This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23132233

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Legal aid concession offered by ministers Legal aid concession offered by ministers
(about 2 hours later)
Ministers have offered a concession in their overhaul of legal aid in England and Wales, which will allow defendants in criminal cases to still choose their own solicitor. Plans to remove the right of legal aid defendants in criminal cases in England and Wales to choose their solicitor have been scrapped.
The U-turn comes amid opposition from the legal profession to a plan to introduce competitive tendering, based on price, for legal aid awards. Ministers planned to put the onus on lawyers competing for contracts but have said it now recognises choice is seen as "fundamental".
Ministers said it was clear client choice was seen as "fundamental". The Ministry of Justice said it was now "developing alternatives" to include competitive tendering and "some extent" of choice for defendants.
The Law Society and Bar Council welcomed the move. Lawyers' groups welcomed the change.
The government is planning to cut £220m from the annual criminal case legal aid budget in England and Wales. The plan to remove defendants' right to choose was part of the government's drive to cut £220m from the annual criminal case legal aid budget in England and Wales.
Other aspects of the scheme, such as a suggestion defendants with a disposable income of more than £37,500 should not get automatic access to legal aid, remain unchanged.
Legal aid costs taxpayers about £2bn every year and criminal defence makes up more than half of the expenditure, a situation which ministers say is unsustainable in the current financial climate.Legal aid costs taxpayers about £2bn every year and criminal defence makes up more than half of the expenditure, a situation which ministers say is unsustainable in the current financial climate.
'Greater certainty''Greater certainty'
The government wants to see fewer but bigger organisations providing legal aid as part of a streamlined system in which those with a disposable income of more than £37,500 would not have automatic access to state support. The government wants to see fewer but bigger organisations providing legal aid as part of a streamlined system.
But the Bar Council has argued this would result in the end of the long-held right of a defendant to choose a legal aid solicitor and people would effectively be allocated a representative on the basis of cost.But the Bar Council has argued this would result in the end of the long-held right of a defendant to choose a legal aid solicitor and people would effectively be allocated a representative on the basis of cost.
A senior judge warned last month people with disabilities would not be able to choose a lawyer who understood their condition, and those involved in complex cases would not be able to seek out specialists.A senior judge warned last month people with disabilities would not be able to choose a lawyer who understood their condition, and those involved in complex cases would not be able to seek out specialists.
An online petition against "depriving citizens of legal aid or the right to representation by the solicitor of their choice" received over 100,000 signatures - the threshold required potentially to force a parliamentary debate. An online petition against "depriving citizens of legal aid or the right to representation by the solicitor of their choice" received more than 100,000 signatures - the threshold required to be considered for a parliamentary debate.
Justice Secretary Chris Grayling said he was now prepared to reconsider the original proposal as long as what emerged still met the "core objectives" of his overall reforms to create a more cost-effective and efficient system. Justice Secretary Chris Grayling said he was prepared to reconsider the original proposal as long as it still met the "core objectives" of his reforms to create a more cost-effective and efficient system.
"The rationale for proposing this change was to give greater certainty of case volume for providers, making it easier and more predictable for them to organise their businesses," he said in a letter to Commons Justice Committee chairman Sir Alan Beith. "The rationale for proposing this change was to give greater certainty of case volume for providers, making it easier and more predictable for them to organise their businesses," he wrote in a letter to Commons Justice Committee chairman Sir Alan Beith.
"It is not a policy objective in its own right. However, I have heard clearly from the Law Society and other respondents that they regard client choice as fundamental to the effective delivery of criminal legal aid. "It is not a policy objective in its own right. However, I have heard clearly from the Law Society and other respondents that they regard client choice as fundamental to the effective delivery of criminal legal aid."
"I am therefore looking again at this issue and expect to make changes to allow a choice of solicitor for clients receiving criminal legal aid."
Mr Grayling said he was also prepared to consider arguments for a gradual consolidation of legal aid providers in order to preserve quality of representation and prevent "advice deserts" in certain areas.Mr Grayling said he was also prepared to consider arguments for a gradual consolidation of legal aid providers in order to preserve quality of representation and prevent "advice deserts" in certain areas.
"As I have consistently made clear, this is a genuine consultation," he added. "I have made clear throughout that I am open to alternative proposals that meet the same objectives, including delivering the same level of savings." He added: "I have made clear throughout that I am open to alternative proposals that meet the same objectives, including delivering the same level of savings."
But the justice secretary said his department's settlement in the recent Spending Review - which will see it have to make a further 10% cuts in 2015-16 - should "leave no-one in any doubt" about the need for savings in legal aid.But the justice secretary said his department's settlement in the recent Spending Review - which will see it have to make a further 10% cuts in 2015-16 - should "leave no-one in any doubt" about the need for savings in legal aid.
The Law Society, which represents solicitors, said the the move was "great news". A Ministry of Justice spokesman said it was considering how to combine competitive tendering by law firms with "some extent" of choice for defendants.
The Law Society, which represents solicitors, welcomed the move.
"Client choice is important not just as a matter of principle but also as a matter of practicality," president Lucy Scott-Moncrieff told BBC Radio 4's Today programme."Client choice is important not just as a matter of principle but also as a matter of practicality," president Lucy Scott-Moncrieff told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
"If people can choose their lawyer then lawyers will make every effort to attract work by doing their job as well as they can.""If people can choose their lawyer then lawyers will make every effort to attract work by doing their job as well as they can."
And the Bar Council said the concession was a "significant victory" for opponents of the government's wider proposals.And the Bar Council said the concession was a "significant victory" for opponents of the government's wider proposals.
"We welcome the government's change of heart on this, but we hope it is also listening to the many voices which are clear that price competitive tendering in any form is not a suitable mechanism for allocating legal aid contracts," Maura McGowan QC, chairwoman of the council, said."We welcome the government's change of heart on this, but we hope it is also listening to the many voices which are clear that price competitive tendering in any form is not a suitable mechanism for allocating legal aid contracts," Maura McGowan QC, chairwoman of the council, said.
"Legal aid contracts should not just go to the bidders who are willing to do the work for the lowest price.""Legal aid contracts should not just go to the bidders who are willing to do the work for the lowest price."