This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23323269

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Trident replacement options to be published Downgrading Trident 'naive or reckless' - defence secretary
(about 3 hours later)
A Liberal Democrat review set up to help resolve coalition differences over replacing the UK's Trident nuclear deterrent is being published later. Defence Secretary Philip Hammond says it would be "naive or reckless" not to have a like-for-like replacement of the UK's Trident nuclear weapons system.
The Lib Dems favour halving the number of Vanguard missile-carrying submarines to two, but the Conservatives say this would be "reckless". A Lib Dem review of alternatives is set to favour cutting the Vanguard missile-carrying submarines from four to two.
The review has examined alternative options to like-for-like replacement. The Lib Dems say the existing system was designed for the Cold War era.
Its findings come as a group of former defence secretaries and military chiefs said Trident should not be downgraded. Mr Hammond said it was not possible to predict future threats and said the plan would mean a "tiny saving for a huge gamble" with Britain's security.
Ahead of the review's publication at about 11:00 BST a group of former defence secretaries and military chiefs said Trident should not be downgraded.
In a letter to the Daily Telegraph, former Conservative defence secretaries Liam Fox and Sir Malcolm Rifkind, Labour's Bob Ainsworth, Lord Reid of Cardowan and Lord Robertson, together with ex-chiefs of defence staff Lord Boyce and Lord Stirrup, set out their support for like-for-like replacement by saying the government should not "take risks with our security" by downgrading Trident in an "uncertain world".In a letter to the Daily Telegraph, former Conservative defence secretaries Liam Fox and Sir Malcolm Rifkind, Labour's Bob Ainsworth, Lord Reid of Cardowan and Lord Robertson, together with ex-chiefs of defence staff Lord Boyce and Lord Stirrup, set out their support for like-for-like replacement by saying the government should not "take risks with our security" by downgrading Trident in an "uncertain world".
Defence Secretary Philip Hammond will present the findings of Lib Dem cabinet minister Danny Alexander's Trident Alternatives Review at 11:00 BST.
MPs will debate them on Wednesday.
'No conclusions''No conclusions'
The UK has had a continuous at-sea nuclear deterrent, with at least one submarine on patrol at any given time, for more than 40 years and has used the Trident system since the early 1980s.The UK has had a continuous at-sea nuclear deterrent, with at least one submarine on patrol at any given time, for more than 40 years and has used the Trident system since the early 1980s.
The current four-submarine fleet will reach the end of its lifespan in the 2020s.The current four-submarine fleet will reach the end of its lifespan in the 2020s.
A final decision on whether to renew it has been delayed until 2016 amid differences between the coalition partners.A final decision on whether to renew it has been delayed until 2016 amid differences between the coalition partners.
The review results from a compromise reached by the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats in the 2010 coalition agreement.The review results from a compromise reached by the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats in the 2010 coalition agreement.
The Conservatives, who support like-for-like renewal, and the Lib Dems, who have long been sceptical, agreed to the value-for-money review to look into other options, including alternative delivery systems and a slimmed-down version of the current system.The Conservatives, who support like-for-like renewal, and the Lib Dems, who have long been sceptical, agreed to the value-for-money review to look into other options, including alternative delivery systems and a slimmed-down version of the current system.
But BBC defence correspondent Jonathan Beale says the review does not draw conclusions nor make specific recommendations and will sharpen the divide between the parties.But BBC defence correspondent Jonathan Beale says the review does not draw conclusions nor make specific recommendations and will sharpen the divide between the parties.
Critics have questioned whether the UK can continue to pay for Trident in its current form. The government estimates renewal costs will be between £15bn and £20bn but anti-nuclear campaigners say the figure will be much higher.Critics have questioned whether the UK can continue to pay for Trident in its current form. The government estimates renewal costs will be between £15bn and £20bn but anti-nuclear campaigners say the figure will be much higher.
The Ministry of Defence says the current cost of operating the Trident fleet is about 5% of the annual £34bn defence budget.The Ministry of Defence says the current cost of operating the Trident fleet is about 5% of the annual £34bn defence budget.
Mr Hammond, a Conservative, has said all possible alternatives to Trident would be "less capable, less credible and more expensive" and would not provide the same "level of protection" from external aggression.Mr Hammond, a Conservative, has said all possible alternatives to Trident would be "less capable, less credible and more expensive" and would not provide the same "level of protection" from external aggression.
'Nuclear ladder''Nuclear ladder'
But Lib Dem former defence minister Nick Harvey told the BBC it was time to "take some steps down the nuclear ladder" following the end of the Cold War. But former Lib Dem defence minister Nick Harvey told the BBC it was time to "take some steps down the nuclear ladder" following the end of the Cold War.
The review will not have any direct impact on the policy of the coalition government, which affirmed its commitment to Trident in its programme for government in 2010.The review will not have any direct impact on the policy of the coalition government, which affirmed its commitment to Trident in its programme for government in 2010.
But it will inform debate on future spending priorities and on Lib Dem policy in the run-up to the next election.But it will inform debate on future spending priorities and on Lib Dem policy in the run-up to the next election.
The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament said cancelling Trident would bring "strategic and economic benefits" and for the government not to consider this seriously would be an "abdication of responsibility".The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament said cancelling Trident would bring "strategic and economic benefits" and for the government not to consider this seriously would be an "abdication of responsibility".
Publishing an alternative review, which it says has the backing of a number of Lib Dem and Labour MPs, its general secretary Kate Hudson said not proceeding could save £100bn and give the UK "moral leadership" in global disarmament talks.Publishing an alternative review, which it says has the backing of a number of Lib Dem and Labour MPs, its general secretary Kate Hudson said not proceeding could save £100bn and give the UK "moral leadership" in global disarmament talks.
The letter from the former defence secretaries and defence chiefs warns the UK cannot "foresee what threats will develop over the next 30 years. Reducing our submarine-based Trident capability would weaken our national security for the sake of a very small fraction of the defence budget".The letter from the former defence secretaries and defence chiefs warns the UK cannot "foresee what threats will develop over the next 30 years. Reducing our submarine-based Trident capability would weaken our national security for the sake of a very small fraction of the defence budget".
They say: "It is our view that if Britain is to remain a leading global power with strong defences, nothing less than a continuous-at-sea deterrent will do."They say: "It is our view that if Britain is to remain a leading global power with strong defences, nothing less than a continuous-at-sea deterrent will do."