This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21825823

The article has changed 25 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 11 Version 12
Press regulation deal struck by parties - Labour Press regulation deal struck by parties - Labour
(35 minutes later)
A deal has been struck between the three main political parties on measures to regulate the press, Labour has said.A deal has been struck between the three main political parties on measures to regulate the press, Labour has said.
Leader Ed Miliband said the deal would protect "future victims" of press intrusion, while maintaining a free press.Leader Ed Miliband said the deal would protect "future victims" of press intrusion, while maintaining a free press.
An overhaul of press regulation began after it was revealed that journalists had hacked thousands of phones.An overhaul of press regulation began after it was revealed that journalists had hacked thousands of phones.
But Tory Maria Miller said leaders still needed to discuss details.But Tory Maria Miller said leaders still needed to discuss details.
Lord Justice Leveson's inquiry into press ethics in the wake of the phone-hacking scandal called for a new, independent regulator backed by legislation, which prompted months of political wrangling.Lord Justice Leveson's inquiry into press ethics in the wake of the phone-hacking scandal called for a new, independent regulator backed by legislation, which prompted months of political wrangling.
The Liberal Democrats and Labour wanted a royal charter backed by legislation to establish the regulator, while Prime Minister David Cameron supported a royal charter without a law.The Liberal Democrats and Labour wanted a royal charter backed by legislation to establish the regulator, while Prime Minister David Cameron supported a royal charter without a law.
A Commons debate and vote were scheduled for Monday, but after overnight talks between the Lib Dem and Labour leaders and a senior Tory minister resulted in a deal, the vote was cancelled. A statement from the prime minister is expected in the Commons later.A Commons debate and vote were scheduled for Monday, but after overnight talks between the Lib Dem and Labour leaders and a senior Tory minister resulted in a deal, the vote was cancelled. A statement from the prime minister is expected in the Commons later.
The regulator is likely to be able to force a newspaper to issue corrections and apologies, and could also have the power to impose fines.
Describing the regulator as having teeth to punish, Mr Miliband said: "A free press has nothing to fear from what has been agreed".Describing the regulator as having teeth to punish, Mr Miliband said: "A free press has nothing to fear from what has been agreed".
The deal sets out that an independent regulator of the press will be established by royal charter, but both sides have differed in their interpretation of what the deal involves.The deal sets out that an independent regulator of the press will be established by royal charter, but both sides have differed in their interpretation of what the deal involves.
Mr Miliband said the royal charter published by Mr Clegg and himself last week "would be underpinned by statute". Mr Miliband said the royal charter "would be underpinned by statute".
He said this was important because "it stops ministers or the press meddling with it, or watering it down in the future."He said this was important because "it stops ministers or the press meddling with it, or watering it down in the future."
However, Culture Secretary Maria Miller said: "This is not a statutory underpinning, it is simply making sure that there's no change. It's a no-change clause." However, Mr Cameron and the Culture secretary, Maria Miller, both said there was no statutory underpinning.
The BBC's Nick Robinson said Labour and the Lib Dems appeared to have accepted a watered-down version of their demands for full legal underpinning of a royal charter establishing a new watchdog. "What we wanted to avoid, and we have avoided, is a press law," Mr Cameron said.
Details still have to be worked out, with Ms Miller saying: "We're very close to a deal. What has been accepted by all the main parties is that the prime minister's royal charter should go ahead, and more importantly we've stopped Labour's extreme version of the press law." "Nowhere will it say what this body is, what it does, what it can't do, what the press can and can't do. That, quiet rightly, is being kept out of Parliament. So, no statutory underpinning but a safeguard that says politicians can't in future fiddle with this arrangement."
She added: "It's important that we get the details right, and there needs to be a conversation between the leaders, and I think that will go ahead this morning." Details still have to be worked out, with Ms Miller saying: "It's important that we get the details right, and there needs to be a conversation between the leaders, and I think that will go ahead this morning."
Ms Harman, who told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that there was an agreement, explained that "a small piece of legislation" in the enterprise and regulatory reform bill would be tabled in the Lords later. Mr Clegg said he had worked "flat out" to get the deal, and was "delighted" with the cross-party agreement.
This clause would give power in law to any royal charter that states that a two-thirds majority of both houses of Parliament is needed to amend it. "We've secured the cherished principle of freedom of the press, which is incredibly important in our democracy, but also given innocent people the reassurance that we won't be unjustifiably bullied or intimidated by powerful interests in the press without having proper recourse when that happens."
It would not mention any specific charter, Leveson or the press - but the royal charter on press regulation would itself state that it cannot be amended without a two-thirds majority of Parliament, being the only charter to do so. Labour's Harriet Harman explained that "a small piece of legislation" in the enterprise and regulatory reform bill would be tabled in the Lords later.
Nick Robinson said the press had been informed over the days and months of wrangling, with key players being Telegraph's Lord Black, Associated Newspapers' Peter Wright, the editor of the Times John Witherow and the editor of the FT Lionel Barber, he says. A member of campaign group Hacked Off was thought to be at the overnight talks. The clause states that a royal charter cannot be changed unless it meets requirements stated within specific charters for amendments.
It does not mention any specific charter, Leveson or the press - but the royal charter on press regulation would itself state that it cannot be amended without a two-thirds majority of Parliament.
Nick Robinson said the press had been informed over the days and months of wrangling, with key players being Telegraph's Lord Black, Associated Newspapers' Peter Wright, the editor of the Times John Witherow and the editor of the FT Lionel Barber.
Evan Harris of campaign group Hacked Off was at the overnight talks, with three other members. The group tweeted: "We're encouraged by the progress of the talks but questions remain over the incentives that get papers to join the new regulator."
But reacting to news of a political deal, one newspaper industry source told the BBC they were "instinctively uncomfortable" with it.But reacting to news of a political deal, one newspaper industry source told the BBC they were "instinctively uncomfortable" with it.
The source noted that there was no compulsion for the papers to be involved in the new system - they could carry on setting up a new regulator but decide that the regulator should not apply for official recognition. The source noted that there was no compulsion for the papers to be involved in the new system - they could carry on setting up a new regulator to replace the much-criticised Press Complaints Commission but decide that the regulator should not apply for official recognition.
The industry's proposed independent body would be able to fine those who breached its standards - up to £1m - and award compensation to victims. The industry has a proposed independent body of its own, which would be able to fine those who breached its standards - up to £1m - and award compensation to victims.
There would be an investigative arm, to look into serious wrongdoing by papers, and legally enforceable contracts, to bind publishers into the new system and ensure funding.There would be an investigative arm, to look into serious wrongdoing by papers, and legally enforceable contracts, to bind publishers into the new system and ensure funding.
The press industry's existing self-regulation body, the Press Complaints Commission, has already moved into a "transitional phase" while a long-term replacement can be established.
It currently upholds its own editors' code of practice, and judges complaints about newspapers and magazines against the code.