This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-22954586

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Jail reckless bankers, standards commission urges Jail reckless bankers, standards commission urges
(about 2 hours later)
Senior bankers guilty of reckless misconduct should be jailed, a long-awaited report on banking commissioned by the government has recommended.Senior bankers guilty of reckless misconduct should be jailed, a long-awaited report on banking commissioned by the government has recommended.
The Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards was set up by Chancellor George Osborne last year after a number of scandals involving the industry.The Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards was set up by Chancellor George Osborne last year after a number of scandals involving the industry.
The cross-party group's fifth report attacked the lack of accountability of bankers and also said some bonuses should be withheld for up to 10 years.The cross-party group's fifth report attacked the lack of accountability of bankers and also said some bonuses should be withheld for up to 10 years.
The Treasury has welcomed the report.The Treasury has welcomed the report.
It called it "a very impressive piece of work" and promised to provide a response before the summer recess.It called it "a very impressive piece of work" and promised to provide a response before the summer recess.
"Where legislation is needed, we have said we will support it, and the banking bill currently before Parliament can be amended to ensure they are quickly enacted," a spokesman added."Where legislation is needed, we have said we will support it, and the banking bill currently before Parliament can be amended to ensure they are quickly enacted," a spokesman added.
The 571-page report also called on the government to review alternatives for selling off the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), including breaking it up, and demanded action to make the banking market more competitive.The 571-page report also called on the government to review alternatives for selling off the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), including breaking it up, and demanded action to make the banking market more competitive.
Criminal liabilityCriminal liability
"Too many bankers, especially at the most senior levels, have operated in an environment with insufficient personal responsibility," the report says."Too many bankers, especially at the most senior levels, have operated in an environment with insufficient personal responsibility," the report says.
"Senior executives were aware that they would not be punished for what they could not see and promptly donned the blindfolds."Senior executives were aware that they would not be punished for what they could not see and promptly donned the blindfolds.
"Where they could not claim ignorance, they fell back on the claim that everyone was party to a decision, so that no individual could be held squarely to blame - the Murder on the Orient Express defence.""Where they could not claim ignorance, they fell back on the claim that everyone was party to a decision, so that no individual could be held squarely to blame - the Murder on the Orient Express defence."
The report advocated:The report advocated:
"Why are there no banged-up bankers?" said Liberal Democrat peer Lord Oakeshott, who backed the committee's findings. "That's what most people want to know after the last five years of scandals and shame." Shadow chancellor Ed Balls said the report offered a blueprint for the "radical change" needed. He said: "I hope the chancellor won't drag his feet. We need our banks working well in the future - this report shows us what to do."
And Liberal Democrat peer Lord Oakeshott, who backed the committee's findings, said: "Why are there no banged-up bankers? That's what most people want to know after the last five years of scandals and shame."
RBS conundrumRBS conundrum
The report called for more to be done to boost competition among banks, including two further investigations.The report called for more to be done to boost competition among banks, including two further investigations.
One, by a government panel of experts, would look at how to make it easier for people to transfer their bank accounts, while the other would be a full investigation of retail banking and small business lending by the Competition and Markets Authority.One, by a government panel of experts, would look at how to make it easier for people to transfer their bank accounts, while the other would be a full investigation of retail banking and small business lending by the Competition and Markets Authority.
Consumer watchdog Which? welcomed the proposals, saying it could herald "the big change in banking that consumers have been crying out for".Consumer watchdog Which? welcomed the proposals, saying it could herald "the big change in banking that consumers have been crying out for".
But the group said more needed to be done to change banking culture, and called for an independent code of conduct.But the group said more needed to be done to change banking culture, and called for an independent code of conduct.
The committee also criticised the male-dominated culture on trading floors, saying banks should be required to publish their gender ratios and take action where there is a significant imbalance.The committee also criticised the male-dominated culture on trading floors, saying banks should be required to publish their gender ratios and take action where there is a significant imbalance.
On RBS, the committee only said that the government should formally consider alternative options for the nationalised bank by September.On RBS, the committee only said that the government should formally consider alternative options for the nationalised bank by September.
One alternative - backed by some but not all committee members - would involve splitting it between a "good bank" - an active High Street lender with a cleaned-up balance sheet - and a "bad bank" - a warehouse for all of the dud loans left over from last decade's debt bubble.One alternative - backed by some but not all committee members - would involve splitting it between a "good bank" - an active High Street lender with a cleaned-up balance sheet - and a "bad bank" - a warehouse for all of the dud loans left over from last decade's debt bubble.
Another option, backed by the Archbishop of Canterbury and committee member Justin Welby, would split RBS up into a number of smaller regional banks.Another option, backed by the Archbishop of Canterbury and committee member Justin Welby, would split RBS up into a number of smaller regional banks.
In any case, the committee cautioned against rushing to privatise the bank, which it said risked getting poor value for the taxpayer, and because the committee believed RBS first needed to be restructured, in order to make sure it played its key role in supporting the economy.In any case, the committee cautioned against rushing to privatise the bank, which it said risked getting poor value for the taxpayer, and because the committee believed RBS first needed to be restructured, in order to make sure it played its key role in supporting the economy.
The report also called for an end to the government's purportedly "arms-length" ownership of RBS and Lloyds via the holding company UKFI - an arrangement set up under Gordon Brown and described as a "fig leaf" disguising the government's increasing interference in the running of the two banks, especially RBS.The report also called for an end to the government's purportedly "arms-length" ownership of RBS and Lloyds via the holding company UKFI - an arrangement set up under Gordon Brown and described as a "fig leaf" disguising the government's increasing interference in the running of the two banks, especially RBS.
'Special measures''Special measures'
The committee also criticised the failure of regulators to spot the risks building up in the financial system prior to 2008, demanding "the replacement of mechanical data collection and box ticking by a much greater emphasis on the exercise of judgement".The committee also criticised the failure of regulators to spot the risks building up in the financial system prior to 2008, demanding "the replacement of mechanical data collection and box ticking by a much greater emphasis on the exercise of judgement".
Senior regulators should be personally accountable, ultimately to Parliament, for their oversight of the banks.Senior regulators should be personally accountable, ultimately to Parliament, for their oversight of the banks.
The report recommended that each bank's board should be required to institute procedures to protect whistle-blowers - employees who want to flag up misconduct to the regulators The report recommended that each bank's board should be required to institute procedures to protect whistle-blowers - employees who want to flag up misconduct to the regulators.
The Financial Services Authority, which was the overall banking regulator up to and during the financial crisis, has been split into two separate units - the Financial Conduct Authority, which polices banker behaviour, and the Bank of England's Prudential Regulation Authority, which ensures the banks do not take excessive risks.The Financial Services Authority, which was the overall banking regulator up to and during the financial crisis, has been split into two separate units - the Financial Conduct Authority, which polices banker behaviour, and the Bank of England's Prudential Regulation Authority, which ensures the banks do not take excessive risks.
If either regulator spots a pattern of shoddy standards at a bank, the commission said that the two should be able to put the bank into "special measures", meaning the bank would be formally required to deal with any shortcomings identified in its general culture or systems.If either regulator spots a pattern of shoddy standards at a bank, the commission said that the two should be able to put the bank into "special measures", meaning the bank would be formally required to deal with any shortcomings identified in its general culture or systems.
The committee repeated its demand that the chancellor allow regulators to set a more conservative "leverage ratio" for the banks.The committee repeated its demand that the chancellor allow regulators to set a more conservative "leverage ratio" for the banks.
The leverage ratio is the minimum amount of loss-absorbing capital that a bank must hold, as a percentage of its total loans and investments.The leverage ratio is the minimum amount of loss-absorbing capital that a bank must hold, as a percentage of its total loans and investments.
Mr Osborne has said the limit should be set at 3%, in line with a new international requirement from the Basel committee of central bankers. But the committee has the figure should be much higher.Mr Osborne has said the limit should be set at 3%, in line with a new international requirement from the Basel committee of central bankers. But the committee has the figure should be much higher.