This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-22279857

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Catholic midwives win appeal over abortion case Catholic midwives win appeal over abortion case
(35 minutes later)
Two Roman Catholic midwives have won a legal battle to avoid taking any part in abortion procedures.Two Roman Catholic midwives have won a legal battle to avoid taking any part in abortion procedures.
Mary Doogan, 58, and Concepta Wood, 52, lost a previous case against NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GGC).Mary Doogan, 58, and Concepta Wood, 52, lost a previous case against NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GGC).
The court ruled that their human rights had not been violated as they were not directly involved in terminations.The court ruled that their human rights had not been violated as they were not directly involved in terminations.
Appeal judges have now ruled their right to conscientious objection means they can refuse to delegate, supervise or support staff involved in abortions.Appeal judges have now ruled their right to conscientious objection means they can refuse to delegate, supervise or support staff involved in abortions.
Ms Doogan, from Garrowhill in Glasgow, and Mrs Wood, from Clarkston in East Renfrewshire, were employed as labour ward co-ordinators at the Southern General Hospital in Glasgow.Ms Doogan, from Garrowhill in Glasgow, and Mrs Wood, from Clarkston in East Renfrewshire, were employed as labour ward co-ordinators at the Southern General Hospital in Glasgow.
Judicial reviewJudicial review
The midwifery sisters have a right of conscientious objection - recognised in the 1967 Abortion Act - and challenged whether the health board - NHS GGC - was entitled to require them to delegate, supervise and support staff in the work. The midwifery sisters have a right of conscientious objection, which is recognised in the 1967 Abortion Act.
They challenged whether the health board, NHS GGC, was entitled to require them to delegate, supervise and support staff in the work.
Following a judicial review in February last year at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, judge Lady Smith ruled against the women.Following a judicial review in February last year at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, judge Lady Smith ruled against the women.
Lady Smith said: "Nothing they have to do as part of their duties terminates a woman's pregnancy.Lady Smith said: "Nothing they have to do as part of their duties terminates a woman's pregnancy.
"They are sufficiently removed from direct involvement as, it seems to me, to afford appropriate respect for and accommodation of their beliefs.""They are sufficiently removed from direct involvement as, it seems to me, to afford appropriate respect for and accommodation of their beliefs."
Following the judgement, the women launched an appeal.Following the judgement, the women launched an appeal.
Their counsel Gerry Moynihan QC told the court that in so far as the women were part of a team, their right to conscientious objection extended to the whole of their duties, save for the provision that there was an obligation to participate in life-saving measures.Their counsel Gerry Moynihan QC told the court that in so far as the women were part of a team, their right to conscientious objection extended to the whole of their duties, save for the provision that there was an obligation to participate in life-saving measures.
He said there was clear legal authority that the right to conscientious objection was intended to apply to the whole team whose involvement was necessary to achieve the procedure.He said there was clear legal authority that the right to conscientious objection was intended to apply to the whole team whose involvement was necessary to achieve the procedure.
Mr Moynihan said that because the midwives let the administration know of their objection in advance, the health board could manage its staff as a whole to respect their right to conscientious objection.Mr Moynihan said that because the midwives let the administration know of their objection in advance, the health board could manage its staff as a whole to respect their right to conscientious objection.
"The administrative convenience of the health board is irrelevant because the right is a balance between facilitating abortion while respecting the genuine conscientious objection of medical, nursing and ancillary staff," he said."The administrative convenience of the health board is irrelevant because the right is a balance between facilitating abortion while respecting the genuine conscientious objection of medical, nursing and ancillary staff," he said.
Mr Moynihan told the court that the woman said there were "work around arrangements" to cover their objections prior to 2007. Mr Moynihan told the court that the woman said there were "work-around arrangements" to cover their objections prior to 2007.
'Dividing line''Dividing line'
He argued that "the dividing line" over what was exempt ought to be an individual's conscience and not a bureaucrat saying that was not in the literal meaning of participation.He argued that "the dividing line" over what was exempt ought to be an individual's conscience and not a bureaucrat saying that was not in the literal meaning of participation.
Brian Napier QC, for NHS GGC, told the appeal judges that having responsibility of a managerial, supervisory or support nature did not of itself trigger the right to conscientious objection.Brian Napier QC, for NHS GGC, told the appeal judges that having responsibility of a managerial, supervisory or support nature did not of itself trigger the right to conscientious objection.
Lady Dorrian, sitting with Lord Mackay of Drumadoon and Lord McEwan, issued a ruling on Wednesday, backing the midwives.Lady Dorrian, sitting with Lord Mackay of Drumadoon and Lord McEwan, issued a ruling on Wednesday, backing the midwives.
The ruling said: "In our view the right of conscientious objection extends not only to the actual medical or surgical termination but to the whole process of treatment given for that purpose."The ruling said: "In our view the right of conscientious objection extends not only to the actual medical or surgical termination but to the whole process of treatment given for that purpose."