This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/mar/29/andrew-mitchell-writ-sun-plebgate

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Andrew Mitchell issues libel writ against Sun over 'plebgate' Andrew Mitchell issues libel writ against Sun over 'plebgate'
(6 months later)
Former cabinet minister Andrew Mitchell is taking legal action against the Sun over its reporting of his verbal altercation with police officers in Downing Street.Former cabinet minister Andrew Mitchell is taking legal action against the Sun over its reporting of his verbal altercation with police officers in Downing Street.
Mitchell admitted there was an ill-tempered exchange with officers and quit the cabinet but insists he did not use the words attributed to him – that he called officers "plebs" – and says he was the victim of a deliberate campaign to "toxify" the Tories and ruin his career.Mitchell admitted there was an ill-tempered exchange with officers and quit the cabinet but insists he did not use the words attributed to him – that he called officers "plebs" – and says he was the victim of a deliberate campaign to "toxify" the Tories and ruin his career.
He confirmed on Thursday night that his lawyers had issued a libel writ against the Sun, which first ran the story, as he continued a fightback.He confirmed on Thursday night that his lawyers had issued a libel writ against the Sun, which first ran the story, as he continued a fightback.
A friend of Mitchell said the MP had been subjected to a "campaign of vilification".A friend of Mitchell said the MP had been subjected to a "campaign of vilification".
A spokesman for the newspaper said it stood by its story "and will defend this claim vigorously".A spokesman for the newspaper said it stood by its story "and will defend this claim vigorously".
The Crown Prosecution Service also confirmed on Thursday night that it had received "initial papers" from Scotland Yard in relation to the investigation, which was sparked by claims the then chief whip called officers "plebs" and swore at them repeatedly after being told he could not ride his bicycle through the gates of Downing Street.The Crown Prosecution Service also confirmed on Thursday night that it had received "initial papers" from Scotland Yard in relation to the investigation, which was sparked by claims the then chief whip called officers "plebs" and swore at them repeatedly after being told he could not ride his bicycle through the gates of Downing Street.
So far, three officers have been arrested as part of the investigation sparked by the row about the incident on 19 September.So far, three officers have been arrested as part of the investigation sparked by the row about the incident on 19 September.
Those arrested include a 52-year-old from the Diplomatic Protection Group (DPG) who was held on 15 December on suspicion of misconduct in public office and bailed until April.Those arrested include a 52-year-old from the Diplomatic Protection Group (DPG) who was held on 15 December on suspicion of misconduct in public office and bailed until April.
Two 46-year-olds from the same command were held on 31 January and 1 February for allegedly passing information to the media and were bailed until May.Two 46-year-olds from the same command were held on 31 January and 1 February for allegedly passing information to the media and were bailed until May.
All three remain suspended. A 23-year-old man who does not work for the police was also arrested and bailed until May.All three remain suspended. A 23-year-old man who does not work for the police was also arrested and bailed until May.
A CPS spokesman said: "We have received initial papers but we have not received a full file of evidence and we now await the conclusion of the police investigation before considering charges."A CPS spokesman said: "We have received initial papers but we have not received a full file of evidence and we now await the conclusion of the police investigation before considering charges."
An email from a civilian witness backing up the police account of events has also since been called into question.An email from a civilian witness backing up the police account of events has also since been called into question.
Some 30 detectives have taken statements from all 800 officers in the DPG, which is tasked with protecting government officials.Some 30 detectives have taken statements from all 800 officers in the DPG, which is tasked with protecting government officials.
Scotland Yard is currently trying to find out how the Sun and Daily Telegraph obtained information about the "plebgate" row and if it came from police.Scotland Yard is currently trying to find out how the Sun and Daily Telegraph obtained information about the "plebgate" row and if it came from police.
It is also looking at a police officer's claim to have witnessed the altercation between Mitchell and officers in Downing Street, and allegations by Mitchell that police had lied in a log dated 19 September 2012.It is also looking at a police officer's claim to have witnessed the altercation between Mitchell and officers in Downing Street, and allegations by Mitchell that police had lied in a log dated 19 September 2012.
Pressure on Mitchell intensified when the Daily Telegraph published the log.Pressure on Mitchell intensified when the Daily Telegraph published the log.
Mitchell's lawyer Graham Atkins indicated that further legal action could follow.Mitchell's lawyer Graham Atkins indicated that further legal action could follow.
"I can confirm that I recently issued proceedings for libel against the owners of the Sun on behalf of Andrew Mitchell MP," he said."I can confirm that I recently issued proceedings for libel against the owners of the Sun on behalf of Andrew Mitchell MP," he said.
"There are a number of other potential actions being considered but I do not intend commenting any further at this stage.""There are a number of other potential actions being considered but I do not intend commenting any further at this stage."
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.