This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/may/16/atomic-weapons-establishment-safety-breach-trident

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Nuclear warhead maker admits safety breach over 2010 fire Nuclear warhead maker admits safety breach over 2010 fire
(5 days later)
The Atomic Weapons Establishment, which makes and maintains warheads for the UK's Trident nuclear deterrent, has admitted putting employees at risk.The Atomic Weapons Establishment, which makes and maintains warheads for the UK's Trident nuclear deterrent, has admitted putting employees at risk.
Failings in safety procedures led to one member of staff being injured in a fire at AWE's complex in Aldermaston, Berkshire, on 3 August 2010, it admitted.Failings in safety procedures led to one member of staff being injured in a fire at AWE's complex in Aldermaston, Berkshire, on 3 August 2010, it admitted.
On Thursday, AWE pleaded guilty at Reading crown court to a single count of breaching safety law in relation to the 2010 fire.On Thursday, AWE pleaded guilty at Reading crown court to a single count of breaching safety law in relation to the 2010 fire.
The court heard there were no radiological implications as the fire took place in a part of the plant which deals with conventional explosives, but residents nearby were evacuated.The court heard there were no radiological implications as the fire took place in a part of the plant which deals with conventional explosives, but residents nearby were evacuated.
Production at one of the site's buildings was suspended in January this year over separate safety concerns following a routine inspection.Production at one of the site's buildings was suspended in January this year over separate safety concerns following a routine inspection.
Bernard Thoroughgood, prosecuting for the Health and Safety Executive, told the court that senior management bore responsibility for the failures.Bernard Thoroughgood, prosecuting for the Health and Safety Executive, told the court that senior management bore responsibility for the failures.
"It is the prosecution's case that the facts show that management at a more senior level than those in the particular building (where the fire happened) are here culpable and at fault," he said."It is the prosecution's case that the facts show that management at a more senior level than those in the particular building (where the fire happened) are here culpable and at fault," he said.
"When failures continue over time, that goes way beyond those making decisions on an hour-to-hour basis – it goes right up to senior management.""When failures continue over time, that goes way beyond those making decisions on an hour-to-hour basis – it goes right up to senior management."
AWE is owned by a consortium of the Jacobs Engineering Group, Lockheed Martin UK and Serco, but the government has a "golden share" and is the proprietor of the site where the fire broke out.AWE is owned by a consortium of the Jacobs Engineering Group, Lockheed Martin UK and Serco, but the government has a "golden share" and is the proprietor of the site where the fire broke out.
The court heard that AWE failed its workers in terms of "hazard identification, risk assessment, training, supervision, monitoring and audit".The court heard that AWE failed its workers in terms of "hazard identification, risk assessment, training, supervision, monitoring and audit".
The injured worker, Ashley Emery, received burns to his face and arm, and was left with a visible scar on the arm.The injured worker, Ashley Emery, received burns to his face and arm, and was left with a visible scar on the arm.
He was working late in the evening with highly flammable material while wearing inadequate personal protection gear in a building containing high explosive material.He was working late in the evening with highly flammable material while wearing inadequate personal protection gear in a building containing high explosive material.
When he noticed bubbling which troubled him, he moved back but was caught by a fireball.When he noticed bubbling which troubled him, he moved back but was caught by a fireball.
In extracts from a statement read to the court, Emery described how he was "overwhelmed by a bright orange flash and whooshing sound".In extracts from a statement read to the court, Emery described how he was "overwhelmed by a bright orange flash and whooshing sound".
"He found this very distressing, very shocking and has not felt able to return to being an explosives worker," Thoroughgood said, adding: "He describes a variety of flashbacks, nightmares and worries that he did not use to have, and he has had some medication, as he explained, for anxiety and other problems.""He found this very distressing, very shocking and has not felt able to return to being an explosives worker," Thoroughgood said, adding: "He describes a variety of flashbacks, nightmares and worries that he did not use to have, and he has had some medication, as he explained, for anxiety and other problems."
The fire was attended by 68 personnel from three fire and rescue services, including AWE's on-site crew.The fire was attended by 68 personnel from three fire and rescue services, including AWE's on-site crew.
It had not been possible to determine beyond reasonable doubt the exact cause of the blaze but it was probably an electrostatic discharge, the court heard.It had not been possible to determine beyond reasonable doubt the exact cause of the blaze but it was probably an electrostatic discharge, the court heard.
The prosecutor admitted the fire posed a low risk of detonation, but added that any explosion within the room would have had potentially damaging effects.The prosecutor admitted the fire posed a low risk of detonation, but added that any explosion within the room would have had potentially damaging effects.
"When dealing with explosives one is faced with consequences, and the consequences if there had been a detonation here would have been very severe indeed," he said."When dealing with explosives one is faced with consequences, and the consequences if there had been a detonation here would have been very severe indeed," he said.
He claimed there had been conservatism in the production methods used at the plant, which prevented the introduction of better procedures.He claimed there had been conservatism in the production methods used at the plant, which prevented the introduction of better procedures.
The court heard that AWE had turnover of £868m in 2012 and profits after tax of £11.3m.The court heard that AWE had turnover of £868m in 2012 and profits after tax of £11.3m.
It has more than 4,000 employees at the Aldermaston plant.It has more than 4,000 employees at the Aldermaston plant.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. Enter your email address to subscribe.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.