This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-23045457

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Australia-Japan whaling case in international court Australia-Japan whaling case in international court
(about 5 hours later)
Australia and Japan take their fight over whaling to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague later, as public hearings get under way. Public hearings are under way in The Hague as Australia and Japan take their fight over whaling to the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
Australia is to argue that Tokyo's scientific research programme - under which it kills whales - is commercial whaling in disguise. Australia will argue that Tokyo's scientific research programme - under which it kills whales - is commercial whaling in disguise.
Japan - which aims to catch up to 1,000 whales each year - says it is ready to defend its right to conduct research.Japan - which aims to catch up to 1,000 whales each year - says it is ready to defend its right to conduct research.
There has been a ban on commercial whaling since 1986.There has been a ban on commercial whaling since 1986.
Australia initiated the legal action at the top UN court in 2010.Australia initiated the legal action at the top UN court in 2010.
'Halted''Halted'
Japan's whaling fleet leaves for the Southern Ocean in November or December each year, with a quota of of minke whales and fin whales whales to catch for what it says are scientific research purposes. Meat from the whales is sold commercially.Japan's whaling fleet leaves for the Southern Ocean in November or December each year, with a quota of of minke whales and fin whales whales to catch for what it says are scientific research purposes. Meat from the whales is sold commercially.
In recent years, catches have fallen substantially, mainly because of disruption techniques employed by anti-whaling activists.In recent years, catches have fallen substantially, mainly because of disruption techniques employed by anti-whaling activists.
Canberra alleges that the research programme breaches international laws and has no relevance to marine conservation. It says more than 10,000 whales have been killed under the programme.Canberra alleges that the research programme breaches international laws and has no relevance to marine conservation. It says more than 10,000 whales have been killed under the programme.
"Australia's views on whaling are well established. We strongly oppose all commercial whaling, including so-called 'scientific' whale hunting by Japan," said Attorney-General Markus Dreyfus, who will represent Australia in court. "Australia's views on whaling are well established. We strongly oppose all commercial whaling, including so-called 'scientific' whale hunting by Japan," said Attorney-General Markus Dreyfus, who is representing Australia in court.
"We want to see the practice halted once and for all.""We want to see the practice halted once and for all."
Tokyo says there are cultural reasons behind the annual hunt and that its whaling is sustainable. It also argues that its research provides information on whale stocks with a view to re-examining the ban on commercial whaling in the future.Tokyo says there are cultural reasons behind the annual hunt and that its whaling is sustainable. It also argues that its research provides information on whale stocks with a view to re-examining the ban on commercial whaling in the future.
"Japan will fully engage with the case so that the country's position and thinking will be understood," Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida said."Japan will fully engage with the case so that the country's position and thinking will be understood," Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida said.
New Zealand will be supporting Australia at the ICJ and the court's decision is considered legally binding. New Zealand is supporting Australia at the ICJ and the court's decision is considered legally binding.
The hearings will last for several days but a judgement is not expected for several months.The hearings will last for several days but a judgement is not expected for several months.