This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23042688

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 7 Version 8
Leveson-style inquiry should examine police ethics, Lawrence lawyer says Stephen Lawrence officer will only give evidence to fresh inquiry
(about 3 hours later)
A Leveson-style inquiry is needed to investigate the ethics of the police, according to a lawyer who represented the family of Stephen Lawrence. An ex-police officer who claimed he was asked to smear murder victim Stephen Lawrence's family has said he would only give evidence to a fresh inquiry.
The home secretary has said claims that police tried to smear the family will be looked at by two existing inquiries. Peter Francis said he had "no faith" in two existing inquiries that the home secretary says can probe the allegations.
But Michael Mansfield QC said the conduct of undercover police officers must be examined more widely. He told the Guardian "only a judicial-led or public inquiry... has any chance of ever establishing the truth".
Met Police Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe said he would support a fresh inquiry into the Lawrence claims. There have already been a number of calls for a wider inquiry.
Met Police Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe has said he would support a public inquiry if the government decided on this.
Black teenager Stephen, 18, was stabbed to death in an unprovoked attack by a gang of white youths as he waited at a bus stop in south-east London in April 1993.Black teenager Stephen, 18, was stabbed to death in an unprovoked attack by a gang of white youths as he waited at a bus stop in south-east London in April 1993.
A number of suspects were identified soon afterwards but it took more than 18 years to bring his killers to justice. An inquiry accused the police of institutional racism and found failings in how they had investigated the murder. A number of suspects were identified but it took more than 18 years to bring his killers to justice. An inquiry accused the police of institutional racism and found failings in how they had investigated the murder.
Undercover officer Peter Francis told the Guardian and Channel 4's Dispatches programme that after Stephen's killing he posed as an anti-racism campaigner in a hunt for "disinformation". Former undercover officer Mr Francis told the Guardian and Channel 4's Dispatches programme that after Stephen's killing he posed as an anti-racism campaigner in a hunt for "disinformation".
Working as part of the Metropolitan Police's Special Demonstration Squad, he said he had come under pressure to find "any intelligence that could have smeared the campaign" - including whether any of the family were political activists, involved in demonstrations or drug dealers. Working as part of the Metropolitan Police's Special Demonstration Squad (SDS), he said he had come under pressure to find "any intelligence that could have smeared the campaign" - including whether any of the family were political activists, involved in demonstrations or drug dealers.
The SDS was set up in 1968 and employed about 100 officers during its lifetime before being disbanded in 2008. It examined anti-war and anti-nuclear movements, groups linked to paramilitaries in Northern Ireland, animal rights campaigns and the environmental protest movement. But answering readers' questions in a webchat for the Guardian on Wednesday, Mr Francis said: "I will not co-operate at all with the two inquiries the home secretary said can deal with these matters, even if they are 'supervised' by the Independent Police Complaints Commission.
'So-called democracy' "I have no faith in any of these inquiries.
Mr Mansfield told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "It's a squad that existed for a very long time. A squad of that size, involving those numbers, involving public expenditure of this kind does not go without authorisation from a very high level. "If there is a public inquiry, I will happily give all my evidence under oath, explaining what I personally know about the SDS and covert policing of protest groups."
"I think that's why the public need to have something like the Leveson Inquiry in relations to the ethics of the police in a so-called democracy. Home Secretary Theresa May announced on Monday that Mark Ellison QC - who successfully prosecuted Gary Dobson and David Norris for Stephen's murder in 2012 - would look into the smear allegations are part of his ongoing examination of police corruption during the original investigation into the killing.
"It can be achieved provided you have the right judge with the right focus and the right resources. This can be done quickly."
And he added: "Where was Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary throughout all these years? Why weren't questions being asked?"
A number of serious allegations have been levelled at the SDS, including:
On Monday, Home Secretary Theresa May said Mark Ellison QC - who successfully prosecuted Gary Dobson and David Norris for Stephen's murder in 2012 - would look into the smear allegations are part of his ongoing examination of police corruption during the original investigation into the killing.
