This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/apr/10/american-apparel-ad-banned
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
American Apparel ads banned for using overtly sexual images | American Apparel ads banned for using overtly sexual images |
(34 minutes later) | |
American Apparel has reinforced its reputation for paying scant regard to advertising regulations, with yet another ban for overtly sexual images that were judged to demean women on its website. | |
The controversial US retailer, which has regularly broken advertising rules by using exploitative images of young women, featured a string of images of two women on the "advertising" page of the company website. | The controversial US retailer, which has regularly broken advertising rules by using exploitative images of young women, featured a string of images of two women on the "advertising" page of the company website. |
The Advertising Standards Authority received complaints that the two models were shown in vulnerable positions, and that the images were offensive, overtly sexual and objectified women. | The Advertising Standards Authority received complaints that the two models were shown in vulnerable positions, and that the images were offensive, overtly sexual and objectified women. |
American Apparel UK said it "did [its] best to abide by the standards of the industry" – despite having ads banned three times in just over four months – "as well as creating authentic, honest and memorable images relevant to their customer base". | |
The ASA said the images of the scantily clad women were "gratuitous" and "overtly sexual". | The ASA said the images of the scantily clad women were "gratuitous" and "overtly sexual". |
Of a series of six images of one of the models, the ASA said: "We considered the images were overtly sexual and that they demeaned women by emphasising the model's groin, buttocks and breasts and by not including her face." | Of a series of six images of one of the models, the ASA said: "We considered the images were overtly sexual and that they demeaned women by emphasising the model's groin, buttocks and breasts and by not including her face." |
Of the image of the second model, the ASA said: "We considered the image to be gratuitous, particularly in an ad for knitwear." | Of the image of the second model, the ASA said: "We considered the image to be gratuitous, particularly in an ad for knitwear." |
The regulator said that there was a "voyeuristic quality to the images, which served to heighten the impression that the women were vulnerable and in sexually provocative poses". | The regulator said that there was a "voyeuristic quality to the images, which served to heighten the impression that the women were vulnerable and in sexually provocative poses". |
The ASA banned the campaign for breaching the advertising code under harm and offence rules. | The ASA banned the campaign for breaching the advertising code under harm and offence rules. |
"We considered the ads were likely to cause serious offence to visitors to American Apparel's website," it said. "The ads must not appear again in their current form." | |
• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly "for publication". | • To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly "for publication". |
• To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook | • To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook |