This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-22912375

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Sellafield fined for sending radioactive waste to wrong site Sellafield fined for sending radioactive waste to wrong site
(about 5 hours later)
A nuclear plant firm in Cumbria has been fined £700,000 after admitting sending low-level radioactive waste to a landfill site. The owner of the Sellafield nuclear plant has been fined £700,000 after admitting sending low-level radioactive waste to a landfill site.
Sellafield Limited admitted sending four bags, containing plastic and metal waste, from its plant to Lillyhall landfill in Workington in April 2010.Sellafield Limited admitted sending four bags, containing plastic and metal waste, from its plant to Lillyhall landfill in Workington in April 2010.
The bags should have been sent to the Low Level Waste Repository at Drigg.The bags should have been sent to the Low Level Waste Repository at Drigg.
Sellafield spokesman Tom Foster said extra safety checks had been implemented at the plant.
The charges were brought to Carlisle Crown Court by the Environment Agency and the Health and Safety Executive.The charges were brought to Carlisle Crown Court by the Environment Agency and the Health and Safety Executive.
Judge Peter Hughes told the hearing that there had been basic management failures at the site which demonstrated a culture that was "too lax", and to a degree "complacent". Despite Mr Foster claiming Sellafield "didn't meet our own expectations" in respect of safely disposing of the dangerous materials, he said the firm was considering appealing against the amount of the fine.
Tests have since established there was no contamination at the landfill site. Judge Peter Hughes told the hearing there had been basic management failures at the site which demonstrated a culture that was "too lax" and to a degree "complacent".
All four of the bags, which contained plastic, metal and wood, were retrieved from the landfill and returned to Sellafield for correct disposal.All four of the bags, which contained plastic, metal and wood, were retrieved from the landfill and returned to Sellafield for correct disposal.
Sellafield said the error was caused by a new monitor which had passed the bags as "general" waste making them exempt from strict disposal controls. Sellafield said the bags had wrongly been marked as "general" waste making them exempt from strict disposal controls.