She said they would also be looked at as part of Operation Herne, which is an investigation into undercover policing at the Met Police, being led by the chief constable of Derbyshire police, Mick Creedon.She said they would also be looked at as part of Operation Herne, which is an investigation into undercover policing at the Met Police, being led by the chief constable of Derbyshire police, Mick Creedon.
'Layers of independence' But Mr Francis has joined calls from other quarters for a wider inquiry.
Stephen father, Neville Lawrence, said on Monday that "nothing short of a judge-led public inquiry will suffice". Michael Mansfield QC, who represented the Lawrence family, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme, a Leveson-style inquiry was needed into the ethics of policing.
But on Tuesday, Stephen's brother Stuart Lawrence told ITV's This Morning one was not needed if 13 questions the family had put forward to the Met Police commissioner were answered. With regards the SDS, he said a "squad of that size, involving those numbers, involving public expenditure of this kind does not go without authorisation from a very high level."
"Those questions will help us understand who knew what, when they knew, etc," he said. The now-disbanded SDS examined anti-war and anti-nuclear movements, groups linked to paramilitaries in Northern Ireland, animal rights campaigns and the environmental protest movement.
The Newham Monitoring Project, which represented victims of police misconduct and racist violence in the London borough, was one of the groups said to be indirectly targeted by undercover police. A number of serious allegations have been levelled at the SDS, including:
In a statement the group said it is "appalled that campaigns we have advised and aided that were run by bereaved families struggling for justice for their loved ones after a death in police custody may have been targeted for covert surveillance" and it called for an independent inquiry. 'Clearly wrong'
Sir Bernard told radio station LBC there were "two or three layers of independence" in the inquiries already set up, but he understood why Mr Lawrence wanted a wider probe. Stephen's father, Neville Lawrence, has also said "nothing short of a judge-led public inquiry will suffice".
"I think a public inquiry is possible, I don't think it's for me to call that," he said. But Stephen's brother Stuart Lawrence told ITV's This Morning one was not needed if a list of questions the family had presented to the Met Police commissioner were answered.
Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe told radio station LBC there were "two or three layers of independence" in the inquiries already set up, but he understood why a wider probe was wanted.
A public inquiry could "take a long time", he said, and any discovery of wrongdoing would still have to be investigated further by the Independent Police Complaints Commission or the police themselves in order to take criminal or disciplinary action.A public inquiry could "take a long time", he said, and any discovery of wrongdoing would still have to be investigated further by the Independent Police Complaints Commission or the police themselves in order to take criminal or disciplinary action.
But he added: "If the government or Parliament decides they would prefer a public inquiry, of course we would support that."But he added: "If the government or Parliament decides they would prefer a public inquiry, of course we would support that."
The commissioner said he had ordered a review of undercover operations after taking charge two years ago and was confident things were "running correctly now".The commissioner said he had ordered a review of undercover operations after taking charge two years ago and was confident things were "running correctly now".
"I have to make the case for undercover officers. They are very courageous and where they are deployed properly and according to the law they go out and target serious organised crime.
"The only thing we have to be careful about is what relationships undercover officers are forming day to day."
Lord Condon - who was Met commissioner from 1993 to 2000 - has said he was not aware of any order to smear the Lawrence family and any such attempts would be "clearly wrong".Lord Condon - who was Met commissioner from 1993 to 2000 - has said he was not aware of any order to smear the Lawrence family and any such attempts would be "clearly wrong".
Pressure for a public inquiry has come from other sources too, including former Met Police Deputy Assistant Commissioner Brian Paddick and former Director of Public Prosecutions Lord MacDonald.Pressure for a public inquiry has come from other sources too, including former Met Police Deputy Assistant Commissioner Brian Paddick and former Director of Public Prosecutions Lord MacDonald.
Lord MacDonald told the BBC: "Chief Constable Creedon, who is running the police inquiry, said the public need to understand that the best people to investigate officers are police officers. Well, no, they are not."