This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/10/benghazi-state-susan-rice-talking-points

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Benghazi: State Department 'pressed to change' Susan Rice talking points Benghazi: State Department 'pressed to change' Susan Rice talking points
(10 days later)
Senior State Department officials pressed for changes in the talking points that UN ambassador Susan Rice used after the deadly attack on the US diplomatic mission in Libya last September, expressing concerns that Congress might criticize the Obama administration for ignoring warnings of a growing threat in Benghazi.Senior State Department officials pressed for changes in the talking points that UN ambassador Susan Rice used after the deadly attack on the US diplomatic mission in Libya last September, expressing concerns that Congress might criticize the Obama administration for ignoring warnings of a growing threat in Benghazi.
An interim report by Republicans on five House committees last month had detailed how the talking points were changed, days after the 11 September attack and in the heat of the 2012 presidential campaign. New details about the political concerns and the names of the administration officials who wrote emails concerning the talking points emerged on Friday.An interim report by Republicans on five House committees last month had detailed how the talking points were changed, days after the 11 September attack and in the heat of the 2012 presidential campaign. New details about the political concerns and the names of the administration officials who wrote emails concerning the talking points emerged on Friday.
The White House has insisted that it made only stylistic changes to the intelligence agency talking points, in which Rice suggested that protests over an anti-Islamic video had set off the attack that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. Before the presidential election, the administration said Rice's talking points were based on the best intelligence assessments available in the immediate aftermath of the attack.The White House has insisted that it made only stylistic changes to the intelligence agency talking points, in which Rice suggested that protests over an anti-Islamic video had set off the attack that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. Before the presidential election, the administration said Rice's talking points were based on the best intelligence assessments available in the immediate aftermath of the attack.
But the report and the new details that emerged on Friday suggest a greater degree of White House and State Department involvement.But the report and the new details that emerged on Friday suggest a greater degree of White House and State Department involvement.
The latest developments are certain to add fuel to the politically charged debate over Benghazi. Republicans have suggested that the Obama administration sought to play down the possibility of terrorism during the campaign and has misled the country. A senior administration official reiterated on Friday that the talking points were based on intelligence assessments and developed during an interagency process, which included the CIA and officials from the Director of National Intelligence, State Department, FBI and Justice Department. The official commented only on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to speak publicly about the investigationThe latest developments are certain to add fuel to the politically charged debate over Benghazi. Republicans have suggested that the Obama administration sought to play down the possibility of terrorism during the campaign and has misled the country. A senior administration official reiterated on Friday that the talking points were based on intelligence assessments and developed during an interagency process, which included the CIA and officials from the Director of National Intelligence, State Department, FBI and Justice Department. The official commented only on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to speak publicly about the investigation
Last 14 September, two days before Rice's appearance on television, the CIA's initial draft of the talking points referred to Islamic extremists taking part in the attack in Benghazi, possible links to Islamic extremist group Ansar al-Sharia, a CIA assessment of threats from extremists linked to al-Qaida and a mention of five previous attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi.Last 14 September, two days before Rice's appearance on television, the CIA's initial draft of the talking points referred to Islamic extremists taking part in the attack in Benghazi, possible links to Islamic extremist group Ansar al-Sharia, a CIA assessment of threats from extremists linked to al-Qaida and a mention of five previous attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi.
A congressional official who reviewed 100 pages of emails and the 12 pages of talking points said former State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland expressed concerns about the talking points, writing that they "could be abused by members of Congress to beat the State Department for not paying attention to agency warnings so why would we want to seed the Hill". The reference to al-Sharia was deleted, but Nuland wrote later that night, "these don't resolve all my issues and those of my building leadership, they are consulting with NSS" – a reference to the National Security staff within the White House.A congressional official who reviewed 100 pages of emails and the 12 pages of talking points said former State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland expressed concerns about the talking points, writing that they "could be abused by members of Congress to beat the State Department for not paying attention to agency warnings so why would we want to seed the Hill". The reference to al-Sharia was deleted, but Nuland wrote later that night, "these don't resolve all my issues and those of my building leadership, they are consulting with NSS" – a reference to the National Security staff within the White House.
A meeting of senior officials was convened on the Saturday morning after the attack, to work on the talking points. The meeting included officials from the White House, State Department and CIA.A meeting of senior officials was convened on the Saturday morning after the attack, to work on the talking points. The meeting included officials from the White House, State Department and CIA.
Deleted from the final talking points were mention of al-Qaida, the experience of fighters in Libya and Islamic extremists, according to the congressional official, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to speak publicly about the emails that have not been released.Deleted from the final talking points were mention of al-Qaida, the experience of fighters in Libya and Islamic extremists, according to the congressional official, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to speak publicly about the emails that have not been released.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.