This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/jun/06/teacher-child-images-schools-panel

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Teacher caught with child abuse images can work in schools, panel rules Teacher caught with child abuse images can work in schools, panel rules
(4 months later)
A teacher sacked for possessing indecent images of children should be allowed to return to work in schools, a panel has ruled.A teacher sacked for possessing indecent images of children should be allowed to return to work in schools, a panel has ruled.
Geoffrey Bettley, 36, was suspended from St Mary's Catholic school in Menston, West Yorkshire, in December 2010 after police found nearly 200 child abuse images on his computer.Geoffrey Bettley, 36, was suspended from St Mary's Catholic school in Menston, West Yorkshire, in December 2010 after police found nearly 200 child abuse images on his computer.
He accepted a police caution and was dismissed by the school following a disciplinary hearing in December 2011.He accepted a police caution and was dismissed by the school following a disciplinary hearing in December 2011.
But a professional conduct panel has ruled that the RE teacher should be allowed to return to teaching after concluding he "does not represent a risk to children and young people".But a professional conduct panel has ruled that the RE teacher should be allowed to return to teaching after concluding he "does not represent a risk to children and young people".
In its judgment, the National College of Teaching and Leadership professional conduct panel said the images viewed by Bettley were "not at the most serious end" of the Copine scale – the rating system used to categorise the severity of images of child sex abuse – and there were "relatively few" on his computer.In its judgment, the National College of Teaching and Leadership professional conduct panel said the images viewed by Bettley were "not at the most serious end" of the Copine scale – the rating system used to categorise the severity of images of child sex abuse – and there were "relatively few" on his computer.
His behaviour did not show a "deep-seated attitude which leads to harmful behaviour", it ruled.His behaviour did not show a "deep-seated attitude which leads to harmful behaviour", it ruled.
"Mr Bettley, does not, in the view of the panel, represent a risk to children and young people," the panel said."Mr Bettley, does not, in the view of the panel, represent a risk to children and young people," the panel said.
"Although the findings in this case are serious ones, for the reasons set out, I support the recommendation of the panel that a prohibition order should not be applied in this case.""Although the findings in this case are serious ones, for the reasons set out, I support the recommendation of the panel that a prohibition order should not be applied in this case."
Bettley was employed at St Mary's from September 2001 to December 2011. He visited a website in March 2009 where he viewed six child abuse images, according to the panel's ruling.Bettley was employed at St Mary's from September 2001 to December 2011. He visited a website in March 2009 where he viewed six child abuse images, according to the panel's ruling.
When his computer was seized by the police in December 2010, 143 images were found at level one of the Copine scale, which covers nudity and/or erotic posing.When his computer was seized by the police in December 2010, 143 images were found at level one of the Copine scale, which covers nudity and/or erotic posing.
A further 46 images considered to be at level three on the scale were found but had not been opened, the panel said.A further 46 images considered to be at level three on the scale were found but had not been opened, the panel said.
Bettley acknowledged that the images were of underage children and were child abuse images and admitted to police that he had accessed and viewed the images, the panel said.Bettley acknowledged that the images were of underage children and were child abuse images and admitted to police that he had accessed and viewed the images, the panel said.
He was cautioned for the offence of possessing an indecent photograph or pseudo-photograph of a child and placed on the sex offenders register for two years, according to the ruling.He was cautioned for the offence of possessing an indecent photograph or pseudo-photograph of a child and placed on the sex offenders register for two years, according to the ruling.
In the judgment, the panel said Bettley's conduct had brought his profession into disrepute but acknowledged the Independent Safeguarding Authority had since removed his name from the children's barred list and the adult's barred list.In the judgment, the panel said Bettley's conduct had brought his profession into disrepute but acknowledged the Independent Safeguarding Authority had since removed his name from the children's barred list and the adult's barred list.
A report from Leeds children and young people's social care in September 2011 had also concluded that Bettley posed little risk, the panel added.A report from Leeds children and young people's social care in September 2011 had also concluded that Bettley posed little risk, the panel added.
A Department for Education spokeswoman said: "We keep the process under review because of legal complexities and we are examining whether this case was handled correctly."A Department for Education spokeswoman said: "We keep the process under review because of legal complexities and we are examining whether this case was handled correctly."
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.