This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/jun/28/nadine-dorries-expenses-protest

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Nadine Dorries to work 'for free' in expenses protest Nadine Dorries to work 'for free' in expenses protest
(3 months later)
The Tory MP Nadine Dorries has said she can afford to work "for free" as she campaigns over parliamentary expenses because her partner "will not let her starve".The Tory MP Nadine Dorries has said she can afford to work "for free" as she campaigns over parliamentary expenses because her partner "will not let her starve".
The MP for Mid Bedfordshire, whose expenses are under investigation by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa), announced on Thursday that she would stop claiming from the end of next month so that she can argue for reform of the system.The MP for Mid Bedfordshire, whose expenses are under investigation by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa), announced on Thursday that she would stop claiming from the end of next month so that she can argue for reform of the system.
Dorries, who took a break from her parliamentary duties to appear on I'm A Celebrity last year, argues that this amounts to working for free because she will have to fund her second home in London from her salary.Dorries, who took a break from her parliamentary duties to appear on I'm A Celebrity last year, argues that this amounts to working for free because she will have to fund her second home in London from her salary.
Asked how she would be able to afford the move, she told ITV Daybreak: "Well, I have a very good partner who will not let me starve, he will feed me. Most MPs can't afford to do that.Asked how she would be able to afford the move, she told ITV Daybreak: "Well, I have a very good partner who will not let me starve, he will feed me. Most MPs can't afford to do that.
"I come from a council estate, I do not have a rich background, but expenses are there in order for MPs to do their jobs – you can't do your job unless you have a second home in Westminster."I come from a council estate, I do not have a rich background, but expenses are there in order for MPs to do their jobs – you can't do your job unless you have a second home in Westminster.
"But the public do not believe that, they do not understand that, because, since I made the announcement yesterday morning, I have been overwhelmed by members of the public saying: 'Well done, you. That is a great thing to do.'"But the public do not believe that, they do not understand that, because, since I made the announcement yesterday morning, I have been overwhelmed by members of the public saying: 'Well done, you. That is a great thing to do.'
"Well, actually, I'm going to be working for nothing because my £3,000 [monthly] salary will go to pay for my second home in Westminster, which I need to do my job."Well, actually, I'm going to be working for nothing because my £3,000 [monthly] salary will go to pay for my second home in Westminster, which I need to do my job.
"The public perception is that expenses are something which are given to MPs as an extra – it's not and they have to be scrapped.""The public perception is that expenses are something which are given to MPs as an extra – it's not and they have to be scrapped."
Dorries said she was not calling for a pay rise and argued that one solution may be to buy a block of flats for MPs to use as second homes in Westminster.Dorries said she was not calling for a pay rise and argued that one solution may be to buy a block of flats for MPs to use as second homes in Westminster.
She said she believed there was no longer any abuse of expenses by MPs. "The whole point of establishing Ipsa was that no MPs have any responsibility for their own expenses – they are now administered by Ipsa, who have actually made the system much more complicated, more inefficient and given more opportunity for the perception of wrongdoing," she said.She said she believed there was no longer any abuse of expenses by MPs. "The whole point of establishing Ipsa was that no MPs have any responsibility for their own expenses – they are now administered by Ipsa, who have actually made the system much more complicated, more inefficient and given more opportunity for the perception of wrongdoing," she said.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.