This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/15/world/middleeast/israel-calls-for-new-urgency-on-iran.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Israel Calls for New Urgency on Iran Israel Calls for New Urgency on Iran
(about 2 hours later)
JERUSALEM — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tried Sunday to ramp up pressure on the White House and the world regarding Iran’s nuclear program, complaining that there was not enough urgency on the issue and that Washington must demonstrate to Iran’s newly elected president “by action” that “the military option which is on the table is truly on the table.” JERUSALEM — Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ramped up pressure on the White House on Sunday to put the buildup of Iran’s nuclear program ahead of other crises in the Middle East, complaining of a lack of urgency on the issue and saying that the Obama administration must demonstrate “by action” to Iran’s newly elected president that “the military option which is on the table is truly on the table.”
Speaking via satellite on the CBS program “Face the Nation,” Mr. Netanyahu reiterated his familiar demands that Iran must be forced to stop the enrichment of nuclear material, remove already enriched uranium from the country and shut down the Qum nuclear facility. He said those demands “should be backed up with ratcheted sanctions,” adding, “They have to know you’ll be prepared to take military action; that’s the only thing that will get their attention.” Speaking via satellite on the CBS News program “Face the Nation,” Mr. Netanyahu expressed concern that Iran was pursuing “alternate routes” to a nuclear weapons capability, including a plutonium bomb, even while stopping just short of the specific enriched-uranium levels he had set in a speech at the United Nations last year as a “red line” for military action.
Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for civilian use. He also reiterated his familiar demands that Iran must be forced to stop all enrichment of nuclear material, ship its current stockpile out of the country and shut down a deep underground enrichment site, called Fordow, that Israeli military officials acknowledge they probably do not have the capability to destroy.
But Mr. Netanyahu described Iran’s new president, Hassan Rouhani, as a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” who would “smile and build a bomb.” The prime minister said Iran had not yet crossed the red line he laid out last fall in a United Nations speech but was nearing it. He also said that because Israel is closer and “more vulnerable,” it would “have to address this question of how to stop Iran, perhaps before the United States does.” He said those demands “should be backed up with ratcheted sanctions,” adding, “They have to know you’ll be prepared to take military action; that’s the only thing that will get their attention.”
The CBS interview followed similar remarks Mr. Netanyahu made Sunday morning at the opening of his cabinet meeting here, part of a stepped-up campaign planned in the coming days to return the world’s attention to the Iranian nuclear program. The implied criticism of the American government’s approach since Mr. Rouhani’s election came as Israeli and Palestinian officials were expecting Secretary of State John Kerry to return to the Middle East this week for his sixth visit in four months to try to revive peace talks. Formally, the United States agrees with each of Mr. Netanyahu’s demands. But in negotiations that fell apart last spring, the Obama administration appeared willing to lift some sanctions in return for far more modest “confidence building” steps, and seems likely to be willing to leave Iran with some limited nuclear production capability in return for highly intrusive inspections. American, European, Russian and Chinese officials are meeting on Tuesday to review the proposals that Iran rejected and to decide whether to present them anew to Iran’s president-elect, Hassan Rouhani, a former nuclear negotiator.
At the same time, Israeli leaders were rankled by American officials’ having confirmed over the weekend that Israel had attacked a shipment of advanced Russian-made antiship missiles in Latakia, Syria, this month, said to be the fourth Israeli strike in Syria since January. Yuval Steinitz, a senior minister close to Mr. Netanyahu, said on Israeli radio that “intelligence leaks are bad whether they come from there or from here.” Uzi Landau, another government minister, added, “The less they talk, the better it is for everyone.” “We don’t know how much influence Rouhani will have,” a senior administration official told reporters in Washington on Friday, before Mr. Netanyahu’s comments. But the official added that Mr. Rouhani’s tone suggested he was “going in a different direction” and might be open to a broad deal that would result in the lifting of sanctions, particularly those that have dramatically cut into Iran’s oil revenue.
The American official, briefing reporters on the condition of anonymity, added that “we are open to direct talks.”
In the interview on Sunday, Mr. Netanyahu was far more suspicious of Iran, and of Mr. Rouhani, calling him a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” whose strategy is to “smile and build a bomb.” The prime minister said that because Israel is closer and “more vulnerable,” it would “have to address this question of how to stop Iran, perhaps before the United States does.”
The CBS interview followed similar remarks Mr. Netanyahu made Sunday morning at the opening of his cabinet meeting here, part of a stepped-up campaign planned in the coming days to return the world’s attention to the Iranian nuclear program. The implied criticism of Washington’s approach since Mr. Rouhani’s election came as Israeli and Palestinian officials were expecting Secretary of State John Kerry to return to the Middle East sometime this week for his sixth visit in four months to try and revive peace talks.
At the same time, Israeli leaders were rankled by American officials’ having confirmed over the weekend that Israel had attacked a shipment of advanced Russian-made antiship missiles in Latakia, Syria, this month, the fourth Israeli strike on Syria since January. Yuval Steinitz, a senior minister close to Mr. Netanyahu, said on Israeli radio that “intelligence leaks are bad whether they come from there or from here.” Uzi Landau, another government minister, added, “The less they talk, the better it is for everyone.”
Asked about the Latakia attack on “Face the Nation,” Mr. Netanyahu said he was “not in the habit of saying what we did or we didn’t do,” but that his policy was “to prevent the transfer of dangerous weapons to Hezbollah,” the Lebanese Shiite militant organization, “and other terror groups.”Asked about the Latakia attack on “Face the Nation,” Mr. Netanyahu said he was “not in the habit of saying what we did or we didn’t do,” but that his policy was “to prevent the transfer of dangerous weapons to Hezbollah,” the Lebanese Shiite militant organization, “and other terror groups.”
Itamar Rabinovich, a former Israeli ambassador to the United States, said in an interview that tension over revelations about Israeli operations has surfaced in several administrations and did not threaten the two countries’ “longstanding, complex relationship with manifold interests.”Itamar Rabinovich, a former Israeli ambassador to the United States, said in an interview that tension over revelations about Israeli operations has surfaced in several administrations and did not threaten the two countries’ “longstanding, complex relationship with manifold interests.”
“Let’s say that Israel would rather this would not have been leaked out of Washington,” he said. “So be it. These squeaks are part of the relationship.”“Let’s say that Israel would rather this would not have been leaked out of Washington,” he said. “So be it. These squeaks are part of the relationship.”

Jodi Rudoren reported from Jerusalem, and David E. Sanger from Washington.