This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-21985441

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Teachers oppose 'narrow' curriculum Teachers oppose 'narrow' curriculum
(about 13 hours later)
The revised national curriculum for schools in England is narrow and outdated, according to a motion to be debated at the National Union of Teachers’ conference. The revised national curriculum for schools in England is so narrow it will deter young people from learning, according to the National Union of Teachers' conference.
Teachers will argue against a simplistic “kings and queens” version of subjects such as history. Delegates attacked it as "Gove's pub quiz curriculum", a reference to the Education Secretary, Michael Gove.
They claim that it will fail to engage pupils and risks increasing numbers missing school. The NUT's general secretary Christine Blower said the curriculum was "desperately ill thought out".
The Department for Education said the curriculum “embodies high expectations”. The Department for Education said it "embodies high expectations".
The NUT’s annual conference in Liverpool will hear claims that the new version of the curriculum “represents a reactionary step backwards”. The NUT, holding its annual conference in Liverpool, heard strong criticism of the planned new curriculum.
'Step backwards' 'Kings and queens'
It accuses the government of using international evidence in a way that is “misleading and selective”. Delegates claimed that its emphasis on core knowledge was a throw-back to rote learning and uncreative lists of facts.
Teachers will say that there is an over-emphasis on core subjects and the idea of “hard facts” rather than creativity. Alex Kenny from the union's executive said it was a curriculum based on pub-quiz style chunks of information.
It says that the curriculum for maths is overly-prescriptive with too narrow a focus and that geography is reduced to a list of “capes, bays, rivers and mountain ranges”. "It's a curriculum in which the learner is completely absent, or just a passive consumer of information or knowledge," he said.
For English, it says there is an “obsession with particular literary texts”. The conference backed a motion attacking the curriculum for presenting a simplistic, culturally narrow, "kings and queens" version of subjects such as history.
The conference will also ask why this new curriculum does not apply to academies and free schools. It says that the curriculum for maths is over-prescriptive with too narrow a focus and that geography is reduced to a list of "capes, bays, rivers and mountain ranges".
A Department for Education spokesman rejected the criticism, saying: "This could not be further from the truth. For English, it says there is an "obsession with particular literary texts".
There were particular concerns that it would fail to engage with children who spoke English as a second language and pupils with special needs.
Martin Allen, a delegate from Ealing, described it as a "know your place curriculum", based on rote learning and "social control".
"Teachers are genuinely fearful that pupils will be forced to learn in a way that is inappropriate," said Ms Blower.
"Rote learning is the antithesis of experiential learning, learning through doing. It doesn't promote the critical thinking and problem-solving skills that are essential for good quality learning."
'Challenging and ambitious'
But the debate also heard support for the idea of teaching a core of knowledge.
Quentin Deakin from Bradford warned that in history pupils could be left "rudderless without some chronology".
The NUT published a survey of more than 2,000 members of the union showing widespread opposition to the curriculum.
It found that two-thirds of teachers believed there was "too much emphasis on 'facts' rather than skills". Fewer than one in 10 believed the changes would give teachers more freedom.
A Department for Education spokesman rejected the criticisms of the planned curriculum: "This could not be further from the truth.
"The draft national curriculum is challenging and ambitious and will give every child the broad and balanced education they need to fulfil their potential."The draft national curriculum is challenging and ambitious and will give every child the broad and balanced education they need to fulfil their potential.
"We engaged with academics and experts and carefully analysed the world's most successful school systems before building a curriculum which embodies high expectations."We engaged with academics and experts and carefully analysed the world's most successful school systems before building a curriculum which embodies high expectations.
"Furthermore we are giving every school more freedom and trusting teachers to use their creativity to shape the curriculum to the needs of their pupils.""Furthermore we are giving every school more freedom and trusting teachers to use their creativity to shape the curriculum to the needs of their pupils."