her.
The producer's supporters claim the lack of blood spatter on the white jacket he was wearing proves he could not have been near her. They say judge Larry Fidler was so determined to avoid the trial turning into an OJ Simpson-style circus, he excluded evidence that would have freed Spector.The producer's supporters claim the lack of blood spatter on the white jacket he was wearing proves he could not have been near her. They say judge Larry Fidler was so determined to avoid the trial turning into an OJ Simpson-style circus, he excluded evidence that would have freed Spector.
Spector's eccentricity is the issue that lies at the heart of Mamet's drama. "Do we convict people because of how they look, what they look like, whether they're freaky-looking? Or do we convict people on the evidence?" Kenney Baden asked on CNN last week.Spector's eccentricity is the issue that lies at the heart of Mamet's drama. "Do we convict people because of how they look, what they look like, whether they're freaky-looking? Or do we convict people on the evidence?" Kenney Baden asked on CNN last week.
But supporters of the murdered actress say that they are ready to take their protest to voters during award season if, as they suspect it will, the film makes a case for Spector's innocence.But supporters of the murdered actress say that they are ready to take their protest to voters during award season if, as they suspect it will, the film makes a case for Spector's innocence.
"Mamet, the writer, has publicly stated that he feels Phil Spector is innocent and should not be in prison," says spokesman Ed Lozzi. "We fear that he will rewrite history and portray Lana Clarkson as responsible for her own death. That is not acceptable, and if he does so, there will be consequences from us.""Mamet, the writer, has publicly stated that he feels Phil Spector is innocent and should not be in prison," says spokesman Ed Lozzi. "We fear that he will rewrite history and portray Lana Clarkson as responsible for her own death. That is not acceptable, and if he does so, there will be consequences from us."
Mamet has said he's interested in the "mythological possibilities" in the case — the perfect "Hollywood Babylon" story of an ageing, eccentric musical genius crossing paths in a bar with a struggling, fame-struck woman.Mamet has said he's interested in the "mythological possibilities" in the case — the perfect "Hollywood Babylon" story of an ageing, eccentric musical genius crossing paths in a bar with a struggling, fame-struck woman.
Jayanti said that despite Spector's evident oddness – "I felt he was endlessly surprised that people thought he was odd" – he believes "audiences for my film came in hating Phil Spector and thinking he was a murderer but left with a reasonable doubt". Mamet's film will do that on a much larger scale, he predicts. "Perhaps it will help perform a kind of cultural transformation. People will ask, was it a fair trial? Let's take another look at what happened that night."Jayanti said that despite Spector's evident oddness – "I felt he was endlessly surprised that people thought he was odd" – he believes "audiences for my film came in hating Phil Spector and thinking he was a murderer but left with a reasonable doubt". Mamet's film will do that on a much larger scale, he predicts. "Perhaps it will help perform a kind of cultural transformation. People will ask, was it a fair trial? Let's take another look at what happened that night."
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox every weekday.