This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/07/russia-us-syria-conference

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Russia and US call for Syria conference with both sides Russia and US pledge Syria conference with both sides
(about 1 hour later)
The United States and Russia have pledged to set aside more than two years of differences over Syria's civil war, saying they'd convene an international conference later this month to try to corral President Bashar al-Assad's regime and the rebels into talks on a political transition. Russia and the United States have pledged to convene an international conference aimed at ending the civil war in Syria, hoping to give the situation a new diplomatic push following two years of bloodshed.
Yet even as leaders from both countries hailed their joint strategy as proof of enhanced US-Russian cooperation, it was unclear how their plan might now prove effective in ending a war that has become even more dangerous in recent months, with accusations the Assad regime has used chemical weapons, Israeli air strikes on weapons convoys and American threats to begin arming the rebels. John Kerry, the US secretary of state, and Sergei Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, announced the move at a midnight press conference in the Russian capital. Kerry also met Vladimir Putin during his visit to Moscow.
The outcome of more than five hours of meetings in Moscow involving US secretary of state John Kerry and President Vladimir Putin and foreign minister Sergey Lavrov of Russia essentially brings diplomatic efforts to halt Syria's violence to a point they were about a year ago. The former Cold War foes, who have split bitterly over how to halt the conflict, said they would work to revive a transition plan they laid out in June 2012, yet never gained momentum with Syria's government or the opposition. They said this time they were committed to bringing the Syrian government and rebels to the negotiating table. The announcement of the joint initiative comes after months of stalled co-operation on Syria. Officials from both sides hope that representatives from the regime of Bashar al-Assad and the opposition will attend. Russia remains Assad's staunchest ally and has opposed foreign involvement in the conflict which has killed more than 70,000 people.
Speaking about the US strategy, Kerry suggested the Obama administration would consider holding off on any possible plan to provide weapons to vetted units of the Syrian opposition if a peace strategy takes hold in the coming weeks. Russia has consistently pushed for a diplomatic solution to the crisis while continuing to supply Assad with arms. Barack Obama is facing increasing calls for military intervention following reports of chemical weapons use in Syria. Bob Corker, the ranking member of the Senate foreign relations committee, told CBS on Tuesday that: "I do think we'll be arming the opposition shortly."
That appeared to be a minor concession to Russia, which has argued vehemently against any foreign governments providing military assistance for fear it would aid extremists. Kerry also appeared to back down from the outright US demand that Assad step down in the transition, while maintaining that he, personally, couldn't see how a leader responsible for such widespread abuses could remain in power as part of a peace deal. More than 70,000 people have died in the conflict since March 2011, according to the United Nations. Speaking in Washington during a press conference with the visiting South Korean president, Obama said: "There are continuing re-evaluations about what we do."
Kerry said the international plan for a transition agreed to last year in Geneva must not be a "piece of paper", but rather "the roadmap" for peace. Kerry said at the midnight press conference that the conference would be held "as soon as practical, possibly, hopefully as soon as the end of the month". Falling in line with Russia, he played up the importance of the Geneva communique, agreed last year, which calls for an end to the violence in Syria and the creation of a transitional government that could include members of Assad's regime.
The Geneva plan allowed each side to veto candidates it found unacceptable for an interim government. The plan never got off the ground, though Washington and Moscow differ over the reasons. "Despite different points of view, committed partners can accomplish great things together when the world needs it," Kerry told reporters in Russia's capital. "And this is one of those moments."
Kerry and Lavrov declined to discuss Assad's fate in the early hours of Wednesday.
"We are not interested in the fate of certain persons," Lavrov said. "We are interested in the fate of the total Syrian people."
Asked about the future of Assad, Kerry brushed off the question and said: "I'm not going to decide that tonight."
Speaking to reporters at a government guesthouse in Moscow, Lavrov praised the Assad regime for expressing its willingness to work on a political transition and its decision to establish a dialogue with all Syrians. He said the opposition, by contrast, "hasn't said a single word yet which would show their commitment".Speaking to reporters at a government guesthouse in Moscow, Lavrov praised the Assad regime for expressing its willingness to work on a political transition and its decision to establish a dialogue with all Syrians. He said the opposition, by contrast, "hasn't said a single word yet which would show their commitment".
"When we hear the right words from the opposition, given the fact that the regime has already voiced the right words, then we will try to convert such words into actions," Lavrov said."When we hear the right words from the opposition, given the fact that the regime has already voiced the right words, then we will try to convert such words into actions," Lavrov said.
Kerry took a different view.Kerry took a different view.
He said the alternative to the political transition strategy was more violence, a Syria that "heads increasingly towards an abyss, a worse humanitarian crisis and possibly even ethnic cleansing and the breakup of the Syrian state". He said the opposition supports the peace plan and the transition strategy and that it was up to the government to make good on its obligations, also as they pertain to not using chemical weapons. He said the alternative to the political transition strategy was more violence, a Syria that "heads increasingly towards an abyss, a worse humanitarian crisis and possibly even ethnic cleansing and the breakup of the Syrian state. He said the opposition supports the peace plan and the transition strategy and that it was up to the government to make good on its obligations, also as they pertain to not using chemical weapons.
Kerry acknowledged that the final proof of whether Assad's forces used chemical weapons in two attacks in March, as suggested last week by a US intelligence assessment, would go a long way towards determining what course of action Barack Obama takes. Talking about the US-Russian peace strategy, he said, "much will depend on what happens over the course of these next weeks". Lavrov and Kerry appeared chummy, exchanging whispers and slaps on the back, in marked contrast to the strained relationship the longtime Russian foreign minister maintained with the new secretary of state's predecessors. He also described his talks with Putin as "warm and friendly".
Lavrov also expressed concerns about chemical weapons' use, but stressed the need for clear facts before any course of action is rashly decided upon. The Russian president left Kerry waiting for several hours as he berated the cabinet of his prime minister, Dmitry Medvedev. The two men's meeting in the Kremlin, originally planned to last under an hour, ran to three.
Neither official spoke about Israel's actions in recent days, which have included air strikes on what it says were weapons being readied for transfer to the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah. Israel's increased involvement has created new complications for all actors in the war, given its long history of conflict with much of the Arab world.
guardian.co.uk today is our daily snapshot of the top news stories, sent to your inbox at 8amguardian.co.uk today is our daily snapshot of the top news stories, sent to your inbox at 8am