This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22294722

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Leveson report: Newspapers reject press royal charter Leveson report: Newspapers reject press regulation plans
(35 minutes later)
The newspaper industry rejects cross-party press regulation plans, and publishes its own proposals for self-regulation backed by royal charter. A number of newspapers are to publish a proposal for self-regulation backed by royal charter, after rejecting plans drawn up by the main political parties.
The three main political parties agreed to a royal charter last month in response to Lord Justice Leveson's report on press standards and ethics. The government and Labour Party agreed to a royal charter last month in response to Lord Justice Leveson's report on press standards and ethics.
They said an independent watchdog would be set up by royal charter with powers to issue fines and demand apologies.They said an independent watchdog would be set up by royal charter with powers to issue fines and demand apologies.
But newspapers argue that they had no say in the final discussions.But newspapers argue that they had no say in the final discussions.
According to a statement released by the Newspaper Society on behalf of the national and local newspaper industry, the industry said the royal charter published by the government on 18 March had been condemned by a "range of international media freedom organisations" and enjoys "no support within the press" in the UK. According to a statement released by the Newspaper Society on behalf of a number of national and local newspapers, they said the royal charter published by the government on 18 March had been condemned by a "range of international media freedom organisations" and enjoys "no support within the press" in the UK.
"A number of its recommendations are unworkable and it gives politicians an unacceptable degree of interference in the regulation of the press," warned the statement."A number of its recommendations are unworkable and it gives politicians an unacceptable degree of interference in the regulation of the press," warned the statement.
'Widespread backing''Widespread backing'
The industry's proposal is closely based on the draft royal charter published on 12 February following negotiations with national and local newspapers and magazines.The industry's proposal is closely based on the draft royal charter published on 12 February following negotiations with national and local newspapers and magazines.
The newspaper's alternative charter takes away powers from Parliament to block or approve future changes to regulation.The newspaper's alternative charter takes away powers from Parliament to block or approve future changes to regulation.
Instead the regulator, trade bodies and a "recognition panel" would need to agree to changes. Instead the regulator, trade bodies and a newly-created "recognition panel" would need to agree to changes.
It removes a ban on former editors sitting on the recognition panel, which would recognise a regulator and requires at least one board member to have experience of the newspaper industry. The chair and members of the new panel would be selected by an appointments committee chaired by a retired Supreme Court judge, and including one representative of the industry's interests, one member representing the public interest and one public appointments assessor nominated by the Commissioner for Public Appointments for England and Wales.
It would also be more difficult to bring group complaints than under the government's system. It would be more difficult to bring group complaints than under the government's system.
There would also be a public consultation on the industry's proposals to allow newspaper and magazine readers to have their say, something not offered by the government's scheme.
The statement described it as "a workable, practical way to swiftly deliver the Leveson recommendations, which the industry accepts, without any form of state-sponsored regulation that would endanger freedom of speech".The statement described it as "a workable, practical way to swiftly deliver the Leveson recommendations, which the industry accepts, without any form of state-sponsored regulation that would endanger freedom of speech".
It said the new proposal has "widespread backing across the industry". It said the new proposal had "widespread backing across the industry".
Those who arranged the response said all national papers apart from the Guardian and Independent were signed up. "This royal charter proposal will deliver on Leveson and bind the UK's national and local newspapers and magazines to a tough and enduring system of regulation - tougher than anywhere else in the Western world - which will be of real benefit to the public, at the same time as protecting freedom of speech," it said.
Those who arranged the statement said all national papers apart from the Guardian and Independent had signed up.
Industry sources told the BBC's political correspondent Ross Hawkins that the new press regulator would not apply for formal recognition under the government's royal charter plans.Industry sources told the BBC's political correspondent Ross Hawkins that the new press regulator would not apply for formal recognition under the government's royal charter plans.
This throws open the post-Leveson debate as politicians cannot force the papers to engage with their plan, our correspondent says.This throws open the post-Leveson debate as politicians cannot force the papers to engage with their plan, our correspondent says.
'Stitch-up''Stitch-up'
Peter Wright, editor emeritus of Associated Newspapers, told the BBC's World at One: "We recognise that the most important thing we have do is get an effective new regulator up and running, and we need to have the support of political parties in this. The clear preference is for a royal charter... that is in line with Leveson regulations." Peter Wright, editor emeritus of Associated Newspapers, told the BBC's World at One: "We recognise that the most important thing we have do is to get an effective new regulator up and running, and we need to have the support of political parties in this.
"The clear preference is for a royal charter... that is in line with Leveson regulations."
He said the press were "deliberately excluded" from the final negotiations on the government's charter and it contained a number of measures that were "unworkable".He said the press were "deliberately excluded" from the final negotiations on the government's charter and it contained a number of measures that were "unworkable".
The press - in particular members of the regional press - did not feel they could sign up to it, he said.The press - in particular members of the regional press - did not feel they could sign up to it, he said.
Tony Gallagher, editor of the Daily Telegraph, tweeted his response: "Can anyone possibly be surprised we have rejected Lab-Lib-Hacked Off stitch up[?]"Tony Gallagher, editor of the Daily Telegraph, tweeted his response: "Can anyone possibly be surprised we have rejected Lab-Lib-Hacked Off stitch up[?]"
The industry statement said the charter would deliver:The industry statement said the charter would deliver:
Lawyers representing the papers said they had formally petitioned the Privy Council, which meets next month, to consider the issue.Lawyers representing the papers said they had formally petitioned the Privy Council, which meets next month, to consider the issue.