This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-21867123

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
'Fire alarm' warning for hospital patient death rates Wales hospital death rates: NHS 'fire alarm' warning
(35 minutes later)
Eleven out of 17 district general hospitals in Wales have higher death rates than should be expected, according to statistics published by the Welsh government.Eleven out of 17 district general hospitals in Wales have higher death rates than should be expected, according to statistics published by the Welsh government.
Officials described the findings as a "fire alarm".Officials described the findings as a "fire alarm".
But they warned there were major problems with the way the data is collected. But they warned that there are major problems with the way the data is collected.
The statistics are part of a drive to make the NHS more transparent in the wake of the Stafford Hospital scandal.The statistics are part of a drive to make the NHS more transparent in the wake of the Stafford Hospital scandal.
Neglect and abuse at Stafford hospital led to hundreds of unnecessary deaths between 2005 and 2008 and prompted a public inquiry. Neglect and abuse at Stafford Hospital led to hundreds of unnecessary deaths between 2005 and 2008 and prompted a public inquiry.
During the most recent period recorded, five out of six local health boards in Wales had higher scores than should be expected under the NHS's system to measure mortality rates. While officials called the Risk Adjusted Mortality Index (Rami) a "fire alarm", they warned that problems gathering the data made it difficult to interpret the figures.
Officials described the Risk Adjusted Mortality Index (Rami) as a "fire alarm", but they warned that problems gathering the data made it difficult to interpret the figures. Data is collected across the UK and a score of 100 is considered normal. When an NHS organisation scores more than 100 it could be an indicator that the number of patients who are dying is higher than should be expected.
Data is collected across the UK. During the most recent period recorded, five out of six local health boards in Wales had scores higher than 100.
A score of 100 is considered normal. When an NHS organisation scores more than 100 it could be an indicator that the number of patients who are dying is higher than should be expected. However, officials warned that higher scores may be due to problems gathering data, rather than lapses in the quality of patient care.
However, officials warned higher scores may be due to problems gathering data, rather than lapses in the quality of patient care.
The Rami takes into account other factors about patients, including their underlying health, social factors and their lifestyles.The Rami takes into account other factors about patients, including their underlying health, social factors and their lifestyles.
The way the data is collected is known as coding.The way the data is collected is known as coding.
Welsh government officials say that coding in Welsh hospitals has not been as good as in the English NHS.Welsh government officials say that coding in Welsh hospitals has not been as good as in the English NHS.
Annual adjustments
Other annual adjustments to the index make it difficult to compare mortality rates from year to year.Other annual adjustments to the index make it difficult to compare mortality rates from year to year.
The Welsh government uses Rami scores as one way of measuring performance in the NHS.
However, it says Rami cannot be looked at in isolation and that reviewing case notes after a patient dies is a better way to find out whether improvements to care are needed.
Ministers committed to making more information available as part of their response to the public inquiry into Stafford Hospital.
Grant Robinson, medical director for Aneurin Bevan Local Health Board, said the inconsistencies in coding made it difficult to turn the index into a league table.
But he added: "Anyone who says this is just coding would be missing an important opportunity to improve care."
He said: "It's important to look underneath the numbers and see what's really going on
"We've compared this to a fire alarm. So what you have to do is go see if there is a fire and the best way to do that is to look inside your hospital, get on the ground, see what's happening to patients, and also see what did happen to patients who've died to see if it could have been done better.
"The statistics we have got are acting as fire alarms, so yes there's the sound of an alarm ringing.
'Need to be very alert'
"What we need to know is where the fires are and we need to be very alert and get on top of that when it happens quickly."
Health Minister Mark Drakeford said: "The Welsh government is committed to transparency on performance and to improving access to NHS information.Health Minister Mark Drakeford said: "The Welsh government is committed to transparency on performance and to improving access to NHS information.
"As from today, anyone in Wales can view a measure of hospital mortality data on local health board and Welsh government websites.""As from today, anyone in Wales can view a measure of hospital mortality data on local health board and Welsh government websites."
The most recent data available is for the period September 2011 to October 2012.
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, which had a Rami score of 116, said it had a backlog of 40,000 patient episodes which have not yet been coded.
The University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff - Wales' biggest hospital - had the highest Rami score of 128.
The lowest were University Hospital Llandough, on the outskirts of Cardiff, and Nevill Hall Hospital, in Abergavenny, at 86.
Welsh government deputy chief medical officer Chris Jones said: "The need to improve the timeliness and accuracy of data collection is well understood by chief executives and their boards. Health boards have plans in place to meet the standards required."