This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23433902

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
HS2 challenge rejected by Court of Appeal HS2 challenge rejected by Court of Appeal
(35 minutes later)
The latest legal challenge to the HS2 high-speed rail project has been rejected by the Court of Appeal.The latest legal challenge to the HS2 high-speed rail project has been rejected by the Court of Appeal.
Objectors including residents' groups and 15 councils along the route had asked judges to order a further assessment of the scheme as a whole.Objectors including residents' groups and 15 councils along the route had asked judges to order a further assessment of the scheme as a whole.
Judges dismissed all seven grounds of the challenge but said a final appeal could be made to the Supreme Court. Judges dismissed all seven grounds of challenge against the London-Birmingham section of HS2, but said a final appeal could be made to the Supreme Court.
Ministers said opponents should not "waste any more taxpayers' money" on litigation. A minister urged opponents not to "waste" taxpayers' money on litigation.
High-speed rail minister Simon Burns said: "By dismissing all seven grounds of appeal and declining to refer the case to Europe, this is the second time in four months a court has rejected attempts to derail HS2. Transport minister Simon Burns said: "By dismissing all seven grounds of appeal and declining to refer the case to Europe, this is the second time in four months a court has rejected attempts to derail HS2.
"Parliament is the right place to debate the merits of HS2, not the law courts, and we will introduce the hybrid bill for phase one before the year is out.""Parliament is the right place to debate the merits of HS2, not the law courts, and we will introduce the hybrid bill for phase one before the year is out."
Mr Burns said the government would continue with the "crucial business" of getting HS2 ready for construction in 2017.Mr Burns said the government would continue with the "crucial business" of getting HS2 ready for construction in 2017.
The objectors said HS2 would cause an unacceptable level of environmental damage, loss of homes and disruption to many communities. The project, currently expected to cost £42.6bn, is intended to allow trains to run at 250 mph (400km/h) from London to Birmingham from 2026, with branches to Manchester and Leeds - via Sheffield - planned by 2032.
The objectors said scheme would cause an unacceptable level of environmental damage, loss of homes and disruption to many communities.
'Riding roughshod'
David Elvin QC, for HS2 Action Alliance, told the Court of Appeal the project had already blighted properties along the route and argued it had been given the go-ahead in breach of EU rules requiring a strategic environmental assessment (SEA).
Councillor Martin Tett, chairman of the 51m Alliance, which opposes HS2, said he was "disappointed" with the court's decision but encouraged that one of the three judges disagreed with the others on the SEA issue.
"Lord Justice Sullivan gives a very strong steer that HS2 Ltd has failed both in its obligation to fully assess the environmental implications of the project and vitally to assess these against the alternative we have put forward," said Mr Tett, who is also leader of Buckinghamshire County Council.
Mr Tett added: "This is another example of the Department for Transport and HS2 Ltd riding roughshod over public opinion, ploughing ahead regardless of what local communities want and ignoring the environmental merits of the alternatives."
The 51m Alliance's proposed alternative to HS2 includes improvements to the West Coast Mainline and adding carriages to trains on existing lines to increase capacity.