This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/24/health/fda-takes-steps-toward-ruling-on-menthol-cigarettes.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
F.D.A Takes Steps Toward Ruling on Menthol Cigarettes F.D.A Takes Steps Toward Ruling on Menthol Cigarettes
(35 minutes later)
WASHINGTON — The Food and Drug Administration inched closer on Tuesday to a decision on whether to ban menthol in cigarettes, releasing its own scientific review that found the mint flavoring made it easier to start smoking and harder to quit.WASHINGTON — The Food and Drug Administration inched closer on Tuesday to a decision on whether to ban menthol in cigarettes, releasing its own scientific review that found the mint flavoring made it easier to start smoking and harder to quit.
The agency also published a notice in the federal register calling for input from the public on the “potential regulation on menthol in cigarettes,” another step in the rulemaking progress that began in 2009 when Congress exempted menthol from a ban on flavors in cigarettes.The agency also published a notice in the federal register calling for input from the public on the “potential regulation on menthol in cigarettes,” another step in the rulemaking progress that began in 2009 when Congress exempted menthol from a ban on flavors in cigarettes.
The move is likely to please smoking opponents, who have been calling for F.D.A. action on menthol cigarettes. They account for about a quarter of all cigarettes smoked in the United States and are particularly popular among African-Americans.The move is likely to please smoking opponents, who have been calling for F.D.A. action on menthol cigarettes. They account for about a quarter of all cigarettes smoked in the United States and are particularly popular among African-Americans.
Still, it was only an intermediate step in what advocates say has been a prolonged process. Many expected the agency to act on menthol in 2011 after a Congressionally mandated committee of outside experts, convened by the F.D.A., found that menthol had a negative effect on public health.Still, it was only an intermediate step in what advocates say has been a prolonged process. Many expected the agency to act on menthol in 2011 after a Congressionally mandated committee of outside experts, convened by the F.D.A., found that menthol had a negative effect on public health.
“This is either a way to take the heat off, or the beginning of a meaningful process,” said Matthew L. Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, an advocacy group. “That’s the book the jury is still out on.”“This is either a way to take the heat off, or the beginning of a meaningful process,” said Matthew L. Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, an advocacy group. “That’s the book the jury is still out on.”
Mitchell Zeller, the new head of the F.D.A.'s Center for Tobacco Products, said the steps the agency took on Tuesday showed it is moving forward as fast as it can. The public comment period will be open for 60 days.Mitchell Zeller, the new head of the F.D.A.'s Center for Tobacco Products, said the steps the agency took on Tuesday showed it is moving forward as fast as it can. The public comment period will be open for 60 days.
“The F.D.A. is a regulatory agency,” he said on a conference call for journalists. “As a regulatory agency we can only go as far as the regulatory science will take us.”“The F.D.A. is a regulatory agency,” he said on a conference call for journalists. “As a regulatory agency we can only go as far as the regulatory science will take us.”
He added: “The bottom line is, we need more information. We also need input form the public.” He added: “The bottom line is, we need more information. We also need input from the public.”
Mr. Myers said the timing of the announcement was likely linked to an international trade dispute. The United States has until Wednesday to comply with a World Trade Organization ruling. It held that the U.S. ban onclove cigarettes under the 2009 law violated Indonesia’s trade rights if the United States was not also banning menthol. Indonesia, a maker of clove cigarettes, brought the suit. The United States contended that menthol posed a different public health risk than other flavors, but the W.T.O. did not accept the argument. Mr. Myers said the timing of the announcement was likely linked to an international trade dispute. The United States has until Wednesday to comply with a World Trade Organization ruling. It held that the United States ban on clove cigarettes under the 2009 law violated Indonesia’s trade rights if the United States was not also banning menthol. Indonesia, a maker of clove cigarettes, brought the suit. The United States contended that menthol posed a different public health risk than other flavors, but the W.T.O. did not accept the argument.